This strikes me as hypocritical, given his own conduct.
In this study, Dr Munro said there was "no increase in death". That was so for younger adults, but not those aged >65, who had an increased risk of death from COVID-19.
Mocking Dr Leonardi for suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection might have long-term health consequences is not okay.
It's also quite ignorant.
In remote Australia, we have a huge problem with rheumatic heart disease, which is caused by group A streptococcus infection.
A sore throat is actually often the first sign of infection. If untreated, it can lead to lasting heart damage. rhdaustralia.org.au
Rheumatic heart disease is one of the major reasons why Aboriginal Australians have a lower life expectancy than non-Indigenous Australians (about 8 years less).
Dr Munro may never have encountered a case, because it's generally rare in the Western world, but not here.
Dr Munro was also dismissive of a mysterious inflammatory syndrome that began to affect children in early 2020.
We now know that condition as PIMS/MIS-C, and it's established that infection with SARS-CoV-2 is the cause.
Disagreements are to be expected, of course. And even if the science is settled there may be many possible policy responses. Spirited debate about the direction we should take is inevitable. But I hope the authors of the piece will reflect on their own conduct as we move forward.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1/7) Pre-print study (interpret carefully) showing that monkeys infected with SARS-CoV-2 developed abnormal proteins in their brains (Lewy bodies) that are linked to the development of Parkinson's disease and a type of dementia.
(1/8) Study of 12 million adults in England, showing that living with children during the second wave was associated with an increased risk of testing positive or being hospitalised for #COVID19.
Why do I predict COVID-19 will become a disease of children in 2021?
In developed countries, the majority of adults should be vaccinated by the end of the year.
But children probably won’t be, and so the virus will predominantly circulate in children and adolescents.
Additionally, many countries are still not doing enough to protect schools. There may even be pressure to completely end *all* public health measures once adults are vaccinated.
Under these conditions, the virus will spread unchecked in children and adolescents.
(2/8) First up, the authors found a strong association between the amount of neutralising antibodies a vaccine induces, and its efficacy.
Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273), and Novavax (NVX-CoV2373) are in the top right corner.
(3/8) Based on the limited data for mRNA vaccines available to date, the authors estimated that the half-life for vaccine-induced antibodies (65 days) was similar to those produced by infection (58 days).
(1/4) More evidence SARS-CoV-2 is airborne. In this report of 3 cases, proven by sequencing, ordinary surgical masks and face shields were not able to prevent aerosol transmission.
(2/4) It’s important to remember that this does not mean that surgical masks are completely ineffective.
They do prevent transmission much of the time, but they are not foolproof.
Partial protection is better than no protection, and there are ways to improve mask effectiveness.
(3/4) The authors recommend the following:
➡️ Improving mask fit by using ties, rather than ear loops
➡️ Adding mask filters
➡️ Switching to a P2/FFP2/N95 mask if available (although this may be more appropriate for doctors caring for patients, or in regions with high incidence)
Australians (including me) risk fines for sharing information about vaccines on social media.
Advertising medications direct to consumers was already prohibited in Australia (for good reason), but recent guidance about COVID-19 vaccines approaches censorship.
It seems social media posts comparing the efficacy of different vaccines may be considered advertising by Australia’s regulator (the TGA), because they could lead people to seek out a particular vaccine.
Additionally, pharmacies, doctors, and organisations that are part of the COVID-19 vaccination programme are banned from advertising whether they are using the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccine, and must instead use official government materials. smh.com.au/business/compa…