On Easter, let's remember that according to early sources, Pilate was a consistent & total ass.
During his 10 year stint as Judean governor, he was involved in brutally subduing Jews, popular movements & their charismatic figures..including Jesus.
Everyone hated Pilate.
🧵 1/12
Pilate arrived at his new post around 26 CE. One of the first things he did was to erect effigies of Caesar in Jerusalem.
This incensed the Jewish population, which begged him to remove them.
This incident was not the first nor the last time someone erected a statue in Jerusalem, such as Herod's golden eagle and Caligula's threat to erect an effigy of himself.
Erecting effigies or statues in Jerusalem, and especially in or around the temple, was terrible sacrilege.
You'd think when the local population tells you this is sacrilege, you might reconsider your action. What did Pilate do?
"He gave a signal to the soldiers to encompass them & threatened that their punishment would be sudden death unless they stopped disturbing him & went home."
Next, Pilate wanted to build an aqueduct in Jerusalem. Nice! Where did he get the money from? The temple!
Recall, this was the great offense of Heliodorus (2 Mac. 3), & guaranteed to piss Jews off. When thousands protested, Pilate sent disguised soldiers who stabbed & killed.
What's the next story in Josephus? The story of Jesus's death!
This is a complicated passage, which has undergone editing overtime.
Regardless of what is original, its placement shows how seamlessly Jesus' death fits within Pilate's career.
So, when a charismatic Samaritan figure led a throng of people up to the temple at Mount Gerizzim, Pilate resorted to his favorite tactic: he had his soldiers attack the people without warning, again killing many.
Following this, the Samaritans appeal to the legate of Syria, accusing Pilate of wanton violence, explaining "they did not go..to revolt against the Romans, but to escape the violence of Pilate."
Pilate is removed & sent to Rome for judgment.
This is the last we hear of him.
When scholars point to the fact that Pilate's responsibility for Jesus' death is diminished in later gospels and sources, this isn't apologetics; no one around the time of Pilate's life would excuse him of anything!
His MO was to subdue charismatic figures & popular movements.
This is necessary background to understand the literary effect of making Jews clamor for Jesus' death, while Pilate remains hesitant: it is intentionally subverting the expectations of the audience!
If Pilate, of all people, did not want to kill him, look how bad the Jews are!
In time, Pilate is not only exonerated of responsibility for Jesus' death, he is a central figure in some early Christian texts, in which he himself converts, is crucified, & becomes a saint!
While I have here derided Pilate, he was overzealous and particularly brutal, but not categorically different from some other Judean procurators and officials of the first century CE, & esp. their reactions to the rise of various dissident groups. A thread for another time.
Fin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
TIL about Rotwelsch, the "language of swindlers" used in German speaking portions of Europe from the middle ages on.
It was used by hucksters, tricksters, & bandits, many of whom were... Jews!
How do we know? Because over 20% of the sociolect is made of Hebraisms!
1/4
The first major attestation of Rotwelsch is in the 1509 Liber Vagatorum, which included a preface by Martin Luther & was widely disseminated thanks to the printing press.
It describes the practices of swindlers & thieves, & includes a section on the vocabulary of Rotwelsch.
Luther says: "such Beggars’ Cant has come from the Jews, for many Hebrew words occur in the Vocabulary.."
Luther's well-known virulent anti-Judaism is expressed here in attributing the origins of Rotwelsch to Jews.
But the vocabulary shows Jews were undoubtedly participants.
Why do participants at the Passover Seder dip & remove 16 drops of wine when mentioning the plagues in Egypt?
The earliest explanations (c. 13th c.) make clear this is a kind of sympathetic magic: "[This custom] teaches us that we will not be injured [by the plagues]."
🧵
1/4
The caption under the woodcut in Prague Haggadah 1526, depicted above, says this quite clearly:
“It seems to me that it is a hint [that] ‘All of the illness which I put on Egypt, I will not put on you’ (Exodus 15:26).” In other words, “as if to say, they should not harm us”.
Others would reinterpret the custom to refer both to Jews being saved from plagues, & also as a call to bring the plagues upon their enemies.
Shalom of Neustadt (d. c. 1413): "we should be saved from these plagues & may they come upon the heads [of the nations of the world]."
Though typically dated to 74 CE & the fall of Masada, Josephus says that rebels survived & fled across the Jewish world, including to regions that would soon become centers of unrest.
Large movements rarely end so swiftly.
1/4
Josephus says:
"For the many Sicarii who were able to flee..were not content to have saved themselves, but undertook to make new disturbances, & persuaded many.. to assert their liberty, to [not esteem] the Romans, & to look upon God as their only Lord and Master."
This all happened "...when Masada was taken..." and as a result "this war afforded disturbances and dangerous disorders even in places very far remote from Judea. For still it came to pass, that many Jews were slain at Alexandria, in Egypt..."
Ever wonder why the introduction of the Passover Haggadah is in Aramaic & seems unattached to the rest of the text, & what Elijah is doing at the seder?
As I argue in a recent article, the two answers are connected!
The P Haggadah is almost entirely in Hebrew, and primarily consists of citations of scripture, rabbinic literature, liturgy, & poetry. Yet it begins with an Aramaic intro with no clear basis in any preceding Jewish text, confusing practitioners & scholars for centuries. It reads:
This is the bread of affliction that our parents ate in the land of Egypt. Whoever is hungry, let him come & eat; whoever is in need, let him come & perform the Passover. This year we are here, next year.. in the land of Israel. This year we are slaves, next year we will be free.
Regarding the "Shapira Scrolls," I read two fascinating articles from @TheJQR which include a discussion with Shapira's dealer Salim about the marketplace $ production of forgeries in late 19th century Palestine, & some damning details concerning the Shapira Scrolls...
🧵 1/20
The first piece is by Abraham Shalom Yahuda (1877-1951), born in Jerusalem, a bibliophile, linguist, polymath & antiquities collector with contacts in the antiquities market in Palestine. He would end his career at the New School in NYC.
In 1944, he wrote an article about his visit to Palestine in 1902, and his encounter with the "dragoman" Salim.
Yahuda quickly realized that this was none other than the "self-same Salim" responsible for the infamous forged Moabite antiquities sold in 1872 by M. W. Shapira.
The Arch of Titus is one of the most well-known ancient monuments concerning Jewish history.
Built in 82 CE, it depicts the victorious procession of Roman troops carrying Jewish temple vessels, including of course the golden Menorah.
But there was once another arch.
🧵
1/9
The Arch was part of a broader visual & ideological program intended to legitimate & bolster the new Flavian dynasty. The defeat of the Jews was therefore inflated, depicted not as a relatively easily won war over a revolting province, but the conquest of a foreign territory.
2
We see the development of this program in the coins minted to commemorate the victory. The legend on the more common coins reads "Judea Capta," Judea is conquered, which often depicted a woman, probably the personified Judea, mourning.