We in the Chinese government hope that in the end, every U.S. Congressman's district will have Chinese investment, and China will be able to control one thousand or several thousand votes, and then we can influence his (the congressman’s) attitude.
Chinese figured out the Americans long back and went with a very clear headed objective with timelines. Kept the focus..
Americans only care about Money - they will do business with anyone & if China becomes big, they will accept it as it is too entwined.
"In fact, the U.S. House of Representatives can be controlled, because the United States has 312 million people, and 435 members of the House of Representatives.On average, a congressional district has about 750,000 people, 750,000 people's voter turnout is only 30%, that is,../1
about 200,000 votes can decide his fate (the fate of the congress candidate).
Generally speaking, the nos of votes for the two candidates are very close, the gap won’t be particularly large. So in the end, I guess there is only a difference of 10 thousand or several thousand..
votes. Therefore, if you can have several thousand votes in your hands, you are as good as his father/master.
If China conducts good cooperation in the US, we may be able to buy it over, and turn the US into our second Standing Committee of National People’s Congress."
This is what i call strategy and ability to remove the riff-raff and identify the domino
Look at the way China has progressed. EU, specifically Germans transferred most tech to China i.e. Siemens, Airbus manufacturing and many more out of "Bizness is Bizness..".
Americans were tough nut to crack so chinese stole it. who stole for China- Chinese origin Americans
Look at roster of people arrested for siphoning off tech to chinese. 99% of them are Chinese origin Americans in US companies, Nasa, Universities.
Do you remember 5 Indians transferring or stealing cutting edge research from west for India? I know of only 1 name..
Most Indian- Americans take their politics to America and can't differentiate between India the civilisation state and ruling party.
Over 98% of article dissing India in US today comes from people of indian origin. Chinese hate CCP but care for greatness of China..
Who is idiot & who love their nation? I meet extended family in US & hear only bad things about india and how it is a bad country, how it will never change and how lucky they are to be in US.
Chinese dream of middle kingdom & respect & Indians are house Negros
Indian could not even vote tactically to benefit or influence American policy on India..
My own family tells me how idiotic I have been to come back to India 13 years back and struggle. Sometimes the struggles get to you but overall, it was a good decision, created jobs here and will continue to contribute
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brain is formed by life experiences & since an individual doesn't keep doing what doesn't work (learns through trial and error), evolution has reinforced the behavior, values that help us survive and reproduce. This behavior must be the behavior that was adaptive in environment
in which humans spent most of their evolutionary history. The qn then becomes: What was the operating environment in which human brain evolved?
Human evolution started about 5-7 mln yrs ago & today's "modern" human brain appeared on the scene some 150,000 to 200,000 Yrs ago
For most of that time our ancestors lived in primitive hunter-gatherer societies as agriculture evolved some 12-15000 years ago. meaning over 99% of human evolution journey has been as hunter-gatherer & what made our fore bearers survive and evolve?
Nature doesn't care who gets selected for survival. Evolution has no goal. Another way to describe natural selection is as a process of elimination. Certain individuals survive because they have structural, physiological, behavioral or other characteristics that prevent them..
..from being eliminated. Those that don't have these characteristics are eliminated. Adapting to changes increases the chance that individual will survive, reproduce, and pass along its characteristics to the next gen. Greater resistance to disease, run faster, or learn to Sh$$t
When organisms undergo selection, some characteristic may be carried along that wasn't selected. Even if some trait didn't provide an advantage it could still be carried along as long as it isn't harmful, i.e., doesn't negatively influence survival and reproduction...
ਖਾਲਿਕੁ ਖਲਕ ਖਲਕ ਮਹਿ ਖਾਲਿਕੁ ਪੂਰਿ ਰਹਿਓ ਸ੍ਰਬ ਠਾਂਈ ॥:
Creation is in the Creator (God), and the Creator is in the Creation, totally pervading and permeating all places (sggs 1350).
Picked from
ईशा वास्यमिदं सर्वं यत्किञ्च जगत्यां जगत्।
तेन त्यक्तेन भुञ्जीथा मा गृधः कस्यस्विद्धनम् ॥
ईशावास्यं इदं सर्वं
ईश्वर बसा अणु कण मे है, ब्रह्माण्ड में व नगण्य में,
सृष्टि सकल जड़ चेतना जग, सब समाया अगम्य में
Most of the times Neo- Martial Sikhs were busy licking the feet of people sitting on throne of Delhi.. Including the letters written to Aurangzeb + fighting on side of English in 1857.. plenty of Singh Sabhas licking feet of English, wanting to be seen s separate from Hindus
HOWEVER, EVEN TEGH BAHADUR NEVER WAS A WARRIOR AGAINST THE MOGHUL EMPIRE; INDEED, THE BIRTH OF HIS SON GOVIND IN THE EASTERN CITY OF PATNA WAS A SOUVENIR OF HIS OWN ENLISTMENT IN THE PARTY OF A MOGHUL GENERAL ON A MILITARY EXPEDITION TO ASSAM.
At any rate, he stood firm as a Hindu, telling Aurangzeb that he loved his Hindu Dharma and that Hindu Dharma would never die,-a statement conveniently overlooked in most neo-Sikh accounts
Sikhs were such a martial race that they were beaten by Bengal Army twice comprising of 50% Brahmins and Rajputs each from East UP.
Stop this nonsense of Martial race and all.. Rajputs, Marathas, Jats (non-Sikh), Brahamins, Kurmi, Yadav have been fighting Invaders for centuries
Only Sikhs had an empire was under Maharaja Ranjit Singhji & he considered himself a Hindu. Neither before, nor after Sikhs empire. Were busy stabbing each other in back before and resorted to the same post his death.
Rajputs + brahmins taught them to fight & led them along..
If Sikhs were such martial Quam then how they could not protect Dileep Singh from taken away & made a X'tian? Thoo..Shame on the so called bravery if you can't protect and die for your honour. Singh Sabhas were busy licking feet of English instead of fighting to save Dileep singh
Modi ji can keep on giving out facts that we hv purchased Rs49000Cr worth of Daal in 5 yrs vs CONgress purchased 650cr in 5, even Punjab farmers know it, the fight is to stay in village, affording lifestyle guaranteed in law in name of MSP & not slugging in factories..
@nstomar ji, This outsized share of Punjab in FCI buying must be bought down to their share of produce..17% for wheat & 10 odd% for Rice.
Why should poor West Bengal, Karnataka, UP farmer fund the lifestyle of Punjab farmer?
Let me shock u. Avg landholding/household in Punjab is 5/6 acres against a national avg of 2.5acre, meaning double of national avg.
Now Shocking details, 45% of Pujab's rural population are landless, meaning the actual avg of landholding could be 10acres of landholding families