We've just concluded three days of fantastic presentations and discussions in the course of the first U.S.-China Futures Summit (@YPFP_USCFP), which was the culmination of the work of series of task forces launched last summer. ypfp.org/u-s-china-futu…
Thanks so much to the @ypfp team, especially @joshuamarcuse! I've appreciated the opportunity to serve on the Steering Committee, along with @Ali_Wyne, @KKoleski, @chenniferann, and @1AlexanderTitus. I've learned so much from my colleagues and fellow participants along the way.
Our task forces tackled topics including geopolitical competition and international institutions, military-civil fusion and defense competition, technology governance, the bioeconomy, next-generation telecommunications, and opportunities to revitalize America going forward.
So follow @YPFP_USCFP, and keep an eye out for ideas, writing, and programming that will be coming up over the next couple of months, and we're excited to share outcomes of our work and this process with you.
U.S.-China Futures is a start-up project and an experiment that has been challenging to implement on several fronts, including in the midst of the pandemic. We've learned a lot and are looking forward to improving the program and continuing the conversation going forward.
And finally, thank you, in particular, to @merrittogle for organizing and helping us convene this initiative and organize the summit! Her contributions have been absolutely invaluable to the success of the program.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At Black Knight, @CyberGent_101 is an Incident Response Analyst. His proudest achievement so far has been leading a cloud security project from a threat hunting, forensics, and defensive standpoint. #ShareTheMicInCyber
In March 2020, @CyberGent_101 had the opportunity to speak at the SANS BlueTeam Summit hosted by @SANSDefense, where he presented a log analysis talk, entitled “Computer Love: Love Letters and Log Analysis.” #ShareTheMicInCyber
This is a good observation on the role of the PLA in China's diplomacy.
This is one of the more nuanced definitions and characterizations on MCF that I've seen in official American assessments that have been publicly released so far.
I am struggling to articulate a coherent response to this direction in American diplomacy, which is at once unsurprising and a continuation of recent trends, yet terribly consequential nonetheless. wsj.com/articles/secre…
First, there are indeed compelling reasons for intense concern about the actions, intentions, and objectives of the Chinese Communist Party, especially considering the trajectory on which the Party has taken China under the leadership of Xi Jinping.
I can recount the issues in play and at stake, but we're all familiar with the core concerns at this point.
I've been so stressed and overwhelmed all week I hadn't noticed my research on military-civil fusion (from an essay in @Strategy_Bridge) was quoted in this piece by @ewong and @julianbarnes yesterday. I wanted to share a few thoughts on this latest policy. nytimes.com/2020/05/28/us/…
By way of disclosure and/or background, I am among those who has argued for some time that the U.S. government should undertake targeted countermeasures in response to the threat of tech transfer that PRC plans and practices have presented for years. cnas.org/publications/c…
By "targeted," I mean precise and careful, responding to an accurate understanding of the near-term threat and long-term challenge, rather than ill-informed or indiscriminate, and ideally avoiding overreach or collateral damage to U.S. values and competitiveness in the process.
I don’t believe the likes of Steve Bannon ought to have any voice or platform in discussions of U.S. policy on China. His ties to the alt right and links to white supremacists are appalling and disgraceful, truly dangerous and un-American. thewirechina.com/2020/05/24/ste…
I can understand why @thewirechina team might choose to interview him, given the extent to which his views and impact in debates on U.S.-China relations have been noteworthy--and deeply damaging, in my opinion. But I was also troubled by how this Q&A was framed and featured.
In particular, I was troubled to see this profile posted without directly addressing his links to the alt right and promotion of intolerance and xenophobia. Instead, he's framed as more or less a 'China expert,' which could convey legitimacy beyond that his views ought to merit.
I haven't managed to keep up with news well today, but I wanted to share a few quick reactions to this “United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” that was recently released as I read through it. whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
As an initial reaction, I am so often struck these days by the juxtaposition of reports or articulations of American strategy that contain a clear logic and relative coherence, relative to the chaos of U.S. politics and policy in the current environment. This is no exception.
There are elements of this report and of U.S. China policy under the current administration that I can agree with up to a point. But personally, I start from the point of view American competitiveness must start at home, with the vitality and strength of our democracy.