Of course, his analysis implies he knows better than Yellen or Powell or the WH economic team, that he understands the correlation between stimulus and inflation in a way not supported by data, and that Biden's plan is entirely targeted toward COVID relief.
The American Jobs Plan is also about rebuilding infrastructure that deficit hawks like Summers let degrade, about enhancing US competitiveness in the future, about creating jobs and about addressing other deficiencies.
Notable among these deficiencies--and a target of a broad array of Biden plans--is not recovery from just from COVID but from 40 years of neo-liberal policies (like those supported by Summers) that have exacerbated inequality to dangerous and unsustainable levels in the US.
For all that-certainty about issues about which he should be uncertain, dishonestly reframing the debate to suit his arguments, etc.--at its core, this also comes down to ego, to the end finally being written to a frankly, unhappy, damaging chapter in Dem Econ policymaking.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don't have much of a brain for religion. It just doesn't really register with me. So a couple years ago when my wife and I were wandering around Jerusalem and we happened to go into the Church of the Holy Sepulchre it did not really register with me that it was Easter.
After wandering through the church, we got to the main rotunda and almost immediately it began filling with people. Soon a choir began to sing and then we were swept into a group that was walking in circles around the aedicule which supposedly contains the tomb of Jesus.
The three different sects that have rights to the church were represented--Eastern Orthodox, Catholic and Armenian Apostolic--as well as Coptic Orthodox and others. Each had a different ritual, there were women ululating and prayers could be heard in a dozen languages.
Perhaps a little context is in order. The prior administration's policies serially violated human rights and were profoundly cruel. When this administration ended those policies it was inevitable that immigrants seeking hope in the US would return to the border.
This administration's "crisis" is that it is more humane and decent than its predecessors, acting more consistently with international and domestic law. It is a direct result of doing the right thing in the right way. And they are actively seeking to manage it.
Ascribing blame, as the MTP framing does, is deeply misleading. Is this an issue requiring urgent action? Yes. But it is also a situation created by the repugnant behavior of the last administration and the on-going aspiration so many have to come to America.
The problem isn't that Larry Summers was right once and is wrong now. The problem is that so many people told him he was right when he was wrong before that he thinks that he remains right even though he is still wrong now.
He (and all of us in the self-described Democratic "center") were part of the problem. Our policies contributed to inequality, to the hollowing out of the middle class, to the worsening plight of the poorest, and thereby to the weakening of the US economy.
The rationale was markets know best. But not only do markets lack consciences (and would leave the vulnerable by the roadside to die) they turn attention away from the right metrics by which to judge economic progress.
@SecBlinken gave an important speech today, outlining the pillars of Biden Admin foreign policy. It was a departure in several major ways--not just from Trump policies but from those of the Obama Era and before. It deserves careful attention and recognition for its soundness.
Blinken framed the speech noting that the questions confronting American foreign policymakers "aren't the same as they were in 2017 or 2009." He said, "This is a different time...so we're looking at the world with fresh eyes."
From there he enumerated eight core issues: stopping COVID, ending the global economic crisis, renewing democracy (at home and abroad), reforming our immigration system, revitalizing "ties with our allies and partners," tackling the climate crisis & leading a green revolution...
A (v. brief) thread on the Biden Admin decision not to directly sanction MBS for his role in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi:
As I noted yesterday, I was disappointed in the fact that the admin did not impose more direct penalties on MBS for being the architect of the murder.
I did feel they generally handled the matter well otherwise, making a declassified version of the intel findings public, sanctioning Saudis close to MBS, launching a program penalizing others who persecute journalists and naming it after Khashoggi, respecting process, etc.
Not sanctioning MBS directly does send a message that top government officials who have interests that intersect with those of the US may act with impunity. It also suggested that the US so needed the Saudis that we dare not offend them by doing what is right.
I'm afraid that on this, I think the WH blinked. By not specifically sanctioning MBS they send the message that top officials worldwide have impunity in the eyes of the US. They also imply that we need the Saudis more than they need us...which is untrue. An error.
I should add that the Biden policy of exposing the truth and penalizing the Saudis is light-years better than Trump's effective defense of them and rewarding them despite abuses. But being better than Trump cannot become the "don't do stupid shit" of Biden foreign policy.
Having said that, the swift declassification of the Khashoggi report, the introduction of meaningful sanctions, the broader lessons drawn by the admin, and the communications regarding their rationale was handled extremely well.