Why has the cost of Lasik and cosmetic surgery plummeted, while all other healthcare costs have skyrocketed?
Why do Rs & Ds argue endlessly over who should pay the bill for healthcare (patients or taxpayers), but not about why the bill is so high?
Because you're being robbed.
R & D politicians rob you for the billionaires who put them in office:
- Insurance mandates & subsidies
- Certificate of need laws
- Big pharma patent abuse
- Generic import bans
- Cost-plus regulations
Get rid of these, healthcare becomes affordable.
They can't have that.
Instead, they pretend to fight over it, while it becomes so expensive that eventually no one can afford to directly pay, and then they make it completely taxpayer-funded, so that those cronies can charge whatever they want, and pass the bill along to you, the taxpayer.
Why not just tax the rich to pay for it then?
Because the rich pass all their costs along to the consumers of their goods & services. You.
So the poorer you are, the higher a % of your income is spent buying things, the higher your de facto tax rate is.
It's a shell game.
The answer is to get government out of healthcare entirely, like with Lasik and cosmetic surgery, so costs go down, and competition and innovation will lead to better access and quality.
Republicrats won't tell you that, because they don't serve you. They serve their sponsors.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Though done democratically, this decision was to put it frankly, damn stupid. Unfortunately it put the residents of Middleborough in a sticky situation.
Should they obey the law or risk the fine? I believe they should say to hell with the fine and speak how they want.
Whether it’s a comedic banning of dancing or swearing, localities and states are passing many stupid laws around the country.
While it may seem silly, many of these laws are enforced, and libertarians in office can focus on getting these laws off the books.
#BlackHistoryMonth
In 1825, Black residents of New York City began buying over 100 plots of land north of the city. They took advantage of low property prices from subdivided farmland so they could seek refuge from the crowded and poverty-stricken neighborhoods of the time.
Soon it became home to about 1,600 people. Among them was a predominantly black community that bought affordable plots to build homes, churches, and a school. It became known as Seneca Village.
Over half of the residents owned their own homes, giving them the right to vote, which was restricted due to property quotas. As the town grew, Irish and German immigrants moved to Seneca and were tight-knit with the Black community in a rare example of integration at the time.
#BlackHistoryMonth On May 13, 1985 Philadelphia police bombed a residential neighborhood, killing 11 people, including 5 children, and destroying 65 houses and leaving around 250 people homeless.
Prior to the #MOVEbombing, Philly PD fired 10,000 rounds into the neighborhood indiscriminately, ultimately deciding to airdrop military-grade bombs on it, despite knowing that there were many children present.
All in order to capture a handful of members of a group called MOVE, who were resisting arrest.
Let me repeat that: they fired automatic weapons & dropped bombs on a community with children, then allowed the fire to spread, because some people were resisting arrest.
#Thread
Oregon HB2238 has been introduced in the Oregon State House. It would effectively make any and all property, including personal property, able to be seized under a declared state of emergency by the Governor. bit.ly/3rkl3yo
Let me explain...
HB2238 seeks to modify ORS 35.350 and ORS 401.188 – both of which are current standing laws. Below is the current version and the new proposed amendments to ORS 35.350
As of right now, ORS 35.350 gives cops the ability to take possession of any items that present a danger to “persons or property”, such as seizure of meth labs, explosives, etc. that officials find dangerous. This is fairly standard law.
More kids are going to be put in cages, with one major improvement:
Left-leaning corporate media will painstakingly look for ways to frame this as positively as possible.
If you voted for Biden because Trump was mean to migrants, you're not going to like the next 4 years.
As I've noted many times, Biden helped write and sponsor some of the most strict immigration restrictions on the books, and was VP to Deporter-In-Chief Obama.
Biden is about to be worse on immigration than Trump was, with a much more compliant media.
Who built the cages, Joe?
In the article, there is only one item that is put in much larger letters than the rest.
This is what slow-walking looks like.
Yes, Trump's policies could be ended the same way they were introduced: with the swipe of a pen.