2 years later, guilters still cluelessly try to justify James' train station lie as depicted from 88-90 "like when you're first dating somebody—the sexual relationship is growing."
There is no discrepancy in his affidavit & 3 amendments that "all abuse ended in 92," pre-station.
There is no discrepancy in his affidavit & 3 amendments that "all abuse ended in 92," pre-station.
Relying on Dimond's 2014 article that James "was molested from 10 to about 14 or 15" does nothing to address the narration of LN that this occurred during the earliest part of their relationship, or how their relationship was tapering off by 1990, or how all "abuse" ended by 92.
Dan's own original excuse also tried to shift James' abuse story to 1994.
Apparently oblivious to 5 years of litigation to the contrary, his own film describing this occurring early on (between 1987 & 1990 interludes) & his own media narrative that MJ abandoned kids at puberty.
Apparently oblivious to 5 years of litigation to the contrary, his own film describing this occurring early on (between 1987 & 1990 interludes) & his own media narrative that MJ abandoned kids at puberty.
Flashback to my megathread of wild guilter excuses they came up with to try and defend an impossible lie during the first three months alone.
By then, there were already 17 different excuses, each more ridiculous than the last. They're still trying 😂
By then, there were already 17 different excuses, each more ridiculous than the last. They're still trying 😂
https://twitter.com/MJJRepository/status/1142253183349198849
A documentarian with an honest interest in being impartial and interested in truth-seeking would not rely on debunked falsities and tabloid spin to justify an outright lie, while dismissing empirical evidence in the form of photographs, videos, land records and testimonials.
🤥
🤥
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
