Once you seal yourself inside a metal box you lose a huge amount of senses, that said you are less likely to become a casualty to arty/mortar fire etc.
This isn't particularly surprising, but does perhaps indicate German crew should have been more willing to unbutton. /2
But again, there is this key cultural difference between British and German approaches - that underpins a).
Losing nerve is harder to judge, but numerous German tanks were KOed around Rauray so it's likely confidence was undermined & unexpected losses shook tank crews. /3
b) Probably German doctrine! Be static and aim for quick KO of enemy over manoeuvre. Panther's in theatre reliability at this point was pretty garbage. Mechanical failure saw Panthers repeatedly stutter out around Rauray and get KOed in crap positions. /3
Comment about bailing from 75mm HE ? Well... they were probably suitably shaken up by HE & suffered some internal catastrophe. HE bails fairly common.
c) You don't get no kill confirmation in real life. Fire helps.
d) A general shift to HE over AP against front armour... /4
This was part of a more common trend and appears effective, as the aim was to just throw crew inside around a bit/damage optics etc.
e) No point plinking away if you just reveal your position to get knocked and can't KO target. /5
f) Meaty one. Fire and manoeuvre helped 24th Lancers appear move numerically superior, repeatedly frustrating German tank crews. Just as they solved one tactical puzzle, another presented itself. Numerous KOed tanks/anti-tank guns were also used as lures etc. /6
This also points to German doctrine adherence, remaining static & engaging targets to guarantee quick KO. Indecision points to slow adaption in theatre, as the terrain in Normandy doesn't really fit what they've trained for. It takes several weeks for them to adapt. /7
British crews have to be patient and wait for quarry to move, then when they do so - exploit the window and engage side/rear armour.
The funny thing is... many elements of this report mimic elements of German comments about Allied tank crews!/8
It's further material that indicates German tank crew DID struggle to adapt to conditions in Normandy & pretty rigidly adhered to doctrine.
Also spicy pointers at why both sides set out to burn out AFVs - thus proving kill. /thread
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Norman buildings are built well, especially churches and farmhouses - as both sides discovered in Normandy.
This required creativity. /1
#WW2 #SWW #History
#DDay80
In short, there was no magic solution to cracking defences in Normandy, sure AVREs had massive 290mm petard mortars but these were specialist assets.
Not always available, or in the right place at the right time. /2
German troops had better mortars than Second Army, and integral infantry guns in each Regiment. Due to problems developing 95mm the British lacked this capability & came to use attached Churchill V or other 95mm gun tanks to achieve this role.
4 August 1944
“PIAT! PIAT! PIAT!"
Lt Donald Harvey, 244 Field Company Royal Engineers, alongside D Coy 1 Oxf & Bucks.
Probably the best PIAT related quote of the Normandy campaign, said as a Waffen-SS battlegroup appeared behind a British battalion. /1
#WW2 #SWW #History #DDay80
I could go into this action in much more detail, but it's almost unbelievable - saving it for another day...
Soon.
A genuinely ridiculous scrap.
Moving on... /2
PIAT was the infantry platoon's principle manhandled anti-tank weapon. 1 per platoon. A real marmite weapon, most complaints stem from poor handling & faulty munitions.
One of the dullest, coolest, more bizarre and fascinating pieces of kit used in Normandy.
Which no one *really* cares abou5.
But I do, and you should too... /1
#WW2 #SWW #History #DDay80
Planning for Overlord and Neptune had a serious snag, how to get troops from LSTs onto the beach as simply ramming them up onto the beaches and dropping the ramp was known to damage the exceptionally vulnerable LSTs and felt to be unsustainable in the mid to long term. /2
LSTs were essential in sustaining Overlord's progress and were a subject of major headaches in the planning phase, and a real subject of friction when it came to launching additional amphibious operations such as Op Dragoon.
Loss of a single LST represented a capability nick. /3
I mean surely a bulldozer can't be a key component of Allied victory?
Wrong!
Let's have a look at the D-7 Dozer & Allied logistics in Normandy. /1
#WW2 #SWW #History #DDay80
First off, Normandy was a bit of a rural backwater.
The road network was no where near as developed as today, which incorporates many routes constructed/improved by Allied forces.
The land of William the Conqueror place for farming, fishing, market towns with a few railways. /2
21st Army Group had arguably the most enviable engineering services in the world, able to throw up bridges in under a day, construct massive hospitals, water points, fuel depots, pipelines, bypasses (frankly mini-motorways), airfields, command complexes... and much more. /2
What was it to fight in a 6 week battle of pure attrition, where all that mattered was the complete destruction of the enemy?
A battle where any movement could get you & your mates killed?
Well... /1
#WW2 #SWW #History #DDay80
Marksmen played a major role, as Ran Williams discovered when his 13 Platoon took over 7 Seaforths most exposed position.
Upon seeing the fresh lieutenant, the sergeant pulled out a machete, slicing off Ran's epaulettes and shoulder titles... /2
Snipers developed a particularly dangerous reputation, and Brigadier Michael Carver stamped on what he felt was 'particularly jittery' behaviour from 53rd Welsh early on, ordering that marksmen were now to be called 'isolated enemy riflemen'.
How did this piece of open topped herp-a-derp become the coolest piece of kit in infantry battalions scrapping their way through liberating North West Europe?*
I know you're curious...
Read on. /1
#WW2 #SWW #History #DDay80
The Universal Carrier came about in 1940 as a desire to streamline production processes & merge the Bren Gun and Scout Carriers' roles into a single AFV.
The former's name stuck and gained popular traction.
Bren Carrier (below) for Infantry Battalions' Carrier Platoons. /2
The Scout Carrier was intended to operate alongside Vickers Mk VI Light Tanks for Divisional Reconnaissance Regiments etc.
Various traits of both vehicles, bar the obvious Horstmann suspension, that carried over into the Universal Carrier are quite evident. /3