MEGATHREAD: DROPS 34-44 -- PART I: Q SETS THE STAGE FOR THE GREAT DISAPPOINTMENT

This is part I of a megathread on Q drops 34-44; it cpvers drops 34-35, which form a single message, & anons' response.

Parts II & beyond will be MUCH shorter, but these drops are key to Q's myth.
But first: a bit of context.

This takes place in the first Calm Before the Storm thread, which itself is a continuation of an earlier thread (linked) that called Q “Info Dump Anon” and “LARPer Guy” (but, y’know, in a friendly way).

archive.4plebs.org/pol/post/14750…
Given the way Q was referred to in that last thread, you can see *why* they’d make sure that their debut in THIS one featured much, much stronger branding.

Hence the first words of their first post: “Q Clearance Patriot.”
BTW, if you’re wondering what happened in the thread before Q came along, the answer is: not much of note.

A link is below, but mostly it was lots of shrieking about Benghazi and Hillary (a "callous hag deserving of a rope around her scaly neck").

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147…
I have never been as mad at anything as these anons were about Benghazi; several of them LARPed about it so hard I thought my eyes were going to roll out of my skull.

But that's wildly off-topic; we should return to drops 34 and 35.

I've seen 34 called "the drop of drops." Why?
Because drop 34: 1) sets a deadline for the Storm (the first of many, MANY missed deadlines);

2) is explicit about what the Storm will be (arrests of Trump's enemies/the Cabal while martial law is declared); and

3) establishes several parts of Q lore that persist to this day.
But how do we know that it's part of the same message as drop 35?

Partly because of the timestamps -- they're posted roughly 20 seconds apart.

Clearly, these were pre-composed and copy-pasted into 4chan ahead of time; Q often did this with their first few posts in a thread.
Partly, too, because of the prose -- drop 34 starts with "My Fellow Americans" and 35 ends with "my fellow Americans."

And they tell the same basic story: they form an address from Q to the anons, explaining what the anons can expect to see "over the course of the coming days."
There are a LOT of weird little bits of drops 34 and 35 to focus in on. A LOT.

Take the Bible quote, for example. It's two famous verses stitched together, and @SethDaire did some WONDERFUL digging to find out where it may have come from:

In short, Seth found that BibleGateway -- the single most popular site for the text of the Bible -- had a page which, itself, listed the most-quoted *verses* in the Bible.

And wouldn't you know it? Drop 35 mashes together two passages mentioned on that page. Interesting!
And what's more interesting is: the passages in question aren't--you wouldn't find them put side by side in any other context. It doesn't make *sense* theologically. They're not about the same kind of love. And, indeed, you DON'T find them jammed together pretty much anywhere...
except in this Q drop.

It's almost as if Q has almost no knowledge of how conservative Christians talk, but wants to take a stab at it.

What do we make of this? I don't know. But it's interesting.
And what about drop 34? First, let's look at the short timeline Q sets for the Storm: a couple-three days from this post.

To be sure, there's a TINY bit of wiggle room. Q says that "Podesta" (without specifying which Podesta brother) will be arrested "11.3 (actionable 11.4)."
First of all: I have a LOT of questions about why one would make an "arrest announcement" on a particular day, but make it only "actionable" the next day, while ALSO being concerned with preventing the TARGETS of these arrests from fleeing the country.

But I have an answer, too:
The November 4th "Antifa Apocalypse" is -- as always -- *key* to understanding Q's origin story.

I cannot readily explain how terrified anons were of the CERTAINLY-REAL-FOR-SURE Antifa uprising that was "scheduled" for the 4th. But I can tell you this:
To this day, one chan-CHUD who keeps popping up in my mentions (and will probably either reply to this or @ me shortly) *insists* that the Antifa Apocalypse WAS real and WAS going to be bad & that he helped avert it by warning the anons about it.

Apparently he traveled to do so.
Of course, it was a nothingburger; the far-right elements of the Internet were pissing their pants in fear over a little tiny cult of personality led by an old man who goes by "Chairman Bob."

But the anons didn't know that yet (and, like I said, many still don't).
So Q was *in a bind* when that didn't happen. You might call it the Great Disappointment, but it also gave birth to the Great Pivot -- if Q was going to stick around on 4chan, they needed SOMETHING to latch on to to say "No, see, it really DID happen!"

But that's for the future.
What matters NOW is that setting a deadline that was only a couple days in the future is a *pattern* for Q. Q has done it before (that's what drop 1 did, right?); Q does it again here; but you have to ask yourself: WHY?

Did Q really expect the Storm? How was it going to END?
And here, too, I don't have a firm answer for you. I honestly think, though, that Q didn't expect this to be a long-term LARP: I think Q was originally like "Ah, I'm gonna noodle around with this shit for a few days and just see how it goes."
And, uh... it went PRETTY WELL for Q. And pretty badly for the rest of us.

So that was fun! 🙃

Anyway, HOME STRETCH NOW: responses to drops 34 and 35 fall into a few broad categories: ironic, skeptical/hostile, curious, believers.

Not gonna bother discussing the ironic ones.
Skeptical/hostile responses focused in on inconsistencies in Q's story: "If you're the LARPer, why do you have DOE clearance?" "EMS? Clarify that you're not a... LARPer and that you're actually talking about EAS. This is important."

