8 April 2021 #MAGAanalysis

The Question Of Q Nation

Dan Scavino has a channel at Telegram, here’s something he posted there, yesterday. It doesn't say anything about Q, but there's a strong tie we'll discuss in a moment.

t.me/ScavinoChannel…
2) A friend of mine shared this in a Telegram group I'm a member of, and I'd have found it interesting on its own. Thing is, the tie to Q is actually very strong, indeed. Let's look at the key point...
3) "...Trump will reclaim the throne soon and a lot of people will be gone for the good of our country, starting with Biden and the ones who are pulling the strings."
4) That's a spectacular call for him to make. Trump has "a lot of people" who will "be gone for the good of our country." Typically, I'd just dismiss such a statement with 4 years of disappointment over the failure of our Justice system leading to the stolen election.
5) But Scavino goes right there. Not just these people who may be "gone" by any of large number of non-enumerated ways, but actually "retake the throne" and get rid of Biden and the "ones pulling the strings." He even says, "starting with Biden." Now that's a WOW moment.
6) My actual response, by discipline, is to reject the call due to the fact that it is so precisely what I want to occur. I'm pretty sure most now have the term "confirmation bias" bopping around in mind, and that's what I accuse myself of. I SO WANT THIS!
7) A more cynical interpretation might be that the Trump team - Trump World - knows of our desire, knows of our donating pocketbooks, knows that hope springs eternal and feeds our hope while raising funds from us. That, however, is too easy a dismissal.
8) And that brings us back to Q Nation. Hidden, coming arrests was a tremendous theme of the Q analysis during the entirety of Trump's 1st term. The fact of these hidden things, somehow known and to occur by The Plan, but which frequently did not occur kept me at a distance.
9) If anyone on the Q Team were interested in my thoughts, I'd share the two terms, "failure analysis." Put a deadline on your call. Make the call binary, it either happens or doesn't, obviously. And then, brag over successes, analyze failures publicly. Claiming them.
10) Jeff Sessions was not a good guy. Neither was Bill Barr or John Durham. You may disagree. Fine. But who remembers the movie Jerry Maguire? Show me the money. Show me the love. Show me the arrests. And if not, show me the analysis of your failed calls.
11) If Dan Scavino were asking me about his prediction, I'd say, "Dan, my man, will it happen before or after the midterms? If not before, you're just teasing us. If it happens after, that will be dramatic, but it won't be satisfying enough. Half a term? Come on."
12) Well that would be my first thought, but then I'd retract it like so. "Alright, let's say we retake the throne as late as January 2024. If we take down the entire fraudulent election structure, and do it by Constitutionally solid methods, well, history matters."
13) As I was saying, I'd have had all those thoughts just reading Dan's Telegram post. But the day before, another one of my friends, met here at Twitter but since purged, by the name of Jo Pappas, threw this article at me:

martingeddes.activehosted.com/index.php?acti…
14) Funny thing, Scavino might as well have been quoting Geddes. Now that's interesting. I'll give you the key quote from Geddes, next. Jo knew I'd read Geddes skeptically, but with interest and I did. Here's the quote...
15) "In retrospect we can now see the fuller role of the Q drops in the Second American Revolution. The most crucial function of a corrupt mass media is to help engineer the outcome of rigged elections. This maintains a veneer of legitimacy for the criminal ruling class.
16) "The 2020 Presidential election was a set-up and sting operation to draw out every corrupt actor involved in this crime — which has been going on for decades, and not just in the United States.
17) "Via the Q operation there has been several years of quiet alliance building between the military and a substantial part of the public.
18) "These "anons" are the community of radicals who see the nakedness of the orthodox media narrative and the true nature of the constitutional crisis.
19) "This tacit alliance now gives the military a necessary space of a few months to run "The Bidan Show" while the clean-up and arrest operation happens in secret, since this involves acts of war by foreign powers, and has global implications."
20) Alas, this just in from my friend @BeAVibe, who informs me the Scavino announcement was NOT from the man himself, but from a fan channel at Telegram. Drats, fooled by the Internet again!
21) Allow me to quickly emphasize my friend Jo did NOT send me that story, she sent me the fascinating Geddes analysis. Alas again, however. The fact the fans might put those words in Dan Scavino's mouth, or at least allow such misinterpretation is a thing.
22) If you take the time - and it's long - to read Geddes' story, you'll find he's a serious man with a serious mind, and he is 100% dedicated to the work he's doing. I still end up blundering my own way toward the attack of confirmation bias, but let's go deeper than that.
23) We can take from Geddes this simple point. The media sell us malarkey. They do so for a purposeful reason, well beyond media corporation profits. They do so CONSPIRING with what may only be called evil forces in our Government and Ruling Class. My words, but his point.
24) A sleeping giant needs more than just a great leader in order to fully awaken. It needs countless, maybe millions of alarm clocks, all researching and analyzing what's going on behind the curtain of media corruption. The media IS a conspiracy and its denials are laughable.
25) One of the most interesting points that Tom Paine develops is the difference between society and government. The Q factor is a social one and a desperately needed factor at that. Right now, it is society against government. That is where we are.
26) Government enjoys a concentration of power, and the legal right of the use of force. We are dispersed and prohibited - rightly, I quickly add - from the use of force for any purpose other than defense. This imbalance demands a social movement like Q.
27) I encourage all to read Geddes' article. He opens up a window into the Q phenomenon that is different than any I've previously encountered. What's more, I fervently hope that Q will NOT disappear or fade away.
28) No, it's extremely unlikely that I will ever become a Q anon - I'm pretty public of course - and its dynamics do not invite a guy like me to "join." I'm not a joiner anyway. But one doesn't have be what I call a Q follower, in order to be a Q supporter.
29) I'll always be clear. I don't believe that Geddes is correct in his conclusion. I don't buy that the fraudulent election was a sting operation. I hold no hope of Trump's replacing Biden at any point prior to 2024. I do not take hope from such things.
30) But if you, or anyone you know does, make sure you let them know that they should be proud of that Q flashing out all over their identity, and that you support them completely. Agreement is vastly overrated.

