I can't resist having references to "Out here in the fields" and "Teenage wasteland", but at your request I've made a second version with no distractions:
And yes, it's very strange that Sinologists don't read reconstructions aloud, especially when it comes to medieval poetry. Sound is an integral part of poetry; you'd think scholars of poetics would be falling all over themselves to recite the sounds of the poems as written.
Can you imagine scholars of Old English literature thinking about, talking about, or analyzing Beowulf without reciting it aloud in the original?
Yet that practice is the norm for dealing with ancient Chinese poetry. I've never understood it. Perhaps it's a failure of my field
that we have not provided the tools to make it easy for scholars of literature to do so.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ve worked up a minute-long video recitation of a brief passage from the 3rd-century BCE Shāng Jūn Shū 商君書 (Book of Lord Shang) to try to give a feel for what the language might have sounded like around the time these words were first written. 1/
For the content, I chose the first few sentences from Chapter 2, Kěn Lìng 墾令 (Order to Cultivate Waste Lands), in response to this video and request from @stateswarring . For Old Chinese, I used Axel Schuessler (2009). 2/
I often recommend Schuessler’s “Minimal Old Chinese” reconstruction system to students of ancient China who aren’t specialists in historical phonology. It’s based on the framework of William Baxter’s influential 1992 Old Chinese, but strives to be less speculative. 3/
@Tao_Collective@KIRINPUTRA@viroraptor@homosappiest@xiao_collective@catielila@BadLingTakes They aren't commensurate, for several reasons: (1) The textual record is incomplete, much is lost to us. So there might be words attested only in texts that haven't survived. (2) Because writing is employed only in certain socio-cultural contexts and is not a precise