-How to achieve 10 L/s/Person (22 CFM/person) of outside air
-What does it mean in terms of 3’ to 6’ social distance.
-How to achieve >4 ACH
-Myths regarding air cleaning
Classroom: 960 ft2
Specific dimension: 30' x 32'
Number of occupants: 30 (this is the design number, taking into account average classroom density - pre COVID)
1) Ventilation
By code, this classroom would have 415 CFM of airflow of outside air. This airflow is being forced through the HVAC system (unit in classroom or mechanical room).
By code, when designed, every classroom in United States need to comply with this requirement.
If we keep 6 ft distance --> we end up with 16 students, this means 12 l/s/person
If we reduce it to 3 ft -->we end up with 30 students (all kids will be back) --> 6 l/s/person
The 3 ft social distance will NOT meet the requirement of 10 l/s/person of @Don_Milton and also WHO new guidance. Dr @CorsIAQ pointed to 2x occupancy impact 👇🏾
and this is the BEST scenario in terms of outside air.
We know that schools are neglected and might not be able to meet the design outside airflow of 415 CFM, further exacerbating the issue.
Opening windows: It will NOT work all the time.
Ventilation experts warn that “simply opening windows and doors without the use of exhaust fan, does not ensure adequate filtration – dependent on natural driving forces caused by the difference in temp wind speed."
ASHRAE Standard 62.1 (the Standard that sets ventilation rates adopted by almost all cities and states) has three pages of detailed guidance of how to design for natural ventilation (opening windows).
Opening windows should be the last resort.
This should NOT be an excuse of not doing the basics of checking how much outside air is available through the HVAC system.
First use of funds:
- Hire a test and balance company
- Perform maintenance to restore outside air CFM
2) Filtration:
All experts agree that filtration is a key strategy.
a) Mechanical filters (MERV) are the most basic and cost effective solution with an established Standards.
Two things:
- how efficient are MERV filters?
- how costly?
Assume 0 OA:
MERV 13 will lead to 5 ACH
MERV 11 --> 4 ACH
MERV 8 --> 3 ACH
Both MERV 11 and MERV 13 will meet @Don_Milton 4 ACH suggestion.
Second use of funds:
- assess what filtration efficiency you need to buy and purchase filters
Mechanical Filtration cost:
Here is some good news...
The Yearly cost including two replacements of MERV 13 filters will be $28.
Let's assume it takes $5 of labor cost to install a filter.
Total cost per Year = $48
Please read this again. $48 to get >4 ACH.
Mechanical filtration myth:
Do NOT say that the HVAC system can not handle MERV 13. This is might be the case but it is unlikely to be TRUE.
- UVGI works by shining light on the air itself, thereby inactivating the virus.
- UV-PCO: UV is one of the component of Photocatalytic Oxidation technology. UV, in this case, will shine a light on a catalyst to produce oxygen species.
Be aware of misleading product description.
One example of many.
Yes for UV cleaning the air.
NO for UV-PCO.
c) Stand-alone air cleaners.
HEPA cleaners is the only proven technology: >99% efficiency to remove the virus.
Use in case you can NOT meet 4 ACH with filters + outside air.
For example: 0 outside air + no filtration -->
2x air cleaners of CADR = 350 --> will lead to 4.9 ACH.
Be aware of false marketing:
HEPA-like
HEPA-style
99% HEPA
HEPAsilent
HEPA Ultra
Ionic HEPA
HEPAFast
HEPA Efficiency
HEPA Functions
HEPA Action
Plasma HEPA
Super HEPA
HyperHEPA
HELPA
HPEA
are ALL subpar versions of what constitutes a HEPA air filter.
Either HEPA or NOT HEPA
Also be aware of CADR unit if it is in CFM or m3/hr. I had to return two devices twice after I figured this out.
For example, below CADR stated = 360. I assumed it is CFM. it turned out to in m3/hr, so CADR = 211 CFM.
Manufacturer claims no (ZERO) ozone production. Published test on the website from an outside lab: atmosair.com/wp-content/upl…
Test Date = 2005
Independent testing by CDC/FEMA (1/2) - 2009:
After hurricanes Katrina and Rita, FEMA purchased provided temporary housing for families who were displaced by the storms and looked for air cleaners to reduce formaldehyde but decided first to test if they produce ozone.
More results involving Electronic Air Cleaners. This time using Hydrogen Peroxide in the air for air/surface disinfection (PCO + DHP).
I will focus on the air disinfection results.
Results are from a chamber test 👇.
Principle of work per manuf.: the device produces dry hydrogen peroxide with max concentration of 20 ppb that is able to last long enough to diffuse throughout the space (half life is 30 - 60 mins; for comparison: half life of ions is in the seconds).
What the manufacturer claims?
I will focus on three claims: reduction of PM count by agglomeration, surface inactivation of COV-2, removal of VOCs + formaldehyde.
-GPS+MERV 8 reduced particle count concentration by 89.7%
-GPS report 99.8% SARS-COV-2 surface inactivation
What the independent studies by subject matter experts found (device tested is produced by GPS).
Claim of reduction of particulate matter concentration: False.
1) About MERV 13 - upgrading filters to MERV13 is the cheapest and most consistent/ practical solution:
For a 10,000 ft2 school buildings or 15 classrooms, it only costs $546/YEAR. This simple upgrade will give you ~5 ACH.
If my school building was running the way it was supposed to be run (compliant to minimum codes), how would it rate per Harvard-CU Boulder Air Exchange Rate Target?
In other words, are we asking too much from school buildings? 🧵
Classroom
- 500 ft2, 12 kids
- served by a central AC system
To obtain the certificate of occupancy (to be allowed to occupy the classroom), this classroom need to have minimum outside air according to building codes. This is by design and should be kept in operation.
1) The minimum outside air equal to 2.7 ACH. 2) The AC system has a filter - mainly installed to protect the heating and cooling coil - of MERV 8 (pretty common in school buildings). The filter + airflow will get you 2.67 ACH.