Don't you agree?
Thread ends at #30.

Come meet Jo in our Telegram discussion - do say hi to her! - and help us work out truth from fiction, and build the strongest basis of hope and action we can.

t.me/TheConsigliori

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pasquale "Pat" Scopelliti

Pasquale

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThyConsigliori

9 Apr
9 April 2021 #MAGAanalysis

The Fox vs The Hedgehog, The US vs China

Who remembers Peter Sellers in the 1966 film, After The Fox? Not many I’ll bet, but it’s simply the perfect intro to today’s topic, as set up by a fantastic analysis we’ll turn to right now. Image
2) In the film, Peter Sellers portrays a brilliant, if hilarious thief called The Fox, as he is a master of disguise and trickery. Last month, the always profound historian Niall Ferguson deems the US to be a Fox in foreign policy.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
3) If you decide to read Ferguson's analysis, you have to be ready to push yourself to read both between and underneath the lines. I believe he's a true conservative living behind enemy lines where he has to pretend RINO bonafides. I know, complicated set of ideas there...
Read 31 tweets
7 Apr
7 April 2021 #MAGAanalysis

A Time For Grieving

It's surprising that, in serving local patriots, ramping up our study and preparation for the battle we must wage, the topic of grief keeps resurfacing. But I think I may know why the reading list causes this effect for many.
2) Truth is, it is impossible to calculate or measure what's been lost. The obvious part is a stolen, landslide election. But it goes so much farther than that. To my own eye, I now divide America into two stages:

America I: 1776 - 2020
America II: 2021 - Unknown
3) I'll explain how I feel this grief in relationship to my own studies and preparations in a moment. First, I want to go slowly over Ecclesiastes 3: 1 - 8. Each verse will be its own tweet next.
Read 81 tweets
6 Apr
6 April 2021 #MAGAanalysis

Local Patriot’s Intense Studies

Yesterday, we completed introductions to all 12 books on the list. Today we're going to discuss intense studying, a type of extraordinary ownership.
2) As I read book 3, The Office of the Sheriff - A History, a vision struck me. I saw a civilian citizen of the county who dedicated himself to being a true friend to the sheriff, and thereby to the county itself. I know the power of just one friend.
3) If you were following along, you worked through various attacks on the challenge until the current reading list clarified itself. It kind of arose, if that makes sense. Now that we've completed the introductions, a new question arises.
Read 42 tweets
5 Apr
5 April 2021 #MAGAanalysis

#12 Common Sense – Because Benghazi and Other Reasons

Looking through my books, Common Sense did not jump off the shelf at me this morning. An inkling formed. Sure enough. All his works are now on my Kindle for just $.99. Not even a dollar. Awesome! Image
2) I've shared that it was Ron Paul who introduced me to Bastiat. I don't remember exactly how reading Bastiat threw me back to Common Sense, but it did. I do remember Benghazi. Do you remember how "Because Benghazi" became a point of scorn?
3) I'm embarrassed to confess I supported McCain in '08 and Romney in '12. That is, until Romney failed his duty over Benghazi. Romney's instinct was right. He called it out the moment it occurred. Then the Obama people called him on the carpet and he capitulated.
Read 26 tweets
4 Apr
4 April 2021 #MAGAanalysis

#11 America First – The MAGA Manifesto

Where Alinsky - #10 - is hard to read, my own and @KateScopelliti’s book is hard to introduce. I have struggled with promoting our book. And yet, our book is critically important.

amazon.com/America-First-…
2) To understand our book, you need to watch a Trump rally. Grand Rapids, Michigan, the early morning hours of November 8, 2016. Trump has perfected his message in every possible way. He has perfected the MAGA message.

3) The art of the rally. Who remembers that the media tried to tell us that Trump rallies would NOT generate votes? Oh, they said, anyone can go to a rally and be entertained. Will they vote? Of course not, we were told. Rallies don't generate votes, we were told.
Read 21 tweets
3 Apr
3 April 2021 #MAGAanalysis

The #ConstitutionalAlinskyProtocol

Here again are Alinsky’s Rules. We will move on tomorrow. Today, we plumb them just as rules, as if they were more than right, but FOR the right. I claim them, for us, for the US. Please imagine.
2) First, here they follow in Tweetable format. I'll simply employ a slightly different format. We'll pick up on our discussion after.
1/ Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
Read 54 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!