1/ Head of Budget and Finance Committee @IbrahimKanaan accuses unnamed Govt advisors/others of having purchased Credit Default Swaps (CDS) on Leb Eurobonds and then pushed for default to make a profit. Any trader could've explained to him why this is far-fetched had he only asked
2/ I suggest the MP hire advisers as these are technical topics and we can't keep wasting time on this nonsense over and over again.
While not my job, I did the research for anyone who's interested.
3/ As most of you know, CDS is like an insurance product. The CDS Buyer gets paid out by the CDS Seller if there is a default on the bonds. To keep it simple, the Buyer pays the Seller a fee or premium to buy this insurance.
4/ The size of this fee indicates the market's view on the probability the bond will default. By Nov 2019, the premium was already pricing in a near certainty of default. That is, the free market, ppl with money on the line, expected that Lebanon will default because it's broke.
5/ Not only that, the probability of default was so high that the CDS Buyer had to pay all of the fees upfront (ie "points upfront"). Usually a CDS Buyer can pay over the duration of the "insured" period. But when the risk is too high, the Seller asks for an upfront payment.
6/ Together, points 4 and 5 above, tell you that the price to buy CDS was so high by Nov/Dec 2019, before Diab's government took office, that it was nearly impossible to make a profit out of it. It was just way too expensive.
7/ That is, imagine you want to insure $10 million worth of Lebanese eurobonds. You'd buy a CDS and potentially have to pay upfront $6-7+ million because the Seller expects that these bonds will almost certainly default soon. There is no real profit margin.
8/ CDS also aren't instruments you can trade like stocks. Your average investor can't access this market. Big institutions can. You can't buy $500,000 of CDS. These are contracts typically above $10 million in size or more.
9/ Which idiot Govt advisor is going to pay this massive premium, risk losing all of this money, to make maybe a small profit, all while betting that the entire Lebanese political leadership will make a decision that none of us thought was even possible until Feb/March 2020?
10/ Most of the CDS bought and sold were hedges, part of package trades. @lebfinance has explained this. You OWN the bond and you PAY for CDS to insure it. This isn't speculation. It is real insurance, as you lose money on the bond and make up part of your loss with the CDS.
11/ What is being alleged is uncovered CDS buying, meaning the person doesn't own the underlying bond. They aren't hedging their exposure to the bond, but are speculating on default only. They risk losing the entire upfront fee, millions of dollars, to make maybe a small profit.
12/ The MP claims the unnamed advisors pushed for disorderly default in March so that their CDS would pay out. Had they not owned CDS, they may have pushed for an organized default. However, the CDS pay out in both scenarios... So the method of default is irrelevant.
13/ The risk/reward of this trade are so bad that if anyone actually managed to do it, I'd be more concerned that the Govt is hiring morons. They could've made more money on Gamestop.
14/ When Lebanese Banks dumped Eurobonds in Fall 2019, this likely created a growing market for CDS. Foreign investors/dealers were buying bonds that were likely to default and buying CDS insurance with them to hedge. This probably resulted in more CDS trading. See from 2018:
15/ NOT EVERYTHING IS A CONSPIRACY.
16/ For those asking about MP Michel Daher who said on TV that he bought CDS in the past 👇🏽
1/ The first nuclear power plant in the Arab world began commercial operations in UAE last week. Our firm acted as financial advisor to the lenders for this groundbreaking $25+bn project. What does it take to develop & finance a complex nuclear project?
2/ We faced multiple challenges in structuring this and other (very rare) new nuclear project financings over the last 15 years. I'll describe a few general challenges related to nuclear financings, from a bank's perspective.
3/ Construction risk (delays and cost overruns). Nuclear projects are notorious for experiencing large cost overruns and delays.
A nuclear project in Georgia, USA has nearly doubled in cost ($14 bn to $24bn+) and is more than 5 years delayed. It's still not complete.
1/ BDL appears to be proposing that all official intl humanitarian aid (~$1.5bn in 2021) be channeled through BDL and given to recipients in LBP at a rate of 6,200 LBP. BDL says this will allow it to sustain the 1500/3900 subsidy longer. It's a gross misuse of humanitarian aid.
2/ Firstly, as we've said before, the issue is HOW the $ are being used. If the $ are used to sustain the peg, a large portion of which benefits monopolies, smugglers, money launderers, &the wealthy, then the value of the aid is NOT going to the people it's meant to help. For ex:
3/ It doesn't matter if the Govt/BDL gives recipients the aid at a rate of 9,000 LBP! If the actual real $ are squandered, then the country is losing regardless of the rate it gets because the impact will be further inflation.
1/ The Leb financial crisis in one chart. We tend to focus on the blue bar (how the $ were spent to maintain the peg), but that misses half the story. It's not only about why the blue bar decreased, but why the red bar increased (why deposits are so high)? The ratio is the story
2/ The problem is that the ratio of dollars remaining in the system is low *relative to* the amount of deposits that those dollars are needed to cover. It's not that dollars are low in some absolute sense, it's the ratio of the two.
3/ Why are deposits (red bar) so high? Mainly the gov't fiscal deficit financed by BDL and BDL losses due to excessive interest it paid banks on their deposits. BDL had to create new LBP to cover these expenses and this caused the amount of deposits to explode.
The 2020 estimate for remittance inflows to Lebanon aren't that surprising (remittances tend to be stable). But, they are down over the last 5-yrs, worse than comparable countries. And, in 2020 vs. 2019, they are down around the average for the top remittance recipient countries.
So Lebanon performed around the average in terms of remittance inflows in 2020v2019 at a time when the country is in deep trouble with the figure possibly inflated, as @lebfinance mentioned, by many sending money to close out loans (plus after the explosion, etc.).
It is striking that BDL reserves continue to fall despite this level of remittances and the absolutely severe reduction in imports we've seen. It would seem that these $ are not making their way into the financial system (b/c we haven't even started the restructuring process).
I rarely talk about my day job, but a project I've been working on for 5 yrs just won "Global Deal of the Year" for 2020. It's a $20+ bn gas project in Mozambique, the largest investment ever in Africa, all during a pandemic & only 3 yrs after Moz defaulted on its Eurobonds. 1/
Mozambique, a country with limited means, defaulted on its debt, hired intl advisors, restructured its debt, did a forensic audit, negotiated an IMF program, all while setting up the legal/regulatory framework for an incredibly complex multi-billion $ new industry. 2/
This was possible b/c Moz has a Gov't which hires the right advisors for the job & listens to them. They didn't drown the population in misinformation, they didn't put ego & personal interest ahead of the national interest, they didn't use clientelism to destroy the economy. 3/
1/ I appreciate the Minister being keen on the forensic audit, but I'm afraid she's making the same mistake that got us to this point: not anticipating the next step. Remember, they have an incentive to convince you that the audit was set up correctly...they set it up after all.
2/ Claiming that banking secrecy & the Code of Money and Credit are *not* obstacles to a forensic audit designed to uncover how deposits were used & BDL losses incurred is simply not convincing. To do this work, you need to track transactions all the way to the final beneficiary.
3/ Read the excerpts from the laws below and tell me if you don't think these laws would hinder that work. A transaction may look legit on the BDL end. You'd need to track it to its final destination to know if the funds were used as intended. You need client transaction data.