I didn't see any news on the dilution target they're aiming for, but generally a dose rate of 1 mSv is the maximum level allowed by public health authorities for tritium release.
Here's a fact sheet from the Canadian nuclear regulator:
Just found this nice article in Forbes, penned by the always-intelligent James Conca. It covers everything I mentioned in my tweet & more, with more precise data as well.
This is a science question, not a politics question. Let scientists deal with it.
So an update thread on this...I bought a smart controller for my AC, per the suggestion from @Silmarillion88 .
It was pretty easy to install...just plug the device into the wall and plug the AC into the device. Then you download the manufacturer's app and pair with the device.
Point 1:
There are 5 damaged fuel rods in the Taishan Unit 1 core, in accordance with EDF statement yesterday and general commentary/predictions from nuclear industry tweeps. Well below design basis for continued operations of the reactor, so no shutdown expected.
Point 2:
An increase in radioactivity in the primary loop is indeed very different from a release outside of the plant. As long as that is the case, this is an operations issue for plant personnel, not a public safety concern.
1) Taishan is a Chinese plant built with French technology with a large French equity stake and Framatome is a French MNC offering technical services everywhere around the world (including the USA).
2)
Taishan is owned by CGN, which is on the US Entity List. Thus it would normally be forbidden to transfer US-derived technical information or data to CGN. A waiver may be obtained, however, for reasons of "operational safety", which is what Framatome is applying for.
3) They're likely applying because either A. the information they are preparing to transfer originated in the US, or B. they don't want to impact their business in the US by doing work with CGN without full transparency. Probably both actually.
Beyond the (non-hydro) RE consumption goals for 2021 and 2025, the notice also mentions the objective of hitting 25% non-fossil (includes hydro) energy consumption in time for the carbon peak in 2030, with at least 1200 GWs of solar and wind.
3
The next item in the notice mentions the need for each provincial region to increase its 'weight of responsibility' 责任权重 for RE consumption.
This is a reference to the next round of renewable portolio standard (RPS) levels, i.e. the minimum RE consumption level.
I'd like to use this nice news thread from @YanQinyq about China's new Renewable Energy FiTs as a foundation to talk about amazingly quickly Chinese solar and wind power production costs have come down in China.
FiT means Feed-in-Tariff. It's the rate that the grid company pays the generating company for its power.
These are the Chinese utility-scale solar PV FiTs for the last decade. The regions are determined by abundance of solar irradiation (i.e. natural solar resources).
The important thing to note about FiTs is that they were MUCH higher than tariffs for coal generated power. This is because the cost of developing solar (or wind) used to be much higher.
For comparsion, coal power prices across the country these days are 0.24-0.45 RMB/kWh.