Notice CHRC doesn't mention how UNDRIP will not be international law under Canada, Canada gets to decide all decisions on it , we already know how that goes, they are also selling some swampland if you're buying into this ..👎
mondaq.com/canada/indigen… - "UNDRIP will be affirmed "as a universal international human rights instrument with application in Canadian law." -- NOT International Law anymore.
"The Government of Canada will be required to take all necessary measures to ensure Canadian laws are consistent with the articles of UNDRIP" --- Sure they will !! You see how that plays out now on a daily basis. You really buying into this?
"𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮, 𝗶𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀 (Me: 𝗔𝗞𝗔 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗙𝗡 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗠𝗡𝗖, only who the gov wants to recognize was consulted with 🤨), will have three years following the passage of Bill C-15
to develop and implement a national action plan to achieve the objectives of UNDRIP. The government will be required to publish annual reports on the preparation and implementation of the action plan."
"The passing of Bill C-15 will likely affect negotiations between Canada and Indigenous peoples across the country, and, in particular, influence discussions at the 80 active tables in Canada's Recognition and Implementation of Indigenous Rights and Self-Determination program
and the implementation of Indigenous jurisdiction over children, youth and families through An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families, S.C. 2019, c. 24, which specifically identifies implementing UNDRIP as one of its purposes."- Which does not
recognize NonStatus or NonMNC Metis. Canada is trying to kill soverign nations and be the voice of authority. Is that who you trust to build a future for your people? Do you trust Canada to have your best interests in heart for future generations of Indigenous people? Or do you
think their policies are still ethnocidal and genocidal.. Up to you to decide. How much do you trust Canada to have your best interests at heart ? <3
"Because once you look past the flowery words of the preamble, Bill C-15 is not only full of empty promises, it actually delivers the opposite of what the government and its team of Indigenous salespersons are promising." aptnnews.ca/national-news/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Les enfants de la colonie- Les metis de l’Empire francais entre sujetion et citoyennete´. By Emmanuelle Saada - book review edited by Christophe Prochasson.
I find it very interesting how I post about people who identified as Metis in the 70's and I turned them into Metis. I didn't know how powerful I am apparently, What you won't say to try and look good, dear god, LOL
I really want to hear this story Darryl, you're right, it does sound intense, considering I was born in the 70's and these Metis were making land claims in the 70's, I am honestly confused how in the hell did I do that? LOL Time Travel?
Mal i Mic news December 1976 - NCC, Cabinet talks on Land Claim Study - Harry Daniels, Melvin Nash - setting up an organization to research the claims of the NonStatus and Metis people., Nope definitely not me @DarrylLeroux, that definitely looks like it (1973, I was 2)
That is pretty big speech from a Nation who borrows all their culture from other nations. And, like there are other First Nations, there are other Metis peoples and cultures. I don't owe you anything, Mr Little Man. Take your misogynistic gaslighting elsewhere. @billy_isenor
You are not from my community, I don't know who the hell you think you are, demanding anything from me. I do not claim to be from your community and you sure as hell do not speak for mine. Am I clear enough for you Billy?
You can stop with the bull shitting speeches, cause McCargar case has already stated that the Non Profit Society the Metis National Council does not speak for any other community other than the registered members of their own through their own constitution and bylaws, so you can
Acadie and the Acadians-by Roth, D. Luther- 1891 - these remarks concerning the people of this nationality in the settlement-class which has been swallowed up by admixture with the Native American Indians, kind of a miscegenation. Paul Laurent- Chief of the Indians on La Have,
who was in all probability a half-breed French-Indian.
Just like my uncle who signed the 1761 treaty, he was also a French-Indian half-breed and also was the chief of the La Have Indians. You know, that was one of the treaties used in the Marshall case.
It's also interesting that another of my great grandfathers brother signed the ratified 1725 Treaty, which treaty is the one the rest all flow from. He too was a French-Indian half-breed. Mathew Mius. Canadian native law cases- - by Slattery, Brian 1980 - R V Syliboy.
as you can see, I am not sure who owns CanLii, or the connections here .. but apparently they do not have to follow their own Privacy Act, RSC 1985, c P-21