🧵I am going to expand on the first point from @don_milton. See @linseymarr tweet below.

-How to achieve 10 L/s/Person (22 CFM/person) of outside air
-What does it mean in terms of 3’ to 6’ social distance.
-How to achieve >4 ACH
-Myths regarding air cleaning
Example used throughout the thread:

Classroom: 960 ft2
Specific dimension: 30' x 32'
Number of occupants: 30 (this is the design number, taking into account average classroom density - pre COVID)
1) Ventilation
By code, this classroom would have 415 CFM of airflow of outside air. This airflow is being forced through the HVAC system (unit in classroom or mechanical room).

By code, when designed, every classroom in United States need to comply with this requirement.
If we keep 6 ft distance --> we end up with 16 students, this means 12 l/s/person

If we reduce it to 3 ft -->we end up with 30 students (all kids will be back) --> 6 l/s/person
The 3 ft social distance will NOT meet the requirement of 10 l/s/person of @Don_Milton and also WHO new guidance. Dr @CorsIAQ pointed to 2x occupancy impact 👇🏾
and this is the BEST scenario in terms of outside air.

We know that schools are neglected and might not be able to meet the design outside airflow of 415 CFM, further exacerbating the issue.
Opening windows: It will NOT work all the time.

Ventilation experts warn that “simply opening windows and doors without the use of exhaust fan, does not ensure adequate filtration – dependent on natural driving forces caused by the difference in temp wind speed."
ASHRAE Standard 62.1 (the Standard that sets ventilation rates adopted by almost all cities and states) has three pages of detailed guidance of how to design for natural ventilation (opening windows).
Opening windows should be the last resort.

This should NOT be an excuse of not doing the basics of checking how much outside air is available through the HVAC system.

First use of funds:
- Hire a test and balance company
- Perform maintenance to restore outside air CFM
2) Filtration:

All experts agree that filtration is a key strategy.

a) Mechanical filters (MERV) are the most basic and cost effective solution with an established Standards.

Two things:
- how efficient are MERV filters?
- how costly?
Mechanical Filtration Efficiency:

Table from ASHRAE
MERV 8: 55%
MERV 11: 73%
MERV 13: 89%

Assume 0 OA:
MERV 13 will lead to 5 ACH
MERV 11 --> 4 ACH
MERV 8 --> 3 ACH
Both MERV 11 and MERV 13 will meet @Don_Milton 4 ACH suggestion.

Second use of funds:
- assess what filtration efficiency you need to buy and purchase filters
Mechanical Filtration cost:

Here is some good news...

The Yearly cost including two replacements of MERV 13 filters will be $28.
Let's assume it takes $5 of labor cost to install a filter.
Total cost per Year = $48

Please read this again. $48 to get >4 ACH.
Mechanical filtration myth:

Do NOT say that the HVAC system can not handle MERV 13. This is might be the case but it is unlikely to be TRUE.

Remember that also MERV 11 can be a good choice. This is backed by @ShellyMBoulder @MarcelHarmon1 and @JimRosenthal4
b) UVGI

Read here by Dr. @WBahnfleth, one of the top experts.

As with everything else, UVGI needs to be well designed, installed, and maitained.

ashrae.org/file%20library…
Do NOT confuse UVGI with UV-PCO:

- UVGI works by shining light on the air itself, thereby inactivating the virus.

- UV-PCO: UV is one of the component of Photocatalytic Oxidation technology. UV, in this case, will shine a light on a catalyst to produce oxygen species.
Be aware of misleading product description.

One example of many.

Yes for UV cleaning the air.
NO for UV-PCO.
c) Stand-alone air cleaners.

HEPA cleaners is the only proven technology: >99% efficiency to remove the virus.

Use in case you can NOT meet 4 ACH with filters + outside air.

For example: 0 outside air + no filtration -->
2x air cleaners of CADR = 350 --> will lead to 4.9 ACH.
Be aware of false marketing:
HEPA-like
HEPA-style
99% HEPA
HEPAsilent
HEPA Ultra
Ionic HEPA
HEPAFast
HEPA Efficiency
HEPA Functions
HEPA Action
Plasma HEPA
Super HEPA
HyperHEPA
HELPA
HPEA

are ALL subpar versions of what constitutes a HEPA air filter.

