ICYMI: 5 major Georgia companies have NOT outright condemned voter suppression bills #HB531 and #SB241, despite growing pressure from community activists. Take a look at who these companies are and what their statements say🧵⤵️
.@aflac released a statement calling for “secure voting while preserving election integrity”—language that parrots the baseless voter fraud claims made by Trump and Republicans. Make no mistake: these bills do not stop fraud—they stop young people and people of color from voting.
.@CocaCola has long highlighted its activism in the Civil Rights Movement and its backing of the National Center for Civil and Human Rights. Yet, they've failed to condemn voter suppression legislation that poses a direct affront to the very issues they claim to care about.
As one of Georgia's most powerful stakeholders, @Delta has betrayed its commitment to democracy by standing by GA's regressive voting laws. Offering free WIFI on flights to encourage voter registration doesn't cut it.
It's no secret that @HomeDepot has been a long-time ally of Republicans. In 2020 alone, it gave over $1.1 million to GOP candidates. The company's passivity around GA's flurry of voter suppression bills only affirms its loyalty to the Party of Disenfranchisement.
.@UPS claims to be committed to “voter engagement” and “equitable access to the polls.”If that was really true, then the company would've issued a cautionary statement to Georgia Republicans about their disenfranchising actions. Instead, it chose vague platitudes.
🍑EYES ON GEORGIA! These five companies have called the Peach State home for decades. As leaders in the business community, It's their collective responsibility to hold Georgia Republicans accountable for brazen voter suppression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🎓THREAD: College students make up nearly 20 million eligible voters across the country and are often the target of voter suppression, especially students who move to another state for school. Let’s break down the ins and outs of student voting⤵️
✅Starting with the basics: College students can register to vote using their campus address. In 1979, #SCOTUS affirmed in Symm v. United States that blocking college students from using their school address to register to vote violated the 26th Amendment.
The 26th Amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the federal voting age to 18 and prohibited voter discrimination based on age. Voting laws targeting college students usually incorporate some aspect of age, so Symm fell under the 26th.🗳
🚨SOON: At 12:00 PM ET the House Administration Committee will meet about a petition for the #IA02 2020 congressional race. We'll be live-tweeting the meeting on this thread. Before the meeting starts, get the facts on the situation below⤵️
The 2020 #IA02 congressional race was extremely close after GOP candidate Marianette Miller-Meeks was certified as the winner by 6 votes. Democratic candidate Rita Hart contested the results under the 1969 Federal Contested Elections Act, claiming 22 legal votes were not counted.
Hart filed a petition with the House Administration Committee who oversees contest election adjudication. The committee is chaired by Democratic Representative Zoe Lofgren of #CA19. Miller-Meeks was provisionally seated as the #IA02 representative until the contest is settled.
🚨ALERT: FIVE GOP Senators have announced that they will NOT seek re-election in 2022. In many of these states, Republicans have already proven they’ll suppress voters in order to win.
See for yourself👇
RETIREE: Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri
For decades, Missouri Republicans have tried to suppress the vote through the enactment of onerous voting ID laws. Take a look at this 2018 lawsuit👇democracydocket.com/state/missouri/
North Carolina is no stranger to bad voting laws. Thirteen different lawsuits tell this story, ranging from Republican challenges to early voting, attacks on vote by mail and aggressive gerrymandering👇 democracydocket.com/state/north-ca…
🚨ALERT: The biggest voting rights case of the term is headed to #SCOTUS TOMORROW, Brnovich v. DNC. Here’s a breakdown of how this Arizona case got started and what’s at stake. THREAD🧵:
This case started in 2013 with Shelby County v. Holder, when Arizona was released from the preclearance requirement and the DOJ/D.C. Federal District Court no longer had to approve changes to their voting laws. After Shelby, AZ started passing voter suppression laws. (1/12)
One law made it a felony to return someone’s ballot, a practice known as ballot collection. Ballot collection is used in Hispanic communities, where activists use it for GOTV drives, and in Native American communities, where it can be harder to access the postal service. (2/12)
🧵WHO'S WHO: Here are the players in Trump's second impeachment trial...
ROLE: The Presiding Officer
PLAYED BY: Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT)
PURPOSE: Tasks include receiving questions from individual senators and reading them aloud to either the House Impeachment Managers or Trump's legal team.
ROLE: The Jury
PLAYED BY: All 100 U.S. Senators
PURPOSE: All 100 senators, including Sen. Leahy, will serve as the jury in the trial. The senators must sit quietly and remain seated during the trial. That's right—NO phones! The senators will submit written questions to Leahy.