The Heritage Foundation! The Crown Under Fire: Why the Left’s Campaign to Cancel the Monarchy and Undermine a Cornerstone of Western Democracy Will Fail! Waiting for Heritage Public Programs to start the webinar...
"The British monarchy shares the tradition of American exceptionalism..." <-- That's definitely a new one!
"This is the all-star panel!"
"The British Monarchy is one of the most consequential conservative institutions in history"
"In 1215, the Monarchy agreed that not even the king was above the law" <-- King John would find this news
"All of these rights were exported from Britain's constitutional monarchy" <-- the idea that we have our rights as a gift of grace from His Majesty is... weird...
I would not be proud of having brought Boris Johnson to 10 Downing Street if I were you...
Boris Johnson has a "Social Justice Advisor"?
Good God! Now they are blaming BREXIT on Margaret Thatcher!
Ian Duncan Smith trying to pull the panel back to sanity—that the symbolic head of state should not be a _politician_... but a dignified symbol of national unity, for example: not afraid to get vaccinated & urge others to do so.
Does he understand that Heritage is vax-sceptical?
"not a scintilla of racist beliefs within the royal family" <-- pure 100% classism, then? Cf.: Margaret Thatcher the grocer's daughter's loathing for Balmoral...
We are not royalists as realists! 65% pro-royal!
"Is it worth my time following around a 94 year old woman in her daily life? There's a market!... Ordinary people elevated to celebrities and showing their human side..." Camilla-gate is the moment when the public loves them best, when they are seen to be fallible...
Meghan & Harry overshared... abandoned Britain in its hour of need...
Why have they left their 94 year old grandmother & her 99 year old husband in their hour of need?
Why did Harry & Meghan feel that they had to throw a grenade and then run away from the wreckage? Sussexes as bullies...
Tim Montgomery: politics in the head of state means that there is no escape from politics—but politics should not be the dominant part of a nation's life... the royal family understand that tradition, history, family, service, charity, faith are more important than politics
"The nation's granny..."
The queen's approval is much higher than the monarchy generally... the divisiveness of Charles... Sympathy for Charles will cement his accession & keep the institution going for decades yet...
"Why does the LEFT despise the monarchy?" <-- Maybe Thomas Jefferson would have ideas? "The Far Left wants to cancel the monarchy, which represents all our conservative values—western civilization, our heritage"
The English on the panel want to see the monarchy as a non-political social-network symbol of national unity and concern. This Heritage nutboy Nile Gardiner wants the Monarchy to be the jawbone of an ass that can be wielded by the right in the culture war...
"Most Americans love the Queen", says Nile Gardiner... <-- in the same sense that Americans love potato chips, yes...
"How should Boris Johnson respond to American politicians' criticizing the British Monarchy", asks Joseph Loconte...
"Who hasn't made a mistake in their family life?" says Iain Duncan Smith...
"I have never criticized the institution of the presidency" says Iain Duncan Smith. Why not? I cannot follow him. If you have never criticized the institution of the presidency, there is something wrong with you...
Prince Charles described as "a kind-hearted fellow; a bit weak in trying to arbitrate between his warring sons..."
Edward IV, George Duke of Clarence, Richard Duke of Gloucester <-- There was some sibling rivalry for you!
"A complete lack of introspection on the sofa by Harry & Meghan" <-- Camilla Tominey
"A great deal of personal sacrifice" <-- Camilla Tominey on how hard HM's life has been...
"For people to repeat the allegation that there was a member of the royal family who was worried how 'dark' Meghan's children would be" "To constantly be looking for racism in institutions that have held us together" <-- Tim Montgomery
Isn't this just "DON'T MENTION THE WAR!"
"There is not a shred of racism in the royal family" "the royal family has a history of using inappropriate language" "Prince Harry used the P-word" <-- Camilla Tominey
"It's just tarred them all with this brush!" <--Camilla Tominey
"Why is America trying to export its obsession with race to Britain" <--Joseph Leconte
"The interview a cruise missile strike against the British monarchy... a dagger at the heart" <-- Nile Gardiner
"Attacks on the British monarchy are attacks on the U.K. itself" <-- Nile Gardiner
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION REQUIRES THAT THERE BE A BUST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL IN THE Oval Office <-- Gardiner
The British government must respond to these attacks from the WH, HR, & MO <-- Gardiner
"This is not the first time that an American administration has behaved badly with respect to Britain! Roosevelt would not meet privately with Churchill at Yalta!" <-- Joseph Leconte
The Heritage people--Nile Gardiner & Joseph Leconte--desperately want the British government & crown to attack Meghan & Harry & all their "sympathizers" inside the U.S. as a move in U.S. politics. The Englishmen have a very different view—that we all need mutual respect & see
how much England & America have in common. Heritage wants a fight. The English[wo|]men want to sing "kumbaya". & the English[wo|]men are horrified and trying to redirect it away from "let's fight!"
