LIN WOOD TELEGRAM UPDATE
You know how I put out periodic reminders that "linked to" and "tied to" are bullshit phrases beloved of conspiracy theorists?
PRIME example right here.
Let's break it down, along with a note on why Lin *absolutely does* know better. 1/5
You know how I put out periodic reminders that "linked to" and "tied to" are bullshit phrases beloved of conspiracy theorists?
PRIME example right here.
Let's break it down, along with a note on why Lin *absolutely does* know better. 1/5
Lin starts by saying that the "election fraud" in Georgia is being revealed more and more these days.
He then pivots to claiming that a personal enemy of his -- a law-school dean who, IIRC, took his name off a building or plaza or something & has incurred his eternal wrath --
He then pivots to claiming that a personal enemy of his -- a law-school dean who, IIRC, took his name off a building or plaza or something & has incurred his eternal wrath --
has "direct ties" to two voting-machine companies.
What ties? DIRECT ONES. WHY DO YOU ASK SUCH IRRITATING QUESTIONS? DIRECT! TIES!
Anyway the REAL question is: on whose *behalf* were she and her boss *acting* when she persecuted Lin Wood so savagely? 🙄
What ties? DIRECT ONES. WHY DO YOU ASK SUCH IRRITATING QUESTIONS? DIRECT! TIES!
Anyway the REAL question is: on whose *behalf* were she and her boss *acting* when she persecuted Lin Wood so savagely? 🙄
What Lin is trying to do here is paint his *personal* enemies as enemies of the Republic and, MUCH more important in his mind, of Trump.
He does this by implying that *the dean of Mercer's Law School* is an important player in a conspiracy to throw the Georgia election to Biden.
He does this by implying that *the dean of Mercer's Law School* is an important player in a conspiracy to throw the Georgia election to Biden.
But Lin knows better than to argue like this, precisely BECAUSE he's a lawyer.
He knows how to prove a claim -- and saying "A has direct ties to B, and B is part of the Devil's Triangle!" ain't it.
A *real* attempt at proof would answer questions like: What ties? So what?
He knows how to prove a claim -- and saying "A has direct ties to B, and B is part of the Devil's Triangle!" ain't it.
A *real* attempt at proof would answer questions like: What ties? So what?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