Either HEPA or NOT HEPA
Also be aware of CADR unit if it is in CFM or m3/hr. I had to return two devices twice after I figured this out.

For example, below CADR stated = 360. I assumed it is CFM. it turned out to in m3/hr, so CADR = 211 CFM.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marwa Zaatari

Marwa Zaatari Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marwa_zaatari

17 Mar
Check here for a Step-by-Step guidance how to choose an ionizer or a UV+catalyst device. Follow these simple 3 steps for proper selection! Image
Step 1: STOP 🛑 do not do it. Do not think about it. At best It does not work, at worst it produces harmful by-products.
Step 2: focus only MERV 13, Outside air, portable HEPA filtration, properly designed UVGI.
Read 4 tweets
17 Mar
I will show an equal love to another bi-polar ionization technology claiming the usual 99.99% and no by-products.

In this thread, I will discuss two studies one by FEMA/CDC and one by Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment (BTSA) NY versus the manufacturer claims.
Manufacturer claims no (ZERO) ozone production. Published test on the website from an outside lab:
atmosair.com/wp-content/upl…

Test Date = 2005
Independent testing by CDC/FEMA (1/2) - 2009:

After hurricanes Katrina and Rita, FEMA purchased provided temporary housing for families who were displaced by the storms and looked for air cleaners to reduce formaldehyde but decided first to test if they produce ozone.
Read 7 tweets
15 Mar
More results involving Electronic Air Cleaners. This time using Hydrogen Peroxide in the air for air/surface disinfection (PCO + DHP).

I will focus on the air disinfection results.

Results are from a chamber test 👇.
Principle of work per manuf.: the device produces dry hydrogen peroxide with max concentration of 20 ppb that is able to last long enough to diffuse throughout the space (half life is 30 - 60 mins; for comparison: half life of ions is in the seconds).

trane.com/content/dam/Tr…
Result from the in-duct device (Name = Blade DHP) show that the device is not very effective to reduce airborne concentration (<10% effective).

Note: You will need to subtract natural decay curve.
Read 4 tweets
9 Mar
The defeat of ions.

Thread about Needle Point Bi-polar Ionization.

What the manufacturer claims versus what independent studies report.
@ShellyMBoulder @jljcolorado @JimRosenthal4
What the manufacturer claims?
I will focus on three claims: reduction of PM count by agglomeration, surface inactivation of COV-2, removal of VOCs + formaldehyde.
-GPS+MERV 8 reduced particle count concentration by 89.7%
-GPS report 99.8% SARS-COV-2 surface inactivation
What the independent studies by subject matter experts found (device tested is produced by GPS).

Claim of reduction of particulate matter concentration: False.

Source: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@stephensbrent @etgall
Read 8 tweets
15 Feb
1) About MERV 13 - upgrading filters to MERV13 is the cheapest and most consistent/ practical solution:
For a 10,000 ft2 school buildings or 15 classrooms, it only costs $546/YEAR. This simple upgrade will give you ~5 ACH.
2) About air purifiers, it costs equal or more than $250 to put 1 purifier in 1 classroom (500 ft2) to give ~5 ACH.

Here is a collection of air purifiers available on the market (fan + HEPA filter) compared by cost/ft2 and noise.
3) About ventilation (1/3): if the building open the outside air dampers as designed (per minimum code), you get an extra 4.23 ACH.

-> A lot of studies found that schools are under ventilated because the operators chose to save energy (closing the outside damper on purpose)
Read 5 tweets
10 Feb
If my school building was running the way it was supposed to be run (compliant to minimum codes), how would it rate per Harvard-CU Boulder Air Exchange Rate Target?

In other words, are we asking too much from school buildings? 🧵

@j_g_allen
Classroom
- 500 ft2, 12 kids
- served by a central AC system

To obtain the certificate of occupancy (to be allowed to occupy the classroom), this classroom need to have minimum outside air according to building codes. This is by design and should be kept in operation.
1) The minimum outside air equal to 2.7 ACH.
2) The AC system has a filter - mainly installed to protect the heating and cooling coil - of MERV 8 (pretty common in school buildings). The filter + airflow will get you 2.67 ACH.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!