A bit about the lockdown economy & why it may appear that, despite many businesses being decimated, others (including the economy as a whole) seem in no hurry to exit. With public co’s having reported, we can now look back on 2020 in full.
1/13
For my non-finance followers, 1 thing to understand is the economy—like a stock index—is effectively capitalization-weighted. This means the biggest companies have the most impact & the smallest are mostly irrelevant, both w/r/t econ metrics & co’s influence on gov/policy
2/13
Below is a good visual of what I mean using the S&P500. The 5 biggest companies have a weighting equal to the bottom 350. So you can barely see a company like General Motors worth $75B, let alone a local shop that—pre-lockdown—made $75k/yr & might be worth $1m (if public).
3/13
These companies are MASSIVE and got a lot bigger during lockdown (around ~50% bigger, charts to follow):
Apple: $2.01 trillion
Microsoft: $1.74 trillion
Amazon: $1.55 trillion
Google: $1.37 trillion
Facebook: $826 billion
4/13
As noted above, in our crony capitalist environment, these co's weight also applies to their influence/pressure on govt policies. So how did 2020 go for the big 5? Let’s look. *Note these aren’t the biggest % movers (eg pharma), just the biggest co’s with the most impact.
5/13
Amazon, in Q4 ‘20, reported QUARTERLY rev. of $125B, exceeding $100B in one qtr for the 1st time, annual sales at $386B, up > 38% from ‘19
Amazon also hired 500,000 people (!!), increasing employees 63% over ‘19. I’ve read 10Ks for 2 decades and never seen anything like that
6/13
Microsoft reported QUARTERLY rev. of $43B, up 17% from last yr, beating expectations by $3B. Its profits were up 34% year over year (YoY). Its cloud business grew 50% YoY due to “the dawn of a second wave of digital transformation sweeping every company and every industry”
7/13
Apple reported the next day and its numbers were even more spectacular. Quarterly revenue was a record $111.4 billion, up 21% from a year ago, beating consensus estimates by an astonishing $8.5B. Apple generates $50 million in sales every HOUR. Profits were up 35% YoY.
8/13
Alphabet (Google parent) reported astounding figures Feb 3, like qrtrly rev. of $57B, up 45% from last year! Their advertising segment benefitted from "the shift toward a digital economy" (lockdown). YouTube now reaches more 18-49 yr olds than all other TV networks combined
9/13
Facebook reported earnings Jan 27 for Q4 ‘20 that were 52% (!!) higher than Q4 ‘19, with total rev. up 33%. They have 2.7B monthly active users (MAUs) with all eyeballs “working” from home
Do you think any of these companies are in a hurry for things to go back to normal?
10/13
The message here is that the biggest co’s in the S&P500 (a benchmark for the US economy) have literally never performed better. Nothing wrong with that. But we shouldn’t be surprised they & their employees aren’t in any hurry to exit lockdown, despite its broad devastation.
11/13
If these co's were drowning-rather than your local bars, shops, theaters, venues,etc-we'd be out of lockdown already. Worth noting they are all HQd in lockdown states
Lockdowns also cause the Fed to keep low interest rates, which drives up valuations for growth companies
12/13
1 yr ago today, Dr. Ioannidis wrote the below. I read it that day, agreed with nearly every word, and still do. Worth revisiting in full, but I’ve captured a few key quotes below along with my own commentary
“we dont know how long social distancing measures and lockdowns can be maintained without major consequences to the economy, society, and mental health. Unpredictable evolutions may ensue, including financial crisis, unrest, civil strife, war, and a meltdown of the social fabric”
“How long, though, should measures like these be continued if the pandemic churns across the globe unabated”
I’d love to know. We never should have implemented such devastating & unprecedented “temporary” measures without defined exit criteria.
3/8
A revised look at who gets to work from home. Remember this the next time someone says "if only people would just listen"
Total US salaries & wages have surpassed pre-pandemic levels, except there are now 9.5 million fewer people w jobs.
How is that possible? Simple: the rich got richer while the poor got poorer. This is the inverse of what most lockdown supporters profess to desire in society.
Those earning >$85k were never impacted by job losses. Those earning <$30k on the other hand nearly hit 40% unemployment in April and are still ~15%. For comparison, unemployment hit 10% in the financial crisis. Note the rate for this group tanked again during winter lockdowns.
Statements like this from Pfizer remind me of Warren Buffett's quip "Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut."
(1/6)
Pfizer has said it expects $15 billion in 2021 revenue attributable to its COVID vax. For comparison, its total 2020 revenue was ~$42 billion, with its best-selling product Prevnar 13 (introduced 10 years ago) contributing just under $6 billion.
(2/6)
So the COVID vax will instantly become Pfizer's best selling product by 2.5 times and represent a ~35% increase in total company gross revenue. For a 170-year old stodgy $200B market cap company, that is other-worldly growth.
The 10,000-Foot View: Forever Lockdown Unraveling?
A short (for me) thread on what I perceive as the current macro situation (warning: contains some optimism)
1) I believe many have overestimated the degree to which people “like” lockdown. Sure, there are some.
1/15
But rather, they might simply “support” it as they believe it to be a necessary part of our societal approach to the virus due to that claim having been repeated ad nauseum in MSM.
2/15
Further, they have merely been inconvenienced by lockdown (the Zoom class) rather than decimated (working class), so they lack any incentive to question the prevailing narrative and instead conform to what is perceived as the virtuous course of action.
So, R. Weingarten, President of the AFT and future recipient of TIME’s inaugural Worst Person of the Year award, is out gloating about how the new CDC school “reopening” guidelines are similar to what the AFT proposed in April 2020. Yes…one year ago. 1/20
First, it is obviously preposterous to look to guidelines (from a labor union) issued in the early stages of a pandemic (including raw case numbers despite 70x testing volume now) prior to much better data/science/studies being made available. But I’ll play along.
2/20
What did we know in April ‘20 about child/school transmission? Here are 15 studies/articles along w a key quote/synopsis from each.
Again, all of this has only been further solidified over the last 10 months. I’m just pretending we're stuck in April 2020 like the AFT-CDC.
3/20
Recapping 4 substantive threads: (1) 30 papers on lockdown inefficacy, (2) "lockdown" just means sacrificing the poor, (3) California's reopening is mathematical fraud, & (4) COVID lessons from free markets.