At Black Knight, @CyberGent_101 is an Incident Response Analyst. His proudest achievement so far has been leading a cloud security project from a threat hunting, forensics, and defensive standpoint. #ShareTheMicInCyber
In March 2020, @CyberGent_101 had the opportunity to speak at the SANS BlueTeam Summit hosted by @SANSDefense, where he presented a log analysis talk, entitled “Computer Love: Love Letters and Log Analysis.” #ShareTheMicInCyber
.@CyberGent_101 self-published his first eBook “Computer Love: Love Letters & Log Analysis” based on his SANS Blue Team Summit experience, which can be found here: junioryearmedia.com/junior-year-me…
@CyberGent_101 is releasing an eBook, paperback, and audiobook called "They’re ACTing Like THUGs" to inspire change within inner-city environments across America and guide them towards careers in IT & CyberSec. Pre-order the book here: rb.gy/zc1qxx#ShareTheMicInCyber
.@CyberGent_101 initially developed a passion for cyber security as a Sergeant in @FLGuard. He was approached by a Warrant Officer who believed in his skillset enough to give him a chance as a security analyst both in the military and in the corporate sector. #ShareTheMicInCyber
.@CyberGent_101 faced some rejection during his IT and cyber security career. One time, he did not get a role because someone lied on a resume and got the job he'd applied for. This same person later admitted to being overwhelmed, saying "They should have hired you."
@CyberGent_101 is a co-host of the Intrusion Diversity System Podcast, where he and his co-hosts detect and analyze diversity in Cyber Security. Season 3 began in July 2020. Be sure to check it out! #ShareTheMicInCyberintrusionds.com/podcast/
If you want to get in touch with or learn more about the work of @CyberGent_101, here's a link with more information on his projects and where to find him on social media: linktr.ee/dbryant24#ShareTheMicInCyber
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a good observation on the role of the PLA in China's diplomacy.
This is one of the more nuanced definitions and characterizations on MCF that I've seen in official American assessments that have been publicly released so far.
I am struggling to articulate a coherent response to this direction in American diplomacy, which is at once unsurprising and a continuation of recent trends, yet terribly consequential nonetheless. wsj.com/articles/secre…
First, there are indeed compelling reasons for intense concern about the actions, intentions, and objectives of the Chinese Communist Party, especially considering the trajectory on which the Party has taken China under the leadership of Xi Jinping.
I can recount the issues in play and at stake, but we're all familiar with the core concerns at this point.
I've been so stressed and overwhelmed all week I hadn't noticed my research on military-civil fusion (from an essay in @Strategy_Bridge) was quoted in this piece by @ewong and @julianbarnes yesterday. I wanted to share a few thoughts on this latest policy. nytimes.com/2020/05/28/us/…
By way of disclosure and/or background, I am among those who has argued for some time that the U.S. government should undertake targeted countermeasures in response to the threat of tech transfer that PRC plans and practices have presented for years. cnas.org/publications/c…
By "targeted," I mean precise and careful, responding to an accurate understanding of the near-term threat and long-term challenge, rather than ill-informed or indiscriminate, and ideally avoiding overreach or collateral damage to U.S. values and competitiveness in the process.
I don’t believe the likes of Steve Bannon ought to have any voice or platform in discussions of U.S. policy on China. His ties to the alt right and links to white supremacists are appalling and disgraceful, truly dangerous and un-American. thewirechina.com/2020/05/24/ste…
I can understand why @thewirechina team might choose to interview him, given the extent to which his views and impact in debates on U.S.-China relations have been noteworthy--and deeply damaging, in my opinion. But I was also troubled by how this Q&A was framed and featured.
In particular, I was troubled to see this profile posted without directly addressing his links to the alt right and promotion of intolerance and xenophobia. Instead, he's framed as more or less a 'China expert,' which could convey legitimacy beyond that his views ought to merit.
I haven't managed to keep up with news well today, but I wanted to share a few quick reactions to this “United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” that was recently released as I read through it. whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
As an initial reaction, I am so often struck these days by the juxtaposition of reports or articulations of American strategy that contain a clear logic and relative coherence, relative to the chaos of U.S. politics and policy in the current environment. This is no exception.
There are elements of this report and of U.S. China policy under the current administration that I can agree with up to a point. But personally, I start from the point of view American competitiveness must start at home, with the vitality and strength of our democracy.
I’m very excited to share some news. I am writing a book! #FightingtoInnovate should be coming out with @USNIBooks in 2021.
Thank you so much to @kenixfan for reaching out to me about this in the first place! I am thrilled about the opportunity to work with the great @NavalInstitute community.
"Fighting to Innovate: The Future of Chinese Military Power" will build upon research that I have been pursuing since 2015, exploring Chinese military learning and innovation in emerging technologies.