1. Office of the Spokesperson
The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken spoke today with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Teodoro Locsin, Jr. Both expressed their shared concerns with the
lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJI…
2. massing of PRC maritime militia vessels in the South China Sea, including at Whitsun Reef, and reiterated their calls on the PRC to abide by the 2016 arbitration ruling issued pursuant to the Law of the Sea Convention. Secretary Blinken also reaffirmed the
3. applicability of the 1951 U.S.-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty to the South China Sea. Secretary Blinken and Secretary Locsin welcomed enhanced bilateral and multilateral cooperation on the South China Sea. Secretary Blinken also discussed the
4. Administration’s efforts to combat rising hate and violence against Asian-Americans.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Hogan

Tim Hogan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TimInHonolulu

8 Apr
1. Do you think Putin's crew knows about "The Trading with the Enemy Act?" It applies to nations and its nationals if the US is "at war" with the nation. It doesn't define "at war" as far as I can see. I searched for the term "at war." Found this is still in the books:
2. 25 U.S. Code § 128 Appropriations not paid to Indians at war with United States

None of the appropriations made for the Indian Service shall be paid to any band of Indians or any portion of any band while at war with the United States or with the white citizens of any of the
3. States or Territories. (Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 132, § 2, 18 Stat. 449.) law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25…
Read 7 tweets
1 Apr
1. Kommersant tends to not openly engage in disinformation but it appears that may be changing. They are reporting the Sec Def readout
Минобороны Украины сообщило о гарантиях поддержки США при конфликте с Россией // Подробнее на сайте kommersant.ru/doc/4753396
2. to say that the US will go to war over a Russian attack on Ukraine. Here is the readout where Sec. Austin made clear he was reiterating "U.S. commitment to building the capacity of Ukraine's forces to defend more effectively against Russian aggression." Putin and the state
3. propaganda machine is trying to impact Russian perceptions to give the impression that war with the US is coming. This could be grooming the Russian public for a war or Putin's wagging the dog to divert public attention from Navalny, economic problems & the coming sanctions.
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar
1. #Syria #SDF: Excerpt from Briefing with Acting Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS John Godfrey On U.S. Participation in the Upcoming D-ISIS Ministerial.

state.gov/briefing-with-…
2. "On Syria, our partnership with the Syrian Democratic Forces remains strong. We continue to support them in the coalition’s fight against ISIS and the SDF continues to do great work in maintaining pressure against ISIS in the northeast part of the
3. country. We continue to closely monitor ISIS activity throughout the country and assess that ISIS has continued its efforts to regroup and carry out attacks in non-SDF-controlled areas – particularly, as one example, in the Badia desert.
Read 7 tweets
27 Mar
1. Why is Trump concerned about John Durham? First, his appointment violated DOJ regs that required he be unconnected to DOJ.

"The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government."

28 CFR 28 CFR § 600.3 - Qualifications of the Special Counsel.
2. As the US Attorney for CN he accepted an appointment that violated the law and on that grounds could be removed and investigated for an ethics violation. So why is everyone being quiet at DOJ @JudiciaryDems and in the Beltway echo chamber?
3. My guess is that Durham agreed to accept the unlawful appointment because he believed the keeping Trump placated was advancing the cause of Justice. Is he actually engaged in an investigation of Trump's Russian conspiracy in 2016? If he were that might be a reason to keep
Read 7 tweets
26 Mar
1. I don't want to lessen the threat that these voter suppression efforts represent but by limiting absentee voting, the GQP is impairing the way much of how its largest demographic votes. Not smart. Also, by trying to suppress POC votes the GQP makes every
2. election an existential threat to @TheDemocrats base, especially POC. Their current push for state legislatures to deny people the right to vote is already building Democratic party turnout for the 2022 midterms.
3. By energizing @theDemocrats' base the GQP will geta a high Democratic turnout when the GQP will struggle to turn out its own voters. GQP strategy is going to increase or at least hold the Democrats' turnout in an election without the orange pied piper of hate.
Read 5 tweets
25 Mar
Another email. Here is the current position.
It just moved again.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!