1/8 This is a thread about whether Fed policy is really as easy and dovish as it seems and as the Fed intends it to be.

I would argue it is not, and not because the Fed doesn't want it to be, but because markets are skeptical of the new Fed's framework, as the chart shows.
2/8 Monetary policy works via financial markets, and financial markets price interest rates in part based on expectations of what the Fed will do in the future.

This year, markets have pushed up the expected path for the fed funds rate a lot, despite the Fed's reassurances.
3/8 That investors are not in sync with the Fed is also evident from surveys — see this thread for our @csmresearch recent survey of investors expectations and for how it is not consistent with the Fed’s intentions.
4/8 The increase in policy expectations has accounted for about 1/3 of the increase in rates across the medium- and long-end of the yield curve.

E.g., had policy expectations not increased this year, the 10 yr rate (and mortgage rates, etc) would be ~35 bps lower, or 1.38%.
5/8 Historically, it takes about three 25 bps FFR hikes to produce a 33 bps increase in the 10yr rate. Effectively, #Fed policy has tightened by that much.

So, nothing has changed: Fed policy has tightened at the first whiff of inflation, regardless of the new framework.
6/8 Powell and the #FOMC have been very clear on their intentions, but to no avail.

The problem the Fed has is not clarity - it's the credibility of its commitment to the new framework. The mkt is used to the old Fed and wants proof (beyond words) that the thinking has changed.
7/8 So, what should the Fed do? For sure, continue explaining its new framework. But the natural solution to the problem is yield curve control, which the Fed intended precisely as a tool to reinforce forward guidance and counter runaway market expectations.
8/8 I am not holding my breath that this will happen any time soon. But if the #Fed does not convince markets, Fed policy - de facto - has not changed. It’s as if the new framework never happened and the Fed is only paying lip service to it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roberto Perli

Roberto Perli Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @R_Perli

16 Mar
1/5 As promised, here are the results of our survey of expectations ahead to tomorrow' #FOMC meeting.

Respondents see strong growth this year and (substantially less so) later. But they don't see either the labor market close to maximum employment or inflation overshooting. Image
2/5 This notwithstanding, 77% or respondents see the Fed raising rates before the end of 2013. I read this, coupled with the modest forecast for inflation, as a sign that investors do not fully believe that the Fed is committed to its new average inflation targeting framework. Image
3/5 To be sure, the median and average trajectories for the funds rate that respondents have in mind are not aggressive. But the seeming lack of confidence in the new framework should be concerning to the #Fed. Expect further attempts at (verbal only) clarification. Image
Read 5 tweets
19 Aug 20
1/10 This incorrect reading (summarized in the story below) of what’s going on in the TIPS market is pervasive these days.

Here is a refresher of how to interpret signals from the TIPS market (thread).

@LizMcCormickWV @ctorresreporter @jbensondurham

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/10 The TIPS rate can be expressed as follows:

TIPS Rate =
Expected Average Real Fed Funds Rate +
Real Term Premium +
Liquidity Premium

The liquidity premium reflects normally lower liquidity in the TIPS vs nominal market (investors demand a premium to hold TIPS).
3/10 The breakeven rate can always be expressed as:

Breakeven Rate =
Expected Inflation +
Inflation Risk Premium -
Liquidity Premium

So, the liquidity *adds to* observed TIPS rates and *subtracts from* breakeven rates (that's b/c breakeven=nominal rate - TIPS rate).
Read 10 tweets
9 Apr 20
I am getting a significant amount of pushback against the Fed actions today, on the ground that they only help financial markets and not real people, and that the Fed is up to its old 2008 tricks.

I get the frustration, but I don't agree with the conclusion. Here is why. /1
First, the Fed’s objective is to preserve employment, not to bail out investors or reckless corporate types. Of course, the two are connected, but we should be a lot more agitated if the Fed disregarded its employment mandate to teach a lesson to leveraged businesses. /2
Second, the Fed is not doing this on its own — it’s doing it together with the Administration and Congress, which set money aside for the Fed to lever up. This is coordinated monetary and fiscal policy. It’s very different from what the Fed did in 2008, when it went it alone. /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!