It's so interesting: just dividing the test done for the cases found the PREVIOUS week, we can see test pressure is NOT dependent on Epidemic spread BUT political intentions.
It's Madrid data, as we're currently working with.
One usual myth used by trølls and or government, sorry for the redundance, is claiming that is not that rising the number of test increases cases, BUT the raise in case forces increase in test.
It's FALSE.
It's EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE:
More test pressure when lower cases found.
For graph dummies, red line means up to 25 test/case-found are made with low spread, but only 5 during spike.
It should be a straight line, the more u find the more you search, or a Crisis Watch, curve related to Epidemic curve: u search even more when u find.
It's THE OPPOSITE
The political CREATION of the Xmas Irresponsibles is visible during December, specially around Xmas day. Pure political.
They kept rising the number of test donev despite the number of cases they find weren't growing.
THE FEAR MACHINE.
Fear Narrative needs a lot of trick.
1 extra issue we can add thru our True Infection thru Ct Madrid study, is this same cases found/test done, but with TRUE CASES
There's a remarkable different spike, it was used to create the clearly ARTIFICIAL 2nd wave
We've related about it with many other analysis: it's there
It's good to see that manipulation this clear:
There's NO RATIONAL to do more test when less spread is found.
Except u have political intention: here, fear mongering.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Twitter is build for noise.
Very often I need to Google my own old tweets, as TL is a dark, chaotic, bottomless pit.
I'm gathering here our team's
main original work, with their link and a little description, as an easy way to find them, both for me and anyone interested.
This is our statistically true daily infection reconstruction.
It uses the time from infection to death curve proportionally for each decease.
Deaths is the less manipulable series, and time curve is not disputed even among covidlievers.
The Madrid Region dossier we've been commenting lately is full of proofs of appalling intentions from our gov'ts.
The sheet on universal screenings shows the LACK of test confirmation after a positive.
The protocol includes not this step, and ONE positive is noted as 'Case'
There IS redundant check for NEGATIVES, as we see in the Close Contact protocol sheet.
Antigen negative is double checked thru PCR.
It also shows that EVEN negative test have quarantine consequences.
If every PCR+ mean case, without check, it means accepting ALL FALSE POSITIVES
But the worst antiscientifical manipulation, for me, hides in the footnote
PCR is specially recommended in LOW PREVALENCE SCREENINGS
There's a purely MATHEMATICAL rational for low prevalence suffering high proportion of False Positives, plain, non "covid is new" debatable truth
La Comunidad de Madrid ha publicado un documento con información sobre los Ct de los PCR positivos, que incluye un criterio para su interpretación.
Según ese documento LA PANDEMIA QUE NOS CUENTAN ES FALSA, en, al menos, un 40%
Y lo saben.
La oficial, en azul
La REAL, en rojo
El documento presenta una tabla de valores de CT semanales para las PCR positivas.
Incluye el % de positivos con Ct <20, >30 y el promedio de los positivos.
Es fácil calcular el % de piernas con CT 21-29.
Representamos las 3 franjas, 21-29 en negro.
Con estos 3 datos planteamos valores promedio para cada tramo
Consideramos la media del grupo <20 =20, probamos valores para >30 que produzcan Ct compatibles en la franja 21-29
El grupo >30 debe tener un promedio de 36, o la franja 21-29 arrojaría incompatibles Ct promedio >30