1/ Lockdown-driven public health interventions have skewed COVID-19 infections in a deadly way, driving the virus away from the young, and towards the old. This distribution looks nothing like other pandemics over the last 100 years. academic.oup.com/epirev/article…
2/ By shunting the disease to the most vulnerable, these actions have nearly doubled deaths, increasing deaths from COVID-19 by more than 150K through 1/9/21 alone. This is a direct result of NOT taking a #FocusedProtection approach.
3/ Far from flattening the curve, these actions have also increased hospitalizations by more than 25% had the virus been allowed to take a more natural course, where the young and healthy bore the brunt of the disease.
4/ The infection fatality rate (IFR) by age does not change, but the population IFR changes hugely based on who is infected. The IFR for COVID-19 through 1/9/21 was 0.38%. With a normal course, it could have been as low as 0.21%---lower than the 1957 flu
5/ Interestingly, as late as February 28th, Dr. Fauci published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine noting that the IFR was certainly much lower than the reported CFR—and could be as low as seasonal flu or inline with the 1957 flu. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
6/ If the 2020 US age structure were = to 1957 w/the same infection distribution, there would have been 50%+ fewer pop-adjusted CV-19 deaths than that flu. Even w/this man-mis-made infection distribution if the age structure were = to 1957we would have had fewer deaths from CV-19
7/ When comparing the infection distribution by age to other pandemics, we see that it is unlike any other in terms of where the majority of the infections occurred.
8/ Looking at Massachusetts vs. Florida by age group, we see this very clearly. Massachusetts which has incredibly harsh measures that it never lifted, has continued to have higher mortality across older cohorts relative to Florida.
9/ This phenomenon was not unknown to public health officials. In fact, it is why harsh measures like lockdowns have never been employed, and are doubly cautioned against with diseases like COVID-19 with highly stratified risk profiles. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
10/ Lockdown policies, in addition to protecting the strong have also resulted in a “protect the rich, infect the poor” dynamic. The least-educated neighborhoods in Boston had 8x higher infections than the most educated. rationalground.com/lockdowns-syst…
11/ This thread dives into this in painful, detail.
12/ It is almost certainly this dynamic which has created the large discrepancy in deaths by race seen in the spring. As policies moderated in September, nationally, excess deaths by race normalized, with all races experiencing roughly the same excess death.
13/ In California where harsh restrictions are still in place, deaths are higher, and the variance by race persists. In Florida where these policies were abandoned, all deaths are lower, and all races are seeing roughly equal daily excess deaths.
14/ These policies have not only increased deaths from COVID-19—150K+ through early January alone—They have also resulted in 100K+ excess deaths un-related to COVID-19. Younger cohorts experienced the highest rates of this non-COVID excess death. thepragmatist.co/post/bad-publi…
15/ These mitigation policies have been an abject failure, with no correlation between COVID-19 policies and deaths. They are tightly tied to extremely low rates of in-person education and high unemployment.
16/ It was for fear of all of these terrible consequences that Dr. Michael Osterholm argued against lockdowns in March, saying we were about to ring a giant bell that can’t be un-rung. Now, he is simply an apologist for these disastrous outcomes.
17/ These policies have no impact on health, because they are not driven by health. They are driven by politics. The CDC has revealed itself to be heavily influenced by politics—notably, but by no means exclusively—teachers unions.
18/ The high rates of deaths of minorities during lockdowns, was used as cover by the CDC to continue to advocate the same deadly policies, even after deaths by race nationally reverted to roughly equal levels as these policies were abandoned.
19/ These policies which killed so many minorities, and are even now robbing them of livelihoods and their children of education, are most strongly supported by those areas claiming to care most about equity—adding insult to injury.
20/ Rather than acknowledge these mistakes, the CDC is now using the most noble sentiments of half of the country—their desire for equality—to gain support for policies which are the public health version of Jim Crow. They are sowing division to avoid accountability.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Last week UT (the most child-centric state in the country) set an expiry for their mask mandates--leaving it in place for children. This must not stand. I created a series of 4posts to arm parents with data to challenge this. This is the 1st thesmileproject.global/post/un-maskin…
2/ Back in summer, many school districts made a “deal” with parents and children. Mask your kids, allow us to severely restrict their ability to interact with other children as human beings, and they can go to school.
3/ Parents were desperate, having watched the learning loss and depression of the spring, so they acquiesced.
Un-masking Children:
Thread 1 of 4: The Role of Children in COVID-19 Transmission
1/ Children are not major drivers of COVID-19 transmission. This, the most authoritative study on transmission found not one incident of child-to-adult transmission.
2/
The study was a population-representative survey, after identifying COVID positive people, they used genome sequencing and contact tracing to identify how the disease spread through the community. This level of rigor is unique.
3/ Other studies that attempt to claim significant child-to-adult transmission of COVID have not performed this analysis. The genome-sequencing is what allowed them to say definitively that none of the cases was spread from a child to an adult.
1/ This week I realized that kids will be the LAST to be un-masked. That can't happen. To help put an end to this madnessI have put together a 4-part series pulling together as much research as I can on why children should cease being masked, and how to effect that change.
2/ Back in summer, parents agreed to a deal: mask your kids and allow us to severely restrict their ability to interact with other children as human beings, & they can go to school. This should not have been the "deal". thesmileproject.global/post/un-maskin…
3/ Children's relative risk of dying of COVID (regardless of comorbidity) is less than 1/2n that of flu. Coupled with their lower transmissibility, they should not be forced to mask to protect themselves or other children. thesmileproject.global/post/un-maskin…
1/n On 3/8, Dr. Fauci said we don’t need to be walking around in facemasks. Then on April 3rd, he changed course and said we should wear masks to help slow the spread.
2/n In this message on 3/25, Canadian Dr., Gary Kobinger, one of the the members of the WHO STAG-IN task force, we may have our answer.
3/n Dr. Kobinger suggests cloth masks might work b/c mask-wearing countries in East Asia seemed to have lower transmission vs. the rest of the world. He explicitly notes that data shows they DON’T work for flu or rhinoviruses--and DIDN’T work for SARS
1/n
Anybody hear President Biden calling Texas and Mississippi governors Neanderthals for rescinding mask mandates?
Lot of anger and disappointment there. I wonder it there's a better place to direct all that?
So weird how mask mandate states are also the no-school states...
2/n There’s a reason that those graphs look so similar—it’s b/c while there is no correlation between repressive COVID restrictions and COVID deaths, there IS a significant correlation between COVID Restrictions & low-no school, and high unemployment.
3/n Know where else there’s a lot of misplaced outrage? Around COVID deaths. Liberal outrage ought to be focused on the CDC explaining the giant spring spike highlighted in yellow. Instead, it’s focused on Florida’s much smaller green bump.
1/n We are in a 5-alarm social justice emergency. But the culprits are those states whose populations claim to care the most about social justice. BLM support is tightly tied to repressive COVID policies that result in stunningly low access to education and high unemployment.
2/n There is no link whatsoever between these stringency measures and decreased deaths. There IS a very strong link between these policies, high unemployment, and extremely limited access to education.
3/n This is because these policies have nothing to do with science or health, and everything to do with politics. Race, BLM and COVID policies have been wildly politicized, which is why these policies have their tightest correlation with BLM support.