The CP Pharmaceuticals plant in Wrexham can be eliminated here - it does fill and finish - see itv.com/news/wales/202…
4/16
By contrast the Seneffe 🇧🇪 plant that Thermo Fisher Scientific acquired from Novasep in January and manufactures as well is *not* mentioned in this early stage
These firms / plants were in from the start
Oxford Biologica / 🏭 Oxford 🇬🇧
Cobra Biologics / 🏭 Keele 🇬🇧
Halix / 🏭 Leiden 🇳🇱
This came later
Novasep, later Thermo Fisher Scientific / 🏭 Seneffe 🇧🇪
6/16
Why does this matter?
AZ CEO, in his interview with @StefanieBolzen of Welt, states that UK plants will supply UK needs first. About 1/3 of the way through, important bit in screenshot
There has been an argument about whether that commitment to UK Govt indeed contractual or not. We do not know because the *earlier* UK Govt - Oxford contract is not public, but we know de facto that is what has been happening - UK plants supplying the UK doses
8/16
What what about... Halix 🇳🇱?
Soriot does not mention that plant, but Halix has been in the consortium from the beginning.
Also in the past fortnight there's been barely a peep about Seneffe, but there's been a lot of noise about Halix.
9/16
Could it be that the production from the Halix plant is covered by the earlier contract, in the same way as production from Oxford Biologica & Cobra Biologics are? And hence the UK Government thinks it is entitled to the *entire* production from Halix too?
10/16
Then comes the mystery about the MHRA and EMA authorisations for Halix.
Halix has not been authorised by either as far as we know, while the delay for EMA authorisation is unexplained: ft.com/content/8e2e99…
But in terms of the numbers, at least from 31 January until now, this is immaterial - dose exports even from an unauthorised plant - would still have to be declared to the European Commission, so some sort of non-authorisation to trick the Commission wouldn't have worked
12/16
In other words: the non-authorisation of Halix is odd, but I do not think it changes anything in the fundamental calculation here. It will be authorised by the EMA this week, multiple sources state
13/16
Here's how to understand all this:
First, leave Seneffe out of it - that supplies EU
Second, as far as UK is concerned, production from Halix is considered the same as Oxford Biologica & Cobra Biologics, i.e. all production from those goes to UK until UK vaccination done
14/16
Third, as far as the EU is concerned, all four plants - Seneffe, Halix, Oxford Biologica and Cobra Biologics - are in their contract with AZ, but they're only getting supply from 1 of the 4, while UK gets supply from 2 of the 4, with Halix still to be decided
15/16
Conclusion: UK knows it's in a stronger contractual position re. Halix, while EU says plant is in EU so should supply the EU
There are 2 possible outcomes I think: either UK concedes something as show of goodwill, or EU imposes export ban *because there's no other option*
16/16
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thanks to good work by @JamesCrisp6 and an initial discussion about "Europe" as opposed to "EU" in a statement, now clarified, this is what I *think* the situation is
There are 29 million AZ 💉 doses at Anagni 🇮🇹
AZ states 13 million of these are destined for COVAX countries, and 16 million for the EU (10 million this month and 6 million next month)
We don't know what % of the doses contain vaccine from Halix 🇳🇱 and Seneffe 🇧🇪
Most importantly it claims there are 4 million AZ doses at Halix in Leiden
Is it even worth having a fight this major over that number of doses? Perhaps. But either way this won't solve either UK or EU's supply headaches
"The first target of the possible export ban is AZ's Halix site in Leiden. The EU suspects AZ has hesitated to apply for authorization of the site to the EMA to deliver to the UK first"
Not important. Authorized or not, export stats would still have to be submitted to Commission
OK, now I have found time to look at von der Leyen's actual words earlier... the whole statement is here: ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
Highlighted bit is what got everyone excited
"countries, who have higher vaccination rates" can only really refer to the UK and USA at this stage (Israel does not have its own production just now AFAIK)
"whatever tool we need to deliver on that" has been interpreted as the Commission wanting to use Article 122 TFEU
After all the fuss in the UK press earlier this week that some European countries were somehow punishing the UK vaccine, I decided to take a look at how German public broadcaster ARD frames this on the website of its news programme Tagesschau tagesschau.de
🧵 1/10
For non-Germans: Tagesschau is the evening news on ARD, one of the two national public broadcasting TV channels. Its website is the place you go for a quick but bland overview of what's going on in the news. Something like the BBC News website
2/10
Separating out all the search terms is a bit tricky, but here is a rudimentary effort