Two things can be true at the same time:

1 - vested interests try & frame climate change as a question of individual responsibility *only*

2 - we should still be interested & do something about the very large inequalities in personal carbon footprints
Ignoring 2 just because of 1 would be a very bad idea.
In our 'discourses of climate delay' paper we identified "individualism" as one of the 12 discourses BUT something you may not know is that we considered including *systemism* ("all we need is system change, forget about individuals") as well.
The reason why we did not include it is (if I remember correctly) just that we thought it wasn't as widespread as "individualism".

"Climate mitigation requires a global revolution, in the meantime I'll keep flying to Mallorca every 2 weeks" is not a morally tenable position IMO

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Giulio Mattioli

Giulio Mattioli Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @giulio_mattioli

7 Apr
Is this "fully automated luxury whataboutism"?

A thread on misconceptions around flying and its climate impact
Playing down the significance of an emission sector because it's just 2 or 3% is *never* a good idea - see paper & thread here
It is *particularly inappropriate* to use that argument for air travel, for many reasons.

1. Air travel is incredibly *carbon intensive*. Perhaps the most carbon intensive way in which to use your time. If you fly, it probably accounts for a very large share of your emissions
Read 16 tweets
27 Mar
US Transport Secretary #Buttigieg suggested a vehicle miles tax. And so the usual debate goes on between:

A: "are you mad taxing car use is *obviously* regressive"

B: " No it isn't"

So I am reupping a few threads that I wrote about this question
A few caveats. My threads refer to the European situation. The US is more car-dependent which means that more low-income households drive cars, and over longer distances (but fuel prices are lower).

Overall, this exacerbates concerns about the social impact of taxing car use.
Read 6 tweets
3 Mar
The UK is doing is very well with the vaccines, but is it going to people's heads?

This poll would suggest it is. British respondents rate the UK's performance better than Israel(!) and much better than the US, although the data does not bear that out. kekstcnc.com/insights/covid…
The actual data on the vaccination rate
These matrices are a *treasure trove* for laying bare national stereotypes.

So which countries do Germans think are doing *worst* with vaccines? Well, why, UAE & Italy.

*All* countries surveyed also likely to think that UAE is doing badly. Except this is the reality. 🤯😂🤦‍♂️
Read 8 tweets
28 Feb
Interesting data from an international opinion poll: 11% see car owning *primarily* as a financial constraint / something that is hard to afford
consorsfinanz.de/unternehmen/st… Image
The share of people who see cars primarily as a financial constraint is strikingly similar across countries at around 10% Image
In most countries there is a substantial share of car owners who sometimes give up on using their cars because of the cost of fuel. Particularly among younger adults. Image
Read 4 tweets
13 Nov 20
You want to get a sense of how difficult transport is for climate mitigation? Go no further than this report.

A THREAD with lots of graphs
Transport is by far the largest sector of final energy consumption in the EU.

20 years ago, industry & residential were close, but both have declined, while transport has increased.
While final energy consumption increased, energy *efficiency* decreased steadily.

So what happened there? Well, travel *activity* increased (with ups & downs due to the economic crisis)
Read 18 tweets
11 Nov 20
This is fun but how could they miss the dreaded *production stage*!? 😱😂
"All your 300+ references get misplaced after you approved the (correct) proofs, so the paper is online but everything is wrong with it. Hope no one sees it & spend a few days correcting references & emailing the journal manager" (TRUE STORY)
"Your special issue article erroneously gets published in a regular issue. Spend your holidays on the phone with the publisher. End up with the same paper published twice, once as "Reprint", with 2 separate DOIs"
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!