In World War II, the people mattered (to Churchill)
“What then is the over-all strategic concept which we should inscribe today? It is nothing less than the safety and welfare, the freedom and progress, of all the homes and families of all the men and women in all the lands” (1)
“And here I speak specifically of the myriad cottage or apartment homes where the wage-earner strives amid the accidents and difficulties of life to guard his wife and children from privation and bring the family up in the fear of the Lord,…” (2)
“To give security to these countless homes, they must be shielded from the two giant marauders, war and tyranny.We all know the frightful disturbances in which the ordinary family is plunged when the curse of war swoops down upon the breadwinner and those for whom he works…” (3)
“When I stand here this quiet afternoon I shudder to visualize what is actually happening to millions now and what is going to happen in this period when famine stalks the earth. None can compute what has been called ‘the unestimated sum of human pain’”. (4)
“Our supreme task and duty is to guard the homes of the common people from the errors and miseries of another war. We are all agreed on that”. (5)
“We cannot be blind to the fact that the liberties enjoyed by individual citizens throughout the British Empire are not valid in a considerable number of countries, some of which are very powerful”. (6).
“In these States control is enforced upon the common people by various kinds of all-embracing police governments. The power of the State is exercised without restraint, either by dictators, or by compact oligarchies operating through a privileged party and a political police” (7)
“we must never cease to proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of man which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world and which through Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury,” (8)
“and the English common law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of Independence”.
“All this means that the people of any country have the right, and should have the power by constitutional action, to free unfettered elections, with secret ballot,” (9)
“to choose or change the character or form of government under which they dwell; the freedom of speech and thought should reign; that courts of justice, independent of the executive, unbiased by any party, should administer laws which have received the broad assent” (10)
“of large majorities or are consecrated by time and custom. Here are the title deeds of freedom which should be in every cottage home. Here is the message of the British and American peoples to mankind”. (11)
“Let us preach what we practice – let us practice what we preach”.
Sir Winston Churchill.
Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri, USA.
5th March 1946. (12)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Noakes

Tim Noakes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfTimNoakes

5 Apr
Once upon a time, there were real leaders. Not puppets.
When Winston Churchill became UK Prime Minister on 13th May 1940, Britain faced its greatest challenge – the reasonable certainty of invasion of the British Isles and highly probable defeat and subjugation by the Nazis (1).
Had Churchill been a 21st Century politician facing uncertainty, he’d have chosen the language of fear. Instead he allayed the Nation (and the World’s) worst fears by speaking only of the coming hardships and the certainty of victory (2).
“We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all our strength that God can give us: (3)
Read 7 tweets
9 Mar
He's so right. If you have to obsess over something, obsess over insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, T2DM. Rest is pretty irrelevant. Latest study from the Women's Health Initiative reported in JAMA in January FINALLY proves this jamanetwork.com/journals/jamac…
Study's SO IMPORTANT because it comes from Women's Health Initiative which began in 1993 with specific goal of proving that low-fat "heart-healthy" US Dietary Guidelines will prevent T2DM, CHD, cancer, obesity etc. So authors' bias would always be to find in favour of that diet
So what did the study find?
T2DM increased risk of developing CHD 10-FOLD; metabolic syndrome 6-fold; hypertension 5-fold; obesity 4-fold! The best biomarker was lipoprotein insulin resistance at 6.4 fold increased risk. Nothing else came close. But what of LDL-Cholesterol?
Read 6 tweets
18 May 20
I've spent the last 12 months writing this @CrossFitHealth series on the great Ancel Keys Cholesterol Con. This column introduced 70 key events that happened over the past 100 years which first established the Con and then helped sustain it right to today
crossfit.com/health/ancel-k…
The reason why I've spent so long on this project is because since 2012 I've been accused repeatedly of "cherry-picking" evidence. Of course that's nonsensical since in my #HPCSA trial, as reported in #RealFoodonTrial, I presented 9.5 days of testimony without "cherry picking"
In these 70 events I've included every single (credible) study that has ever been used to support Keys Great Cholesterol Con. There is no "cherry picking". Which would be silly anyway since, when properly analysed, there are none, as far as I can see, that support his hypothesis.
Read 5 tweets
1 Oct 19
1/20 In rebuttal Drs Willett and Hu of @HarvardChanSPH continue to press Harvard’s plant-based anti-meat agenda. Was not always so at @HarvardChanSPH. May 1952 edition of Postgraduate Medicine carried an Editorial – Comments on Cholesterol – by Harvard’s Hegsted, Mann and Stare
@HarvardChanSPH 2/20 ‘…it should be pointed out that when exhaustive statistical analysis is required to show the correlation between two variables, such as lipoprotein level and atherosclerosis, it usually means that there are many other variables …’
@HarvardChanSPH 3/20 ‘whose effects are unknown or uncontrolled and that such correlations are of relatively LITTLE VALUE for predictive purposes. The fact that one may be able to show statistically significant correlation between two variables…’
Read 20 tweets
26 Jul 19
Suggestion: The 1977 USDGA should be called the President Eisenhower Diet after first eminent person to be prescribed the diet (by Ancel Keys PhD and Paul Dudley White MD in 1955) following President's 1st heart attack amzn.to/2ZzyigE
Over next 14 yrs, Eisenhower suffered 6 further heart attacks. His heart was defibrillated 14 times. He died in intractable heart failure. Heart transplant was not considered, amongst other reasons, because it was finally realised that he had T2DM (diagnosis originally missed)
At autopsy ”coronary atherosclerotic occlusive disease, multifocal, severe, with multiple recanalized thrombi” (p.321) is reported. His right coronary artery is patent; left anterior descending coronary artery has 10% narrowings; his circumflex artery is totally obstructed.
Read 7 tweets
22 Jun 19
Thanks @J_Imagineering So here’s my argument.
1. Humans eating rapidly assimilated carbohydrates develop post-prandial hyperglycemia in proportion to the rate at which glucose is absorbed from the intestine bit.ly/1ExzbZs (primate study noted).
2. Is there any evidence that postprandial hyperglycemia is good and serves an evolutionarily valuable function? Answer: Probably not. Supporting evidence: Why do human have a total circulating blood glucose mass of only 5 grams?
3. If post-prandial hyperglycemia is not desirable (in fact, probably harmful – see problems in T2DM) and has no evolutionary value, then why does it happen?
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!