Transport is by far the largest sector of final energy consumption in the EU.
20 years ago, industry & residential were close, but both have declined, while transport has increased.
While final energy consumption increased, energy *efficiency* decreased steadily.
So what happened there? Well, travel *activity* increased (with ups & downs due to the economic crisis)
In *relative* terms the largest increases in transport energy consumption are in the new member states.
Look at Poland, where it increased by *130%* in 20 years!
And look at Italy, where it decreased.
In absolute terms, the increase in transport energy consumption in Eastern Europe is not that large, because of small population numbers & still relatively low motorisation (but again, look at Poland!)
[As an aside: my sense from the figures I see is that Poland is a hugely interesting case studies for how a country can rush into car dependence. I haven't seen much research on that though]
"BUT - I hear you saying - this is *energy*, not carbon emissions. And ofc the transport sector is being rapidly electrified".
Well, hold your horses & look at the graph. Can you see the increase in electricity use? Me neither.
I can see a huge increase in Diesel though...
In fact, electricity accounted for 1.7% of the final energy mix 20 years ago and... 1.4% today 😮
Of course, when we're talking about transport energy consumption, we're mostly talking about road transport and (to much smaller extent) aviation.
Energy consumption has increased in both sectors over the last 20 years.
The share of electricity as a fuel type in road transport was... 0.1% in 2018. Long way to go.
There's been an increase in "biofuels and (other) renewables" though
One of the things that's happened in the EU over the last 20 years is that the *number of vehicles* (both cars & trucks) has increased a lot.
Ironically, in the transport research community we spent much of this period debating about 'peak car'...
The carbon efficiency of passenger cars got better over time but:
- that has stopped/reversed since the SUV boom
- more cars & increasing travel activity have more than offset that
Passenger transport volume was up 17.3% between 2000 to 2017, mostly due to cars & aviation.
So what we have in the transport sector in the EU is an old story: increasing car ownership & use negating improvements in energy / carbon efficiency.
This is the big picture. All those things we spend much time talking about (peak car, EVs, etc.) exist...*at the margins* (END)
NB: this is not a criticism of those doing research on e.g. peak car & EVs (of which I'm an avid consumer).
I'm just arguing for more 'balance in the force', and more attention to negative trends - such as the car-dependent evolution of countries like Poland.
So what we have in the transport sector in the EU is an old story: increasing car ownership & use negating improvements in energy / carbon efficiency.
This is the big picture. All those things we spend much time talking about (peak car, EVs, etc.) exist...*at the margins* (END)
NB: this is not a criticism of those doing research on e.g. peak car & EVs (of which I'm an avid consumer).
I'm just arguing for more 'balance in the force', and more attention to negative trends - such as the car-dependent evolution of countries like Poland.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"All your 300+ references get misplaced after you approved the (correct) proofs, so the paper is online but everything is wrong with it. Hope no one sees it & spend a few days correcting references & emailing the journal manager" (TRUE STORY)
"Your special issue article erroneously gets published in a regular issue. Spend your holidays on the phone with the publisher. End up with the same paper published twice, once as "Reprint", with 2 separate DOIs"
It is of course *entirely possible* that the enamourment with eFuels is not authentic, but more a means to an end (= avoiding any move away from the internal combustion engine).
That would make this a "discourse of climate delay" (see paper & thread ⬇️
As you might have noticed, I'm not the biggest fan of the automotive industry. But this article on the links between German carmakers and the Orban regime shocked even me. 😱 Must-read.
This is one of those collaborations-that-had-to-happen. England provides modelled estimates of #FuelPoverty for low-level geographies, which is pretty unique. And @CaitHRobin has analysed that data in depth, in this paper...
The first group of discourses of climate delay aims to *redirect responsibility*. It accepts that *someone* should take action to mitigate climate change, but not us, not right now, not our business / sector / town.
It's when they pretend that climate action is just a question of individuals making different choices. The goal is to avoid talking about anything that goes beyond that.
So Leeds council statement combines several types of climate delay discourse. Let's go through (and debunk) them one by one.
1) what we call "whataboutism". Leeds airport accounts for a trivial amount of air travel emissions, so why bother? Let the others do something about it.