"All your 300+ references get misplaced after you approved the (correct) proofs, so the paper is online but everything is wrong with it. Hope no one sees it & spend a few days correcting references & emailing the journal manager" (TRUE STORY)
"Your special issue article erroneously gets published in a regular issue. Spend your holidays on the phone with the publisher. End up with the same paper published twice, once as "Reprint", with 2 separate DOIs"
"For some reason, after approving the proofs, some of your figures get randomly replaced with others. Spend a lot of time trying to convince the journal to correct this mistake *at least in the online version*"
...and of course, in each of these instances, pay the publisher thousands of $ for the "production costs" of your Open Access paper
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is of course *entirely possible* that the enamourment with eFuels is not authentic, but more a means to an end (= avoiding any move away from the internal combustion engine).
That would make this a "discourse of climate delay" (see paper & thread β¬οΈ
As you might have noticed, I'm not the biggest fan of the automotive industry. But this article on the links between German carmakers and the Orban regime shocked even me. π± Must-read.
This is one of those collaborations-that-had-to-happen. England provides modelled estimates of #FuelPoverty for low-level geographies, which is pretty unique. And @CaitHRobin has analysed that data in depth, in this paper...
The first group of discourses of climate delay aims to *redirect responsibility*. It accepts that *someone* should take action to mitigate climate change, but not us, not right now, not our business / sector / town.
It's when they pretend that climate action is just a question of individuals making different choices. The goal is to avoid talking about anything that goes beyond that.