I tend not to post on COVID - I’ve no special knowledge in this area.
But it strikes me a likely outcome is vaccines will be successful in national terms but new variants spreading internationally.
So we could find normality returning locally...but international travel limited.
2/
If this is right - & it’s just speculation - we may find that countries will, to avoid locking themselves down, attempt to form stronger regional groups with common strict import/personal controls.
This would accelerate regional groupings along (sub)continental lines.
3/
These regional groups would have to impose strict migration/travel controls on those entering. Perhaps testing or even vaccinations for new variants.
But the area would have to be as tight as national controls.
4/
A country will thus seek to demonstrate its attractiveness to potential partners by impressing upon them the completeness of its vaccination program AND its commitment to shared & strong border bubble.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nigel Boardman appointed to lead investigation into David Cameron lobbying scandal.
Boardman knows Cameron well as he was personally appointed by Cameron to the highly prestigious British Museum trustees.
Boardman was also implicated in fee gouging in the Carillon bankruptcy.
2/
Also not really clear if Nigel Boardman’s task of leading an investigation into David Cameron’s lobbying is compatible with his other position - a non-executive role on the board of the UK govt BEIS department.
3/
Interestingly Boardman is responsible for seeing that govt contracts & business was carried out properly - so in a sense Boardman has now been tasked with investigating his - and his employer’s - the Govt - own failure.
When I was growing up "ex-pat" meant a western manager working with a western firm/institution on a western contract & expenses in a developing country or the Middle East.
Nobody ever used the word to describe poor British pensioners trying to get by on a state pension in Spain.
One doesnt have to call oneself an immigrant.
UK citizen will do.
But ex-pat is about the legacy of empire.
Its about wanting to claim a higher status of someone who has power in someone elses country.
Not an immigrant or foreign, but a privleged member of the British abroad.
3/
But its actually worse than this.
Essentially the unexpressed logic behind this is that even the poorest Brit abroad is granted the status of "ex-pat"...
...while even the most skilled, qualified foreigner in Britain is an "immigrant" (excepting of course Americans).
I back PR & rejoin before my allegiance to any party.
Not just in word but in deed.
I’m a member of at least one political group.
I’ll vote for a party - Labour - in my constituency that has the best chance of removing the Tories.
Guys it’s not difficult.
We need to play smart.
2/
There’s things you can say in public and things ones has to be a bit more “circumspect” about on public platforms.
It should be clear to all where I’ve been going on this and what the strategy has to be.
Are you going to mess around or are you going to make a difference?
3/
So it can never be about “just” tactical voting.
Exert a direct influence on parties even where, personally, that particular party wasn’t traditionally your 1st choice.
The Northern Independence Party is a spoiler party led by Corbynite activists.
Its stated goals are virtually impossible for it to achieve..tho its main (largely unstated) achievable aim is to peel of Labour votes in traditional Labour areas to derail any potential Labour govt.
2/
Large % of members London based as expected for a Corbynite spoiler party as are many leading figures.
Northern independence isn’t going to happen however the real aim - the destruction of a viable centre-left govt in an age of Johnson & Trump II is their holy grail.
3/
People think it’s a fun even jokey outfit or failing that a genuine grassroots party.
It’s not.
It’s a well run PR outfit.
The point is to ensure Labour lose seats and to destroy possibility of a centre left for a generation.
At the risk of boring people
We didn’t get Brexit “thanks to northerners”
Northerners were in fact less enthusiastic about referendum in terms of turnout than many areas and in % terms than the midlands.
The redwall obsession is a continuation of a London media myth.
3/
In England “people voted Brexit not areas”.
Young (<40), Students & graduates moved to cities & south and voted remain which tipped often brexity areas into remain seats.
Many who haven’t really understood 2016...now of course cannot understand 2024.