Hey #LDS#Mormons quick question. Our doctrine says our souls existed before we were born, before the earth was created, before our parents ever had sex. But we have no doctrine on when the soul enters the body. When do you personally believe the soul enters the body?
I'm especially interested in hearing from those of you who are #LDS and believe the soul enters the body at conception. If that's the case, then what's your take on the body + soul in a miscarriage? Was that their shot at a body?
Like, a soul is waiting in the pre-existence, their parents have sex, they are officially conceived, and then the pregnancy miscarries at 12 weeks. Is that tough luck for that soul? That was their experience with a body? Or do they get another chance with another body?
And if that *was* their chance at a body, then why aren't we keeping track of those bodies, and make sure we give them names and genealogical records so we can give them saving ordinances like baptism?
But of course, that begs the question: What about the millions and millions of miscarriages that happen each year that no one knows about? Women frequently miscarry before they even know they were pregnant. How can we give saving ordinances in those cases?
#LDSWomen, since we have no official doctrine on when the soul arrives, what's your personal experience with this? I know the soonest I felt my own children's spirits/souls near me was when I was in labor and they were about to be born. But I never felt them earlier. You?
P.S. — Did you find this thread and think it's a perfect opportunity to talk about how dumb you think LDS doctrine is, or how glad you are that you're not a Mormon anymore? Super cool. Take that shit to another thread or you'll be blocked. Deznats are also an instant block.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Good question. Maybe something involving research and data? Any person should be able to search: “What is perimenopause” and find a specific list of symptoms, what a “normal” or “worrying” expression of each symptom is, & reliable treatment options, etc. We need more information.
And there are endless numbers of people who have experienced it, are experiencing it, or will experience it — so it should be easy to get the information, so it can be analyzed and compiled. But it simply hasn’t been done. The medical research world apparently has no interest.
We need an OTC inexpensive test that tells you if you’re in perimenopause, and how far along the process you are. Instead of cop outs like “every body is different” we should be able to input our medical history and get a description of what we can personally expect.
50% of the worlds population will experience perimenopause. Based just on that stat alone, there should be so much information available, and it should be so commonplace, and the treatments should be so reliable and simple, that it’s like getting a headache and taking an advil.
You’re lecturing me as a doctor, about using the internet, when I said I think there should be more information widely available about perimenopause. Instead, you’re suggesting the following path:
Watched the 3rd episode of Farrow v. Allen. Here is a short, incomplete list of men who should be separated from their dicks+money+legacy:
1. Woody Allen 2. Dr. John M. Leventhal, of the Yale Medicine Child Abuse Program, who repeatedly retraumatized Dylan and protected Woody.
3. Dr. Richard Gardner, who wrote books full of bunk information that condemned millions of kids to additional abuse, and created a widespread culture of painting worried mothers as hysterical liars, because he wanted to “normalize pedophilia”.
I know the documentary is really about Dylan, but we should all be equally pissed off about what Woody Allen did to Soon-Yi. She was a teenager in high school when Woody started secretly dating her. He was in his late 50s at the time. She was 16/17.
A simple thread in which we eliminate poverty in America, build the economy, and ensure Democrats are re-elected, by admitting money is pretend. — Written by Gabrielle Blair, Designer, Mother-of-six, and Twitter’s Premiere Economist. 1/
Premise 1: Our country has enough money to solve every issue we have. More than enough money. Not exaggerating.
Example: If America was attacked today and went to war, our military would immediately have access to unlimited (unlimited!) amounts of money to fund the war. 2/
Premise 2: The National Debt is meaningless. New research particular to our country, shows that increasing or paying down the debt doesn’t really matter. And no politician actually cares about the national debt. They are lying if they say they do. 3/
A little story: “Everything you need to learn to be a rocket scientist is available online, right now, for free."
Several years ago, @BenBlair (my husband) and @JoshStanley (my brother) learned that premise and it stuck with them.
If that premise was true (and they could see it clearly was true), then tuition rates should be falling — and falling fast. But they’re not. U.S. College Tuition is outrageous, and it gets worse every year!
In response, they set out to build the Most Affordable, Accredited, U.S.-based, Degree-Granting University possible — and make it available to students all over the world. And they’ve succeeded.
Permit me to brag a bit about what they’ve built and why it's so cool.
Hey IQ people. Talking about your IQ does the opposite of what you think it does. When people see your IQ in your bio/handle, they don’t think: Oh! He’s a smartie!
Instead they think: Oh dear. Poor dummy hasn’t figured out IQ scores are meaningless.
At best, we could say an IQ test is a not-very-good personality guide, though much less useful than Myers-Briggs, Enneagram, or Astrology, because it doesn’t even attempt to help you self-reflect or improve your interpersonal relationships.
That said, anyone who talks about their IQ is almost guaranteed to be a jerk. So I guess we could say the test is useful to help identify jerks? IQ test as jerk predictor?