"If Toyota is selling almost 9 million cars per year.
. . . why does it have a lower Market Cap than Tesla ?"
The QUICK ANSWER is "because they are mature with no growth"
Their results are what they are
Equity Valuations are based on GROWTH
But let's take a closer look at Toyota and understand better with the LONG ANSWER - THREAD :
Equity Valuations are based on GROWTH
Which means we should be looking for more profits in the future than in the present
Standing still has no premium to it
That is good for Bonds
And when your current business is showing this . . .
. . . and you have given investors no clear and credible strategy for getting to the other side . . .
. . . investors naturally HAVE TO discount your prospects
So let's look at the numbers
1. This ICE business is mature
- and facing obvious decline
2. Toyota's Total Revenues are $254.1 billion
And there is no "growth story"
A Valuation at a Price / Sales Ratio of 1.0x would be very generous
= $254.1 billion
3. Toyota's Net Income for 2019 was $19.0 billion
With no growth story
So that's all you can expect to get
$19.0 billion / $254.1 billion = 7.5% Net Income Margin NIM
Compare that with Apple today
- NIM = 20.9%
- and +7.0% Revenue growth
4. Market Capitalization = Equity Value = $243.3 billion
That is a Price / Sales Ratio of 0.96x
- which is almost exactly the 1.0x that was suggested above
$243.3 billion / $19.0 billion Net Income = 12.8x P/E Multiple
That is very fair for a "no growth" company
5. Tesla is currently priced at $617 per share
This represents a 9.4x P/E Multiple on our 2031 Net Income projection after discounting TSLA back to the present and taking into account expected Stock Dilution
So Toyota today is actually being priced higher than TSLA in 2031
6. Which means that the market is not pricing in TSLA's growth after 2031
Whereas in fact we can expect that TSLA's growth rate in 2031 will still be at least +15% per annum
7. Our forecast for 2031 is $6,000 billion
And we have made an extended forecast this week for a Valuation of $10,000 billion in 2036
So TSLA's shares are currently very cheap
And Toyota's shares are very generously priced
- based on the journey that lies ahead of them
FOOTNOTE
"Apple and Samsung could be selling the same amount of smartphones . . . and could perhaps have almost the same revenue . . . but Apple's Valuation is much higher"
Start by looking at Net Income
Not at Sales
Understanding these two charts is KEY
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Credit Suisse and Nomura warn of losses after $20bn stock fire sale
- a major Prime Brokerage Client defaults on their Margin Calls and they dump the shares that it was holding into the market to cover their exposure on.ft.com/3waENaK
Archegos - read as "Arch Egos" - is a family office that manages the wealth of Bill Hwang, a “Tiger cub” alumnus of Julian Robertson’s legendary Tiger Management hedge fund
It had about $10bn of assets last week according to prime brokers
New York-based Hwang previously ran the Tiger Asia hedge fund, but he returned cash to investors in 2012 when he admitted to wire fraud relating to Chinese bank stocks
And let us say that they develop competing self-driving systems
"A" has started earlier and has built up more experience, and eventually reaches a 6-Nines level of safety performance
Let us define 6-Nines here as the condition where the expected safety level is 99.999999% and the risk of a serious adverse event like a death has declined to a chance of 0.000001% or 1 in 10,000,000 miles driven
"Z" has started later but has built up experience at the same rate over time, and when A reaches a 6-Nines level of safety performance Z is able to claim a 4-Nines level of safety performance
Which means that Z's risk of a serious adverse event has declined to 1 in 100,000 miles
Volkswagen Group said it will claim damages from former CEO Martin Winterkorn and former Audi boss Rupert Stadler, as the company tries to draw a line under its diesel cheating scandal europe.autonews.com/automakers/vw-…
The automaker's supervisory board has concluded that Winterkorn breached his duties of care from 27 July 27 2015 . . .
. . . by failing to comprehensively and promptly clarify the circumstances behind the use of unlawful software functions in 2.0-liter TDI diesel engines sold in the North American market between 2009 and 2015, VW said in a statement on Friday