When you challenge authority or large firms, you expect a backlash, retaliation or heightened 'scrutiny' (Accepted as evidence of 'harassment/backlash' by studies). Step up @kent_police . I'm not sure how they escape the position they're now in. @TransparencyTF @AWhistleblowing
The evidence I now have proves one of two things: a) Corruption or dishonesty, either unilateral or as a result of other third party influence, or b) Targeted attack on me motivated by Kent Police agenda as a result of my complaint against them......
In 2020 Kent Police ignored & buried significant and substantial evidence of crimes committed against me by London law firm & a large UK Accountancy/Insolvency firm partner. One of the parties implicated by my evidence just happens to be a Special Constable for the @NCA_UK .....
Whereas on February 21st I was called by Kent Police officer who threatened me, tried to intimidate me and made a variety of threats with no grounds, evidence or justification to do so. I launched complaint that night and was assured a call back within 10 days by investigator...
I received no call. Repeated calls by me to follow up this complaint and the complaint regarding the burying of evidence I presented them, met with no response other than being told the public can no longer be put through to police officers, they must wait for a call back....
The two complaints are very much interconnected, but despite having received no call to discuss my complaint made on Feb 21st, my evidence and its relevance to my complaint made last year, I get a letter from Chief Inspector Dann, trying to close it........
Not going to happen. They have a serious case to answer, and whilst I appreciate that they are in enormous trouble here, making false representations and perverting their own complaints process is neither the answer nor is it lawful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
