Interesting tidbit-
Kevin o'Leary thinks in future we'll start checking location that coins were mined, and discriminate against those mined with non-renewable. He calls China-mined as toxic.
@CathieDWood sees no inflation, only GOOD deflation.
"Supply bottlenecks and inflation do not survive in modern democracies "
HELP NEEDED!
I need your help for a video I'm making.
Do you recall a movie scene (or music vid, cartoon etc) where ppl
turn light on and find something huge/surprising/frightening/important
OR see one thing and then something else big hidden behind it or in plain sight?
1/..
2/ My video is on a hot topic and shows something people didn't notice, probably bc other things drew their attention, so it's either I turn the light on this topic (and show what was in dark) or i show something people didn't see bc focused on something else.
..
3/
Any help would be appreciated so there will be a shoutout to anyone that helps.
Even if you don't find something, just ask clarification questions - i'll mention you (unless you ask not to) so please think for a moment whether you recall such a scene.
Thanks guys!
YEAH, BUT >>> (Re: CHOWDHRY on TESLA)
Sure I agree with Chowdhry that VW's lagging Tesla, and I too don't see them catching up technologically in the near future.
But a champion's deadliest enemy is Hubris, so I'd like to put a few things straight.
VW showed their scaling-up plans, that they're fully committed this time - and they do seem that way.
TBH that's MORE important than the stats.
Example - does it matter if Mach-E has excellent or bad stats when it's a dead end?
3/ Tesla does have a huge lead but it's wrong to assume it's a 10 year one.
True that no automaker matches 2012 Model S range - but that doesn't mean once they do it'll take them 9 years to get to current Tesla tech.
A. Inventing is harder than copying, and they know
YESTERDAY + PETER LYNCH + @CathieDWood = #HODL
When Peter Lynch ran Magellan, annualized return over 13 years was >29%, yet average investor in fund only got 7%.
Could be statistical reasons for this (e.g. fewer investors in HUGE years, many in slow years) BUT MAINLY ... 1/
2/ ... but mainly it's a matter of undisciplined investor behavior.
Noobs see a fund (or stock) booming, so they buy, often at peaks and ATHs.
Then once it goes down - they sell in panic and head to the shore of safer investments (value stocks, cash etc)
..
3/ Conceptually that's "buy high, sell low" which is bad, but there's also another major problem.
Pulling out means missing days like yesterday ( $ARKK +10%, $TSLA +20%).
Single days can be SIGNIFICANT, and after strong declines such days can show BRUTAL upswings
Enter Google, then click the logo drawing. There's a short anomated vid about women acheivements - Curie, Braille, Typewriter, Nobel prize laureates etc.
Real nice, I just wish they'd spelled it out with subtitles. Most people watching the vid wouldn't even know what it's about.
Anyway - So many women moved humanity forward in Science, Technology, Art, Philosophy, etc and/or in "just" taking care of their loved ones - despite the odds often tilted against them
Looking forward to a future where gender gaps are a thing of the past and equality prevails
PS small tidbit but telling -
In recent years more women purchased electric guitars than men did. Women can express their voice, and it's different from men's - which makes music fresh and interesting again ๐๐ถ๐ธ๐ต๐น