Sir Iain is brutal in his sotto voce attack on his Heritage hosts: "we deserve better than for this to be made a partisan political agenda for a domestic audience"
Tim Montgomery: What we ought to be talking about rather than whether we like Harry & Meghan is what to do about this rise of China!
Camilla Tominey: Long live the Queen! And long may the royals rule over my mortgage! Royals on a pedestal well above even the Hollywood A-list!
Camilla Tominey: "The great affection between the Obamas and HM..."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I used to think that I would—someday—understand why Stern-Gerlach magnets arranged along the x-axis would knock an electron that was in the <↑| state in the z-basis into the z-basis <↓|. And I used to think I would—someday—understand why if we... 1/
rotated the magnets into the y-direction the little square-root-of-minus-one i’s would start appearing in the math…
Now I know that it is hopeless.
And, similarly, it is hopeless to ask why the triple measurement σ(1x)σ(2y)σ(3z) applied to the three electrons 1, 2, & 3... 2/
that are in Coleman’s entangled (<↑↑↑| - <↓↓↓|) state always produce the answer +1.
It is the Pauli matrices that are the underlying reality—or, at least, are our only through-a-glass-darkly shadowy and illusory simulacrum of understanding. They are not the things... 3/
The point of departure for the overwhelming bulk of discussions of macroeconomic management from the accession of Arthur Burns to the accession of Jay Powell to the Chairship of the Federal Reserve was the adaptive-accelerationist Phillips curve.
What is the adaptive-accelerationist Phillips curve? It is the belief that the next year’s inflation rate will be equal to the inflation rate that labor and product markets expect—which is adequately proxied by what inflation has been #EGgrantee#EG2021 2/
@Noahpinion GDP by 4-7%? The vibe in Boskin's piece is **very** defensive: "the end product usually diverges from what economists would consider ideal. ..." "the current tax bill could, in principle, have been better..." "the question, then, is whether a viable final bill will be better2/
@Noahpinion than the status quo..." "I certainly respect Summers and Furman’s right to their views..." "there are legitimate differences of opinion..." "the actual tax provisions people and businesses will be required to use have yet to be written..." Now if I had just played a role 3/
I find myself more with @tomscocca here than you. You write <slowboring.com/p/whats-wrong-…> 'The problem here, to me, is not that Walker ought to “stick to sports.” It’s that the analysis is bad. But because it’s in a video game console review rather than a policy analysis 1/
@mattyglesias@tomscocca section and conforms to the predominant ideological fads, it just sails through to our screens...'
And then you say: 'What actually happened is that starting in March the household savings rate soared.... Middle class people are seeing their homeowners’ equity rise and... 2/
@mattyglesias@tomscocca their debt payments fall, while cash piles up on their balance sheets...' This makes sense as a criticism of Ian Walker only if you think that when Ian Walker wrote 'I’d be remiss to ignore all the reasons not to be excited for the PlayStation 5...', it was meant to be the 3/
Matthew C. Klein, "Trade Wars are Class Wars." Fr 2020-11-13 12:00 PM PST: Trade Wars are Class Wars: How Rising Inequality Distorts the Global Economy and Threatens International Peace." The talk will be moderated by Professor Brad DeLong (Economics) 1/
Trade disputes are usually understood as conflicts between countries with competing national interests, but as Matthew C. Klein and Michael Pettis show, they are often the unexpected result of domestic political choices to serve the interests of the 2/
rich at the expense of workers and ordinary retirees. Klein and Pettis trace the origins of today’s trade wars to decisions made by politicians and business leaders in China, Europe, and the United States over the past thirty years. Across the world, 3/
The sad thing is that so few got what I think is the principal message: In a full-employment flex-price economy, when you hit the zero lower bound the economy deals with it by generating inflation. If 1/
@paulkrugman think—as I do—that the task of the central bank is to make Say's Law true in practice even though it is false in theory & to mimic what a full-employment economy would do, that means: when you hit the zero lower bound, generate inflation.
But lots of people did not get that. 2/
@paulkrugman I find myself particularly thinking about Bernanke, whose take on Japan princeton.edu/~pkrugman/bern… was that its depression was self-induced, and that claims of monetary-policy impotence violated an arbitrage condition. So prolonged depression was the central bank's fault.