Thread by @malone_j71

Weird though he says Harry Daniels was there, he never showed Harry's thoughts on Metis citizenship?

https://twitter.com/LADYALEXANDRIA/status/1373255782368739330

RCAP 432 - Metis Circle Special Consultation - Ottawa - Harry Daniels was very specific in saying that Metie was meant for the purposes of 35 - Clearly meant and clearly stated to the Parliamentary Committee of the day. -Harry clearly stated to the federal officials to include

both halfbreed scrip takers and their descendants, conventionally called Red River Metis, and other persons of mixed blood ancestry who identify with Metis culture and history, which is localized and regionalized to adapt to the local history and culture of the region.

federal-court-ruling-harry-daniels-et-al-v-queen - Metis has gradually been broadened in common usage to include all people of mixed Indian and other ancestry who are not status Indians but who claim a culture distinction.

The People Who Own Themselves - Recognition of Metis Identity in Canada - Senate - YC28-0-411-12 - David Chartrand - families will eventually reclaim their Metis identity , as generations lose their status under the Indian Act over time.

Identity and Federalism- Understanding the Implications of Daniels v. Canada - Thomas Isaac and Arend Hoekstra - vol81 2019 - article 3. The Term 'Indigenous' in the Daniels case.

Daniels v. Canada, 2013 FC 6 (CanLII), [2013] 2 FCR 268 - Metis

sec 130 - Harry Daniels case describing the Metis represented. (Persons described in paragraph 117)

sec 117 - Harry Daniels case describing the core group of MNSI as a group of native people who maintained a strong affinity for their Indian Heritage without possessing Indian status sec. 117.

Now the federal gov - @CrownIndigenous , cozies up with Darryl Leroux, seems pretty fishy he gets all the funding he needs for his political research into who can be 'Indigenous' or not, A white male university professor. Bennet re-tweets his book and work. He doxes, harasses,

name-calls, gaslights and only targets Indigenous women who grew up secure in the native identities, it is who their families have always known themselves to be. What person can normally throw down a dog pedigree chart on their families at a moment notice when a twitter mob of

white academics hits you, demanding you show them that you are who you say you are? If they are upset these women got funding for their projects and work, that they thought were important and using their 'white coded privilege' in a manner to show support to their visible

'Indigenous brothers and sisters' and then get attacked on both sides for it. Darryl leads the white academic charge who are morally outraged on demand. And the other 'status' First Nations who are equally outraged and saying, no you are not one of us because this person who has

been colonized and doesn't belong to a recognized 'Indigenous' community anymore, gets told No, you are not one of us, the person being attacked has no chance of defending themselves.

Frank Palmater, father of now federally recognized, 'Status" Mi'kmaw lawyer Pam Palmater, knows all to well how that game works with the community recognition. It has all been politically arranged that way, so the feds can pick and choose who they decide to recognize. 432 RCAP

report - Frank Palmater - aboriginal ancestry = acceptance from whose community. Frank knows how the 'Identity Policy' has been "set up". Frank himself has self-identified numerous times in the Metis Circle Special Consultation Royal Commission on Aboriginal People report 432.

It is a lot of information to take in, I hope I have broken it down in small enough segments that people can understand and see what has been happening since the Metis and NonStatus Indians have been recognized as belonging under sec 91(24) in the Daniels Case.

www.dgwlaw.ca-2016 - Daniels Case Brief. - hopefully this helps to break down the Daniels case and understanding for people.

So you see now, why the 'important' work has started into attacking people about their identities online. That is illegal and goes against their human rights. That is why Canada is pushing so hard for bill C15, it will not then recognize any sovereign citizen, only those already

recognized by the federal government, who they pick and choose to have status, some of who do not even have any native blood.

Have you seen Ms Lamb torn apart by Darryl Leroux anywhere as a raceshifter? No, cause she is white and he only "targets" Indigenous Women.

https://twitter.com/malone_j71/status/1370031789545230339?s=20

NonStatus and Metis women, inherently have a right to their identity's. The Federal Gov, the white academic Darryl Leroux's of the world , and other First Nations, do NOT get to negate their identities. You can see in history what happened when that got to be a common place event

, with catastrophic consequences!! -- As Walker Connor says on Human Rights and the International Laws on self-identity, Corntassel, Jeff J., and Tomas Hopkins Primeau.Indigenous Sovereignty and International Law- Revised Strategies for Pursuing Self-Determination-” Human Rights

Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 2, 1995, pp. 343–365 -pg349. When governments go after their NonStatus and Metis citizens who are 'made' to be under their nation, they must be terrified when we women, who have always been the strength and backbone of our communities, say no, we remember

who we are, we remember our people, and we want to embrace all of our heritage, that gov's have tried to kill 'Indian Identity" for years, with all sorts of tactics, but we still have people standing up saying NO, I am who I am and you will not change that.

Harry Daniels explicitly wrote a letter to Kirby Lethbridge, president of the Labrador Metis Nation, saying who he meant to be 'Metis Citizens', it goes against all the Federal Gov and the MNC is trying to do. Royal Commission On Aboriginal Peoples Final Report Vol. 4 -

Perspectives and Realities- by Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1996 - Harry Daniels correspondence to Kirby Lethbridge.

Harry Daniels was the president of the Native Council of Canada, when Metis was repatriated into the 1982 constitution. Harry explicitly said he did not agree with the MNC's definition of Metis. Behind the Scene of the Send First Ministers Conference on Aboriginal Constitutional

Affairs-05190.vol15-3 Mar 1984 NewBreed- MNC trying to convince NCC on Metis Definition./ Constitutional meeting not a complete failure -Metis National Council definition not approved by NCC March 1984 - New Breed.

The Ontario Métis- characteristics and identity-by Evelyn Peters, Mark Rosenberg, & Greg Halseth 1991 - NCC has rejected MNC's definition of Metis.

The writing on the wall, couldn't be any clearer. The federal gov does not want to recognize "ALL" the Metis people, like they only choose certain First Nations to be the "Voice" of the First Nation peoples, they are trying to do the exact same thing through MNC. They are the

only group who gets funding, works with Darryl Leroux, gets university talks with only their "distorted" version of history being told. And, making sure "The Other Metis' and nonStatus people, never get a voice or a platform to be heard.

LAC - metis circle special consultation -- rock matte, claude aubin, frank palmater, kirby lethbridge, harry daniels, gary gould,viola robinson... etc etc

@threadreaderapp unroll