And then there's the simple post below:
Curious anons probe part of Q's story (one such anon notes a plot hole, then talks themselves into believing that in FACT Q means that *even the riots themselves* are a part of the patriots' master plan -- it's pretty easy to con folks when they talk themselves into it, right?).
But the believers... hoo boy.

I can't prove that any of these are regular anons. They could CONCEIVABLY be Q's sockpuppets. But feast your eyes on them -- especially the first one:
P.S. Remember Q's sign-off "4,10,20?" Remember how Q's supposed to be a superspy or, in some tellings, descended from the fiendishly difficult puzzles of Cicada 3301?

Here, an anon asks what 4,10,20 means, and Q explains 3 minutes later: a=1, b=2, c=3, etc.🙄SUCH cryptography!!
P.P.S. Remember how I mentioned the skeptical anons? One of Q's greatest strengths is that they *just. don't. engage. with. skeptics.* Ever. They refuse to get down in the mud, and that's CRUCIAL to building and maintaining their myth.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Q Origins Project

The Q Origins Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @QOrigins

2 Apr
SMALL UPDATE FROM Q TELEGRAM:

Everything about this post -- that it was made on Gab by a QAnon promoter who uses Honest Abe as his avatar -- makes my head a'splode.
But it ALSO is an excuse to remind you: QAnon is a reality inversion field. It always has been and it always will be.
P.S. Lest you think he is somehow sincere, here he is soon afterwards describing vaccine passports:
Read 4 tweets
30 Mar
LIN WOOD TELEGRAM UPDATE

You know how I put out periodic reminders that "linked to" and "tied to" are bullshit phrases beloved of conspiracy theorists?

PRIME example right here.

Let's break it down, along with a note on why Lin *absolutely does* know better. 1/5
Lin starts by saying that the "election fraud" in Georgia is being revealed more and more these days.

He then pivots to claiming that a personal enemy of his -- a law-school dean who, IIRC, took his name off a building or plaza or something & has incurred his eternal wrath --
has "direct ties" to two voting-machine companies.

What ties? DIRECT ONES. WHY DO YOU ASK SUCH IRRITATING QUESTIONS? DIRECT! TIES!

Anyway the REAL question is: on whose *behalf* were she and her boss *acting* when she persecuted Lin Wood so savagely? 🙄
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar
My final-for-NOW thought on the Bannon stuff:

The gold standard for assessing whether Ron's claims about Bannon hold water would be to take the unedited, unblurred footage of Ron's evidence and sit down with an independent technical expert to review.

This, we can't yet do. BUT:
We can weigh up the other evidence we have so far (e.g. Ron was neck-deep in the 1/5/18 coup; Ron allegedly sent a hail-Mary plea to Bannon for a lawyer and one materialized -- but also Jim Watkins is wealthy and could afford a lawyer, it doesn't have to be a conspiracy) & go:
OK, which of these fragments of evidence point to X, and which point to Y, and how confident am I of both their authenticity and the strength of my conclusions?

This is the way! You'll almost never have perfectly sourced info but you can start working on the stuff you DO have.
Read 4 tweets
29 Mar
Early reactions to episodes 3 and 4 of the HBO doc from QAnon Telegram: almost universally negative.

One lady who was filmed for the doc wanted to sue (good luck), but most were just bored or mad that QAnon didn't come off looking so hot.

More reactions in the next few tweets. ImageImageImageImage
I love the lady who's like "DOES RON EVER CHANGE CLOTHES?" ImageImageImageImage
Two notable things here: 1. The 4th image is like "hey now, Ron is CodemonkeyZ! Trump retweeted him!"

2. Another anon is like "but why are you showing the BAD QAnon followers? Why not Praying Medic?" Not sure Praying Medic would come off much better, but 🤷‍♂️ ImageImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
28 Mar
IT'S GRAPH O'CLOCK, CHILDREN!

Gather 'round for a graph of the "normieficiation" of QAnon (what a GREAT phrase, btw!).

By "normiefication," the authors mean: the spread of QAnon from a small, 4chan-savvy audience to the wider Internet.

Next: analysis!
firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/…
As you can see on the FULL graph (click in to expand, naturally), there was a tiny bit of Q-related content leaking onto the wider Internet almost from the start.

Reddit content was at first largely confined to r/conspiracy, and there were a few YouTubers covering Q early on.
So at the VERY beginning -- the period I'm mostly concerned with -- Q was largely a 4chan phenomenon. The data makes it *look* like YouTube, rather than Reddit, was the key driver of QAnon reaching a wider audience.

This is possible, but we don't have info on *views.*
Read 5 tweets
28 Mar
Somehow I had already forgotten that, IN MID-FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR,

the VERY conservative American Enterprise Institute found 29% of white evangelicals said it was "completely" or "mostly" accurate that Trump was fighting a cabal of pedophile Dems. 🙃🙃

religionnews.com/2021/02/11/sur…
The article is worth a read, BTW, because it has really interesting breakdowns on prevalence of QAnon belief by race and religion.
Oh! I should add -- this survey may actually UNDER-report the prevalence of that belief, since at least one other reputable survey found approximately 50% of Republicans believing that top Democrats are involved in child-sex-trafficking rings.

So: 🙃🙃🙃
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!