I found it in the research!!! "...the kinds of deconditioning & resocialization operative in most new religions (cults) is essentially the same as that used by traditional religions, the military, therapists, & many other legitimate social organizations."
Basically, my book 👆
"individuals are subject to certain well-recognized social psychological processes of influence, of varying degrees of intensity & potential coerciveness. But the members of new religions do not lose their capacity to think for themselves or determine their own actions."
People are active participants in their
own conversion and resocialization, not the passive victims of exploitive leaders.
This does not mean exploitation never occurs, but joining a new religious movement is the result of a process of negotiation, as is being induced to adopt a more radical stance within such a group.
The rhetoric of mind control obscures more than it
clarifies, hindering our ability to discern the variables and patterns of interaction that do produce the ‘‘deployable agents’’ new religions use for proselytizing or other more extreme and threatening activities.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Happy Sunday, all. Welcome back to Coffee & Culture #8.
We're gonna have a 🧵 about the term "Loyalty", how we use it individually, how we use it organizationally, & how it becomes problematic fast. And cults, of course, y'all know me.
"When Loyalty & Obedience go too far"
2/ First, like any good English major or social scientist, let's define our term:
Loyalty: the quality or state or an instance of being loyal.
"LOYALTY implies a faithfulness that is steadfast in the face of any temptation to renounce, desert, or betray."
By request, here on some thoughts on why Soldiers and service members may be refusing the jab. This will not really be about vaccines, but rather about group think and culture, because, you know, that's what I do.
First of all, in the study of how this pandemic has played out differently than other pandemics, (Ebola, AIDs, Zika, etc) a big impact was from the politicization of community responsive behavior (a human health term), in this case, mask wearing.
No other country made it a debate of left & right, thanks Trump. Now, obvs, AIDS was dealt with horrifically, but at least once it became clear that things like condoms & not sharing needles were the community behavior needed, people began to comply--or risk being seen as jerks.
Has anyone ever studied how the military got DUI' culture from "You can't make SGM without at least 2x DUIs" to "Nobody around a base will dare to drive after more than 2 drinks?" And then compared that to the supposed *impossibility* of ending rape-culture? Let's have a thread.
Culture change is hard, but it's doable. There are literal advanced degrees in this stuff, so, so, so much data, and all kinds of people doing this work. I was heartbroken to find just how much research has been done on the disgusting reality of what women go through in service.
Heartbroken because we know the right answer, but nobody cares. We don't know all the steps, but we know enough that, to quote @gilltheamazon "When those with the power to create change *decide* to start" (emphasis mine), we can outline real steps rapidly.
Multiple friends have been reaching out lately, asking some version of "how did people get radicalized to such an extent?" and, more importantly, "why not us? why was I immune." As someone who's extremism in person, pretty much my whole life, here are some thoughts:
These are EXACTLY the questions we should all be asking ourselves right now. Studies have shown that no 'type' of person is immune to radicalization or falling prey to cults or cult-think. There's no such thing as being "too smart" for that.
So, for starters, many of us were just in the right place and the right time, and didn't get radicalized. That is an important realization. It's important because as we begin to try to de-radicalize our friends, family and "good people" who fell prey to white supremacist thought
Good morning, let me tell you a bit about my experience in my college-neighborhood gym & the veterans who use it, while wearing my 101 tank top. Maybe it’ll help us think about how to solve the “invisible veterans” (read women) problem. (A thread)
Most days I go to the gym wearing an assortment of Army unit t-shirts or tanks. Why, you ask 🤷♀️? 1) bc it’s work out gear I own 2) bc it’s comfy 3) bc I’m proud of my service 4) bc I have great memories that make me smile 5) bc I like to feel connected to the veteran community
People who study group behavior call this signaling gear—the pin from your church, the runner’s 26.2 sticker, MAGA hat, BLM sign, the 101st T-shirt. You get it. It helps us to suss out & connect with those “like us” or n some way. It’s likely an evolutionary survival mechanism.