When I was re-examining early Q suspects, I also took a fresh look at Paul Furber (a software engineer from South Africa, heavily involved in spreading QAnon off 4chan).
Q's use of "RC" to mean "registered charity" in drop 2 suggests someone from the Commonwealth, BUT...
Q's use of "RC" to mean "registered charity" in drop 2 suggests someone from the Commonwealth, BUT...
you'd have to have a messed-up sleep cycle to be making those posts from South Africa.
Maybe Furber DID, however. If he typically worked with American companies, it'd make sense to sync his day up with his colleagues'.
As always with Q stuff, the evidence is ambiguous.
Maybe Furber DID, however. If he typically worked with American companies, it'd make sense to sync his day up with his colleagues'.
As always with Q stuff, the evidence is ambiguous.
But anyway, these little scraps of evidence pointing at *several* different players -- and also the fact that the most interesting "I was Q" confession floating around out there points to a group being behind Q, as well -- inclines me to think that Q-as-group is very plausible.
It's just very hard to *evaluate* the scraps of evidence and can really feel like you're chasing your tail.
Plus, there's constant, CONSTANT danger of getting tunnel vision.
So I'm glad Hoback's film IS coming out bc it'll have (it sounds like) COMPLETELY fresh evidence. Nice!
Plus, there's constant, CONSTANT danger of getting tunnel vision.
So I'm glad Hoback's film IS coming out bc it'll have (it sounds like) COMPLETELY fresh evidence. Nice!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
