take a minute and imagine a tree in a park or garden. Make it a really nice tree that has been well situated in its environment. Think about the trees’ imperfect symmetry, they way it occupies its space
Now think about this: someone planted the tree; others tended to it and trimmed it; more people spent generations selecting this domesticated tree from its ancestral stock. It is a inextricable product of nature and nurture. #HomerTrees
Then there’s the aesthetics of the tree. Your appreciation is based on other trees you might not remember as well as an entire ‘grammar’ of human beings and the environment
Now, if someone asks you who is responsible for the tree, what do you say? Is it someone who designed the park? Is it a gardener? Is it the first person who imagined a tree in the garden?
Any single answer ignores hundreds of people and things that contributed to the treeness of this tree. It also ignores the salient fact that you are the one judging the tree and that your judgment is shaped by non-tree things.
For me, the Homeric epics are like that tree. They come out of a complex relationship between performance traditions, new technologies, and aesthetics that are both products and producers of the same song culture. And ours
We always simplify our interpretation of where the tree came from because our minds are too small to understand we are part of mind-networks and our lives are two abbreviated to feel time’s larger sweep
We impose simple origin stories on art and human products because it is hard to escape our own single experience of culture and see how it works in the aggregate
(also, we have been trained to see the world in terms of self over collective)
We impose a god/author model on complex things for cultural and psychological reasons. It is a fallacy to insist that design implies a designer when we are recognizing design as viewers because we are conditioned to do so.
There's no smoking gun about Homeric authorship. there will never be a clear answer to the issue. THAT we care so much about it is a problem. it is, dare I say, the rot at the core of 'western' liberalism and capitalism, this desperate search for ancient authority
Most people find in searching for "Homer" what they want to find. That's my experience of teaching, reading, and writing about the epics for over two decades. That's also why I keep returning to the bench and thinking as much about who is thinking about Homer and why
And when I turn back I think less in terms of "who wrote the Iliad" and what the people were like who domesticated the epics and set them aside and why we still look at them today.
.@kataplexis and @lpoldybloom train our gaze to a small liberal arts school where they teach, to move the discourse from elite institutions and PhD programs
This is a different call from early weeks' claims that classics is qualitatively different outside the US and that recent years' problems are primarily (*anglo)-American
When you were young you bought your dream house. It was an old, sprawling victorian. It needed work, but you loved the neighborhood and really thought you could restore it
Every summer, every break, on weeknights and weekends: you sanded, painted, watched videos about tiling, tried to find original molding for the trim. You made your life into fixing that house
You replaced the roof, updated the windows, tried to keep the original wood siding. The house was an endless pit of resources but you always loved it. You raised your children there. The house became part of who you were
This report's reductive, revisionist, and racist idolatry is exactly why I come down so hard on approaches to the humanities that use similar strategies even if they adjust the content and make it "centrist" or "apolitical"
Hoo, boy! This cacata carta makes all sorts of squishy claims about founding fathers feeling bad about slavery, equates progressivism with relativism (on a walk towards fascism and communism) and claims that the only
"authentic education" includes "moral education" (41)
Friends, I have been following the janko discussion and as a homerist with some interest in traditional and formulaic language, I just wanted to add my two cents. Sorry to butt in! But...you know...
I have not taken Janko’s methods or his results seriously for decades because (1) it is based on deeply problematic premises and (2) the dataset will never be sufficient
For (1) his method and model assumes (a) a static and (b) hierarchical relationship between texts that (c) does not entertain multiple performance traditions development different levels of fixity over time
Agamemnon, in a press conference today, declared the start of a 1266 BCE Commission to combat the #fakenews Helen and Clytenmestra apologists and the #AntiArgive lies of the Iliad which shows the Trojans as human beings
IN particular, the Peloponnesian death lord was eager to combat anti-Greek and pro-women propaganda, claiming that Helen wasn't all to blame or that people shouldn't sacrifice their daughters.
Agamemnon continued by telling the assembled ghosts that liberal Marxists like Homer and Euripides had been corrupting the youth for too long and that they needed real patriotic education to rid their fatherlands of their epidemics of sympathy, pity, and human understanding
Homer provides few universal rights for human beings, but one that emerges in the Iliad is the expectation of proper burial, lamentation, and memorial.
The γέρας…θανόντων (Geras thanontôn).
Literally, something like the "honor prize of the dead"
γέρας (geras) is charged in the Iliad. The whole conflict between Agamemnon and Achilles starts when Agamemnon deprives Achilles of Briseis, his γέρας (geras), which is a token of the honor (timê) he has in his community.