This thread is a much requested and long pending. Its about the story of King Ashoka and how it has been twisted over years. Let's begin.
Let's establish some facts first
1. Much of the details we know about Ashoka is from his inscriptions 2. Other details are found in Buddhist literature 3. Puranas mention Ashoka but no further details are found 4. Much of the literature about Ashoka is written centuries later
Now, lets start with Rock inscriptions first. These inscriptions are filled on his preaching about Dhamma and has been compared to propaganda by a politician by some scholars.
How, you may ask? Here, let's take example of his edict after Kalinga war where he allegedly faced remorse and turned into a buddhist suddenly. But his other inscriptions say otherwise.
Excerpt from King Aśoka and Buddhism by Anuradha Seneviratna.
Moreover, what most people don't know that is that two of the pillars were "discovered" by a forger archaeologist who was discredited in 1898 and the inscriptions don't match completely.
From Greek Buddha By Christopher I. Beckwith
What does this mean? It means the description Devānāṃpriya Aśoka is found only on late buddhist inscriptions and not on the earlier inscriptions.
It means that there are two distinctive inscriptions, one by Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśi (Maurya inscriptions) and other by Devānāṃpriya Aśoka (which is in overtly Buddhist tone)
This means that there were two Ashokas! The Mauryan Devānāṃpriya Priyadarśi and buddhist Devānāṃpriya Aśoka!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is the story of another paranormal encounter I had. This is not sequential to my earlier threads and happened in my 20s.
This was a time when I was studying for graduation was working as an intern in Lucknow. I was working in an old factory and this was outside the city area.
It was a large printing factory with history going back to at least 60 years. Obviously the infrastructure was quite old and people had said that they felt uneasy for decades working in the factory.
This thread will be for the all encompassing details of !slamic conquests of India which are "omitted" in the history books. Please read and review.
Just to start the conversation, here's one facts most people don't know. About 80 million people died in the time between 1000 AD and 1500 AD and population of India actually reduced to 120 million from 200 million in 1000 AD.
From Growth Of Muslim Population In Medieval India Ad 1000 1800 by K. S. Lal.
This thread will be to show the villification of Sanskrit language and its texts subtle brainwashing against it by NCERT syllabus. Excerpts are from Brainwashed Republic by Neeraj Atri.
So what do you understand from the below excerpt? Read carefully. "Common people do not know Sanskrit, only Brahmins do".
Now read what NCERT syllabus says about the roman empire and its use of languages.
This thread will be for cultural appropriation and conflict with local religions from Christianity throughout the world. It should be a framework and a reminder to how Christianity absorbs a local religion and annihilates it.
For first entry , let's take a very recent example. The Igbo religion from Nigeria. Excerpts from Conflicts Between African Traditional
Religion and Christianity in Eastern
Nigeria: The Igbo Example
Chukwuma O. Okeke1
, Christopher N. Ibenwa1
,
and Gloria Tochukwu Okeke1
So what exactly is Igbo religion, let's see how it is explained here.
Certainly. But what the Chinese as ever failed to take into account (by the sheer inability of all communists to understand patriotism) is how the armies and general population of India would respond. Bihar Regiment has already exorcised any ghosts of 1962.
To be exact, 1967 clash had already exorcised any ghosts from military but that was purposely buried from general consciousness for them to ALWAYS remember how China humiliated them by the Marxists historian. They tried that here too.
Just look at the report. Why would the scare of PLA death squads be thrown (after what they did in 1962) when in reality Bihar Regiment kicked all of their asses and literally broke them apart with their bare hands?
One thing was bugging me since yesterday, why would hans ambush Indian army with rods and engage in unarmed combat if they already had backstabbing in mind. This doesn't makes any sense in any tactic of war. There are two possibilities IMO.
1. Hans want India to look like an aggressor AND a weak aggressor on top of that. Nobody likes a weak bully, everyone cheers when he gets beaten up. 2. This wasn't supposed to happen, it's a rogue faction at work. Just like the GT reporter who "mistakenly" quoted Indian media.