Part two of my push to call out blatant lies & deliberately misleading campaign material. Sadly we're going to have to talk about @CStevensonSNP again.
In this case it's to call out the misleading (and, in my opinion, quite shameless) [1/15]
Here is a tweet from Collette Stevenson, Candidate for East Kilbride. Number 44 in her boast of 50 SNP achievements is 'Care For All'
'Free personal and nursing care extended to everyone who needs it, regardless of age'.
Sounds great, but she's leaving some things out[2/15]
First of all, the real thanks for free personal care in Scotland to under-65s should go to Amanda Kopel. She tirelessly led a campaign which began with a petition to MSPs at Holyrood back in 2013.[3/15]
Her husband was Frank Kopel, the former Dundee United footballer. He had been diagnosed with dementia at 59. Too young to qualify for free care, Mrs Kopel set out to ensure anyone living with disabilities and degenerative conditions could access support, regardless of age.[4/15]
She continued the campaign after her husband sadly passed away. So, personally, I think this brave and selfless lady deserves quite a bit more credit. More than some unknown (jobbing) SNP candidate, erasing the role Ms Kopel played, so as to take full credit for the SNP.[5/15]
And did you know that in October 2015, then SNP Health Secretary Shona Robison appeared before the petitions committee? She refused to back Mrs Kopel's petition. I notice Collette Stevenson forgets all of this context in her 44th out of 50 boasts.[6/15]
Also worth noting is the brilliant efforts of Labour MSP Johann Lamont, she was elected as convener of the petitions committee in June 2016. She would later lodge a motion in parliament highlighting calls for social care charging to end.[7/15]
This was debated in December 2016, with Labour, Conservative and Green MSPs backing the Frank's Law campaign. The SNP, having rejected the petition were long-grassing the whole issue with a 'feasibility study' on expanding free personal care.[8/15]
While the SNP fiddled with its 'feasibility study', Tory MSP Miles Briggs launched a member's bill.
The proposed Free Personal Care (Persons under 65) (Scotland) Bill opened for consultation at the end of June 2017. [9/15]
At the time Briggs won the backing of all opposition parties, & his bill would likely have passed without the SNP. Only now, facing being utterly shamed, did the SNP FINALLY bother to take legislate action, to expand free personal care.[10/15]
So while Collette Stevenson campaign tweet is technically correct, it is deeply misleading. Fact is the SNP & Nicola Sturgeon had to be embarrassed into passing their own version of 'Frank's Law'.[11/15]
Mrs Kopel (the real hero in this story) said: "Yes there were some really rough days - days when I felt like just giving up and thinking I can't go on with this anymore because I kept getting knocked down. But so many people have been beside me."[12/15]
So for the legislation that extended free personal care in Scotland to under-65s; I'm going to thank Mrs Kopel. She's the real hero here. She lobbied all the political parties, she even spoke to Tory conference & pushed her petition in parliament.[13/15]
Mrs Kopel efforts have made thousands of peoples lives better. And an SNP government that had to be embarrassed into passing her law, for fear of opposition parties doing it without them, should show more damn humility in what they claim full credit for in this election.[14/15]
While the #SNP & #Alba fight about defections and #indyref2 strategies...here is the state of poverty in #Scotland after 14 years of nationalist governance
20% of people in Scotland were living in relative poverty after housing costs in 2015-18. gov.scot/publications/p… [2/14]
An estimated 19% of Scotland’s population (1.03 million people/year) living in relative poverty after housing costs in 2017-20. Before housing costs, 17% of the population (910,000 people) were living in poverty. data.gov.scot/poverty/#relat… [3/14]
Doesn’t, on the face of it, seem that Alba is much of a danger to the Scottish Tories, but much more a danger to Scottish Labour in terms of danger of losing list MSPs.
Again however, I don’t fully buy this sort of stats obsessed analysis. For example, imagine Salmond speaks about a diff way (non referendum) to achieve independence, Sturgeon would be forced to respond. Indyref2 is not a voter priority for maj. That hurts SNP in constituencies.
And I repeat: list and constituency don't happen in a vacuum. The political x-factors matter: SNP won't control strategic narrative, Sturgeon (already damaged) is further damaged by 6-week bun fight with Salmond. SNP further seen as a divided party, not focused on voters concerns
A few thoughts on why Salmond's intervention could spell disaster for the SNP, and Nicola Sturgeon in particular. A small thread as I gather my reaction.
[1/10]
First thing to understand by way of context: holding #indyref2 is not at the top of most Scottish voters priorities list at the moment. The polling data is incredibly clear. Survation, Hanbury strategy, Scotland in Union polling (and many others) demonstrate this.[2/10]
Indeed, according to Hanbury Strategy's polling deep dive for think tank Onward found voters concerned the constitutional debate was distracting from other important priorities.[3/10]
Word of the day, 'jejune'. Why is that my word of the day? And how does it relate to the First Minister?
Have a read at my thread and find out...
[1/10]
On February 16th Nicola Sturgeon claimed churches & places of worship were "not closed, but the ability to worship normally and freely is restricted."
(theyworkforyou.com/sp/?id=2021-02…)
[2/10]
But Canon Tom White, the parish priest of St Alphonsus in Glasgow east end alongside other Christian denominations joined together to challenge the FM in a Judicial Review.
Since FMQs had the FM boasting about 'progress' made on closing the attainment gap, I've made a thread on the subject. The goals #ScotGov set itself, and the realities of where we've ended up.
[1/17]
What is the 'attainment gap'?
In Scotland school pupils from most deprived areas do significantly worse at every level of education on average, compared to least deprived areas. This is what is meant by 'the attainment gap'.
You can see why it's an important problem. [2/17]
In a speech to Holyrood in May 25th 2016 the FM said:
"I want our work to close the attainment gap to be the mission, not just of this government or even parliament, but of the country as a whole"
So has she succeeded in closing the attainment gap in education? [3/17]
As we are now entering into the naked politics of the Scottish elections, I'm going to start an (equal opportunities) effort to call out blatant lies by parties. Let's start with @CStevensonSNP. [1/4]
In election material she attempts to take credit for free bus passes. 'Over one million Scots now enjoy free bus travel across the country, including over-60s'.
At best this is deeply misleading, at worst, it's an outright lie. [2/4]
Sarah Boyack is actually the person responsible for free bus passes for the over 60s.
She was Minister for Transport & Planning 2000-2001 in Donald Dewar's first cabinet. She introduced Scottish Labour's flagship policy of free bus travel for people over 60 (& disabled) [3/4]