Apart for the amazing confirmation of the existence of OLD PCR+ noted as cases, we can use the official data on cases detected for test type to do some interesting analysis.
1st wave was obviously a PCR issue, not interesting except for little scale due to lower testing.
1st wave was obviously a PCR issue, not interesting except for little scale due to lower testing.
Zooming in 2nd&3rd Waves we observe a CLEAR disproportion between them, depending on test type.
2nd wave was over 2/3 of 3rd thru PCR, but less than 1/3 thru antigen!!
The MUST be same proportion. Why is there EXTRA PCR+ positivity?!
We've talked about it LONG AGO:
OLD cases.
2nd wave was over 2/3 of 3rd thru PCR, but less than 1/3 thru antigen!!
The MUST be same proportion. Why is there EXTRA PCR+ positivity?!
We've talked about it LONG AGO:
OLD cases.
That shows even clearer when you draw observed positivity for PCR&Antigen.
3rd wave, the winter seasonal expected wave, shows similar positivities, meaning every kind of test founding the same, but 2nd wave is unbalanced, with only a 60% of positivity thru Antigen.
3rd wave, the winter seasonal expected wave, shows similar positivities, meaning every kind of test founding the same, but 2nd wave is unbalanced, with only a 60% of positivity thru Antigen.
I remark this is official data. No model.
They KNOW using PCR makes the cases grow.
They KNOW it happens because extremely high Ct are finding old cases.
There's no RATIONAL to ignore that facts for epidemic control, it is A POLITICAL manipulation.
It is a FACT.
They KNOW using PCR makes the cases grow.
They KNOW it happens because extremely high Ct are finding old cases.
There's no RATIONAL to ignore that facts for epidemic control, it is A POLITICAL manipulation.
It is a FACT.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
