EXC: Foreign criminals + failed asylum seekers will get only one chance to appeal decisions to deport them under new Home Office proposals.

Part of a massive shake-up to quicken deportation. Currently multiple appeals allowed. (With @charleshymas.)
telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/1…
Telegraph understands the following proposals are coming from the Home Office...

1) A ‘one stop shop’ for people appealing deportation. Means all claims must be made at one point rather than one after the other. Would quicken legal process.
2) Reforms to the Modern Slavery Act 2015. Specifically tightening the definition of modern slavery.

Home Office believes it is being used too often by people who legitimately should be deported.

(Others - including perhaps @theresa_may who championed the law - may disagree)
3) Changes to the rules for when someone who had their asylum claim rejected can appeal.

Specifically - focussing on whether they can prove “exceptional circumstances” and tightening the definition of human rights grounds for appealing.
4) Tightly limiting how late people who are being deported can launch last minute appeals.

Proposal is a deadline stating all appeals must be launched 14 days before the date of deportation.
This follows two policy proposals we’ve already reported on...

5) All people illegally entering UK to claim asylum will be removed + have it processed abroad

6) Tightening rules on child asylum claims so people who look over 18 (not over 25 as now) must apply as adults.
These changes amount to a major shake-up of the asylum system - the biggest in 20 years in the eyes of the Home Office.

They are also NOT guaranteed to become the rules. They are being put to consultation shortly, with responses to come back.
Those pushing them are likely to argue it is about fairness and consistency - making the asylum system safer (discouraging dangerous boat crossings), quicker (less legal wrangling) and fairer (rules less open to wrongful use).

BUT...
...The proposed changes are sure to trigger sizeable opposition from human rights groups and Labour.

.... who will likely argue it will make the system harder for people to claim asylum and tougher for wrongful deportation cases to be overturned.
Would expect the asylum rules shake-up to get significant air time over the next week as more details emerge and are scrutinised.

(Worth noting: the Home Office is braced for a potential backlash but believes their proposed changes = considerable improvements.)
Ultimately in raw political terms it comes back to the same old question. Where is the Tory backbench on the changes?

Fewer than 40 Tory MPs oppose some of the changes - fine (given the sizeable majority). But over 40 Tory MPs - problems.

END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Riley-Smith

Ben Riley-Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @benrileysmith

11 Mar
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧 I’ve spent recent weeks trying to work out what the Whitehall plan is to counter Scottish independence.

Talked to half a dozen cabinet ministers, plus Gov advisers, pro-UK camp figures. Here’s my best read-out... (thread) 1/
There is essentially a two-pronged strategy...

Prong 1: No referendum any time soon, whatever the result of Holyrood elections in May

Prong 2: Low key campaign to counter independence by existing pro-UK bodies and a billion-pound spending spree
Prong 1: It’s a no

Has been the PM’s stance for a long time that he’s not about to grant a referendum.

There is a desire to elevate that in the coming weeks, clearly + loudly laying out the arguments before May elections.
Read 24 tweets
8 Mar
Oh dear. Ministerial slap down from No 10.

Children's minister Vicky Ford said if kids get lateral flow test positive, then PCR negative, they CAN’T go back to school

That is wrong, No 10 makes clear. Lateral flow test positive then PCR negative means kids CAN go back to school
Clarity is emerging from the muddle, via an education source.

1) IN SCHOOL
If a pupil gets a lateral flow positive at school... they are advised not to get a PCR test... and even if they do get a PCR test which is negative they must stay at home.

But...
2) AT HOME
If a pupil gets a lateral flow positive at home... they are advised to get a PCR test... and if that PCR test is negative they can go back to school.

Why the difference? Gov argues lateral tests done in school are more trustworthy as those giving them are trained.
Read 4 tweets
2 Mar
Embargo just lifted on a big bit of Budget news....

Furlough to be extended until end of SEPTEMBER. Millions likely to benefit, at a cost of billions. telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/…
:: Full furlough until end of June
- Government covers 80% of wages, up to £2.5k a month max

:: Then a tapered scheme
- July: Gov covers 70%, company covers the extra 10%
- Aug/Sep: Gov covers 60%, company covers extra 20%
Under the Government’s roadmap lockdown restrictions are due to be fully lifted by June 21 (earliest)

Meaning furlough could carry on months after businesses are allowed to reopen fully.
Read 6 tweets
2 Mar
Seems to me Keir Starmer’s ‘no tax rises now’ position makes strategic sense.

One of Labour’s big failings in 15, 17, 19 elections was being soundly beaten on the economy.

Having a ‘why are you so pro-business’ row now only helps Starmer’s rebranding project for 2024.
Which is why you suspect Starmer’s office will be pretty relaxed with Corbyn frontbenchers criticising the stance and PM noting it’s a big departure from Labour’s 2019 manifesto.

(All giving big air time to the fact Starmer is abandoning Corbyn’s position on tax and business)
Having Tories throw the quotes from this week back at Starmer in the run-up to the next election (when Labour’s tax offering will inevitably be more progressive than the Conservatives) is the weakness in the strategy. But can worry about that in 2024.
Read 4 tweets
21 Feb
NEW: Many more details have now been confirmed about Boris Johnson’s reopening plan. This is what we know... (thread) 1/
There will be four stages in the road map, announced tomorrow. They roughly align with the coming months: March, April, May, June. 2/
There will be specific dates but they will be ‘earliest dates’. So ones that can be pushed back if the data turns bad. 3/
Read 18 tweets
19 Feb
Secrecy at all costs: Inside the Downing Street bunker preparing Britain’s lockdown exit. Longish read with @LOS_Fisher

Rishi, Gove, Hancock handed numbered paper copies of road map they couldn’t take with them amid heightened leak fears 1/
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/…
Special advisers explicitly warned on recent Zoom calls with No 10 chief of staff Dan Rosenfield against Covid leaks, per multiple sources.

Some have taken a vow of silence fearing for their jobs if they discuss the road map. One: “I don’t want to be sacked”. 2/
Cabinet ministers being “kept in the dark” about the road map. So too many ministers whose briefs directly relate to countering Covid.

The heart of decision-making is ‘The Quad’ (PM, Rishi, Gove, Hancock) plus the scientists: Whitty, Vallance, sometimes JVT. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!