As long as the US keeps playing this game of holding ☮️ (the end of the Korean War) hostage to DPRK’s “full denuclearization”, DPRK’s nuclear deterrence & 2nd strike capability will keep growing. I’d immediately negotiate accepting a limited nuclear DPRK, normalization & ☮️. 🤩
2/Nuclear DPRK, Ltd
There’s direct proportionality b/t US’s hostility (unilateral demands, conditions, sanctions) towards DPRK and the pace of DPRK’s nuclear & ICBM development. When the former increases, so does the latter. Were the former to stop, so would the latter. The
3/geniuses (not) in the Beltway don’t seem to grasp this elementary relation tho. Instead of worrying Kim will break his self-imposed double moratorium, they should entice DPRK to agreeing to Maximum Limits on their nuclear & ICBM programs (maximum allowable nukes & ICBSs).
4/The DPRK doesn’t want to keep its nuclear program rolling down the track - It has no choice! If the US said: “Let’s talk maximum numbers on your nukes & missiles DPRK”
@SecBlinken
@POTUS
@TheBlueHouseENG
PY has the chance to put the brakes on their programs. The last thing
5/DPRK wants is war. But they won’t back down from defending against what they perceive are threats. (US threats. “Perception is 9/10 of reality” applies here.) Offering an off ramp is the best play. Talking numbers implies the US is willing to accept DPRK as a nuclear state, and
6/the devil will be in the details. This isn’t a concession that implies accepting a nuclear DPRK makes the world “more dangerous” (as some think), but rather gives the advantage to the US. I realize that the US/ROK/UN et al don’t understand how much DPRK wants ☮️ & normalized
7/relations w/ the US. Those two items (plus acceptance as a nuclear state) comprise the holy grail of DPRK’s national objectives. Just ask them. So if the US dangles the proposition of these 3 objectives being fulfilled in exchange for DPRK agreeing to a list of conditions,
8/they’ll readily sit w/ the US to talk and bargain things to a mutually acceptable “price”.

DPRK agrees:
* To shut down all nuclear enrichment facilities
* To maximum numbers of X nuclear warheads, Y1/Y2 ICBMs/SLBMs & Z nuclear subs
* To the rules of non-proliferation
* To USFK
9/remaining in perpetuity in S Korea strictly for regional defense under Mutual Defense Treaty
* To sign non-aggression pacts w/ US, ROK & allies/territories

US agrees to:
* Diplomatically recognize DPRK as a limited nuclear state for as long as DPRK abides by all conditions
10/* Permanently end USFK joint military exercises targeting DPRK
* Sign a Declaration Of Intent to formally end the Korean War
* Phase out UNSC Resolution sanctions targeting DPRK in a gradual, timely & orchestrated manner
* Set up liaison offices in Washington & Pyongyang for
11/the purpose of establishing formal diplomats relations

I think I covered the bases. I hope you can see that living w/ a limited nuclear DPRK in this manner not only fulfills all of their national objectives but meets ours as well in a balance of learning to “Live & let live”.
12/post-thread

Link 3:

*ICBMs*, not *ICBSs*

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael L Bonic

Michael L Bonic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BonicMichael

3 Apr
Let’s Share The Korean Peninsula
(What a brilliant idea, why didn’t I think of it? Oh wait, I did.)
[A Theatrical Parody]

A diplomat stands up to address the other diplomats seated at a table:
2/DPRK Diplomat: “OK we fought a bloody war to decide who gets control the Korean Peninsula. It was too brutal so we signed an Armistice. And now you you want us to decide who rules over a reunited Korea in this room?!”

ROK Diplomat: “Pretty much. It’s better than fighting.”
3/DPRK Diplomat: “We’ll never give up our Socialism. How can we resolve in this room what couldn’t be settled on the battlefield?”

US Diplomat: “Just give us all of your nukes DPRK, and all of the splendors of Western capitalism will be yours to enjoy.”

DPRK Diplomat: “Ha! You
Read 13 tweets
3 Apr
Historical backdrop to the “Korea Question” still unanswered today
[From MAY 26, 2009]
Are We at War With North Korea?
Um, sort of, in a way …
slate.com/news-and-polit…
“Sort of. The 1953 Korean War Armistice Agreement, signed by the United Nations Command, North Korea, and China,
2/“ended the conflict in a practical sense. It set up a system for exchanging prisoners of war, created a north-south boundary within a demilitarized zone, and marked the suspension of all open hostilities. It was not, however, intended as the final say on the matter. In fact,
3/“Article IV of the Armistice recommends that “the governments concerned on both sides” convene a conference within three months of signing to organize the withdrawal of foreign forces from the peninsula and settle the “Korea question”—roughly, who would rule over a reunited
Read 10 tweets
2 Apr
@duyeonkim @BulletinAtomic The US's nuclear triad is more dangerous and they know it. It is beyond ludicrous, it's delusional to think DPRK is planning to attack South Korea. They have a No First Use Policy and their nukes are only for defense if say the US attacked them. Besides
@duyeonkim @BulletinAtomic 2/attacking ROK/US/allies/territories would be suicide and DPRK definitely want's to survive - and thrive in socialist economic prosperity.

Why DPRK Has Nukes (A Primer)

You KNOW why DPRK has nukes right? The US, by its policy, can do a nuclear first
@duyeonkim @BulletinAtomic 3/strike on North Korea in the name of “self-defense”. Read John Bolton’s piece. DPRK has read it. So DPRK is deterring the US from attacking/regime change/nuclear first strike thru textbook deterrence theory. They just did self-defense exercises which every sovereign nation has
Read 16 tweets
1 Apr
“In China, the people can’t change the government, but the system keeps changing. In countries like the US, the people can change the government, but the system can’t be changed.” quora.com/How-safe-is-Ch…
2/“Finally, came Deng Xiao Ping who famously said:“It doesn’t matter black cat (Capitalism) or white cat (Communism), as long as it catches mice, it’s a good cat”. His preference in pragmatism than ideologies has transformed China. This thinking allowed China to make plans which
3/“suit the actual needs in the country, instead of rigidly bounded to ideologies. By embracing market economy, it signified China had stopped pursuing the goal of a communism state...

In just 40 years, the CPC have lifted 800 million people out from poverty. The rate of growth
Read 8 tweets
1 Apr
Biden’s NK Policy Review, likely a step-by-step/phased approach of denuclearization rewarding DPRK at each step w/ sanctions relief, clashes w/: "[W]e shall never barter our system, the safety & future of our people for the likes of lifting of sanctions”.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1377308…
2/Additional threads:

Kim Yo Jong calls out the hypocrisy of the double standard in self-defense exercises in Moon Jae In’s rhetoric in a statement of scathing critique.
Read 8 tweets
31 Mar
The Biden Admin’s North Korea Policy Review will likely take a step-by-step/phased approach towards North Korea’s “complete denuclearization”, rewarding DPRK at each step w/ incremental sanctions relief.
2/However Kim Yo Jong has previously said (her 10 July 2020 remarks appear later in thread) that DPRK will reject any future “denuclearization for sanctions” schemes offered by the US. Biden’s NK Policy Review following Friday’s US-Japan-ROK Trilat NSA Dialogue then could be DOA.
3/Cue to 4:42:

Anchor: “The trilateral meeting this time this Friday may mean that we will soon see the conclusion of the Biden Administration’s North Korea Policy. What are you expecting.”

Dr Go: “So...From the reports coming out of Washington, it looks like the Biden
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!