My friend ⁦@MaxBoot⁩ says the nuclear deal is the only way to restrain Iran’s nuclear ambitions and criticizes me for my rejection of the Biden administration’s desperate effort to return to it.

I adore Max but he’s wrong. Here’s why: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
JCPOA gives Tehran patient pathways to nuke weapons because of restrictions that sunset, advanced centrifuge R&D that permits Iran to develop easier clandestine sneakout, no prohibitions on weapon-grade uranium after 2030 & no requirement for Iran to come clean on weaponization.
It also doesn’t cover missiles and in fact permits the UN missile embargo to expire in 2023 as it permitted the UN arms embargo to expire in 2020.

It also lifts the most powerful economic sanctions thereby flowing tens of billions back into the coffers of the regime.
Max will have you believe pressure hasn’t worked. Well, pressure worked to get the JCPOA in the first place. But remember Obama took 6 years from 2009 to 2015 to leverage that pressure.

Trump only ran a pressure campaign for 2 years and even then it made considerable progress.
Regime is down to its last $4B in accessible FX from $120B. Financial crisis.

Suleimani is dead and Tehran struggling to support its proxies and recover from the loss of its most deadly commander.

Israel is inflicting severe damage on regime operations in the regime.
Through sabotage, Israel has set back considerably Iran’s advanced centrifuge manufacturing and enrichment capabilities.

Mossad has deeply penetrated Iran and is capable of much greater damage to Iranian nuke capabilities especially if close CIA-Mossad cooperation continues.
But Max is right that diplomacy must be tried. The problem is that it makes no sense to move from a policy of maximum pressure to maximum concessions and then believe the US will have leverage to negotiate a “longer, stronger, broader” deal.
Instead, after the US and Iran return to the JCPOA, that will be the end of it. Tehran will have no incentive to give more unless the Biden administration lifts all secondary sanctions, the US primary embargo, all terror designations and much more.
So we will end up with a JCPOA 2.0 more fatally flawed than the original or we will be stuck in JCPOA 1.0 as Iran takes patient pathways to nuclear weapons, immunizes its economy against the use of peaceful sanctions in the future & builds up its regional dominance.
That’s the lethal end state that we arrive at under the JCPOA.

Better to deal with a weaker Iran today than a much stronger one tomorrow where war will become more necessary and more likely in order to stop its sneakout to nuclear weapons.
Trump never really tried to effect a containment policy against the Islamic Republic, where Washington doggedly tries to roll back the clerical regime’s influence throughout the Middle East, patiently aggravating the theocracy’s internal weaknesses.
Containment is the right policy. Billions of dollars wouldn’t be transferred for a short, weak, and narrow nuclear deal. Mass slaughter and terrorism wouldn’t be rewarded.
And, unlike in most other conflict areas, we have an effective ally in Israel capable of countering our common enemy.

Worth asking: If country of 9M with a small but effective Air Force & intelligence service can counter Iran, imagine what we could do if we were serious?
Much more but I’m sure I’ve already violated Twitter policy with a 13-tweet thread. END.
Sorry one more: Just because Israel doesn’t have capacity to “eradicate” the program (a debatable claim by Max) doesn’t mean they can’t do severe damage to it with repeated operations.

And give the US critical leverage it can use instead of re-entering a fatally flawed deal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Dubowitz

Mark Dubowitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mdubowitz

9 Apr
Has @USEnvoyIran given away the US dollar to the regime? Because if he hasn’t yet, he will.

Lifting the prohibition on the “U-Turn” and facilitating the regime’s use of the US dollar.

When this is said and done, you will be shocked by how much is given away.
Cotton-Gallagher resolution with over 60 lead co-sponsors explicitly: “(5) opposes the lifting of the “U-Turn” prohibition, which bans Iran from accessing the United States financial system for the purpose of conducting dollarized transactions” congress.gov/bill/117th-con…
“Dollarization” is what the regime desperately wants. It is not part of JCPOA-prescribed sanctions relief. That concession would be “inconsistent with the JCPOA” in @StateDeptSpox formulation.

Will @USEnvoyIran get anything more and meaningful from regime in return?
Read 4 tweets
12 Mar
The Biden administration is going back into a deeply-flawed nuclear deal that gives the regime in Iran patient pathways to atomic weapons and flows tens of billions of dollars into the coffers of the IRGC.

Don’t lose the thread in the tic-toc of the daily hurly burly.
The strategy will be to negotiate like John Kerry but sound like Tom Cotton (the “Tom and Kerry” strategy) to try and break the Republican consensus & neutralize our MidEast allies.

This is a much more sophisticated group than 2015 in terms of political strategy & messaging.
The “longer, stronger, broader” deal is the way to achieve this political objective. It’s only possible if the Biden administration gives up everything. It’s more likely, after returning to JCPOA, Iran issue goes on the back-burner — and regime enjoys the sunsets.
Read 4 tweets
6 Dec 20
Thread. Nuclear versus Economic Snapbacks: How nuclear extortion beats economic pressure every time when a US president fears Iranian nuclear escalation.
1. We warned in 2015 that Iran has a nuclear snapback, a threat of nuke blackmail that would block an American economic snapback, unless a US president refused to be extorted and was prepared to go it alone.
2. We also argued in 2015 that the US economic snapback was powerful enough that you didn’t need EU or other multilateral support. Companies would choose America over Iran when put to a stark choice — and OFAC was prepared to vigorously enforce US sanctions.
Read 12 tweets
5 Dec 20
I have my disagreements with this piece by ⁦@DanielBShapiro⁩ but there’s common sense in many of his recommendations. The U.S. & Israel share common goals; the important differences will be tactical over the question of when & how to wield leverage. washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/1…
Dan perhaps understandably avoids the real tactical and profound disagreements between the Biden and Netanyahu teams of how and when to use leverage.
The Biden folks believe they can offer major preemptive concessions to encourage Iran back into the JCPOA and then negotiate a follow on agreement that addresses the sunsets and other nuclear and non-nuclear problems.
Read 10 tweets
28 Nov 20
“For two decades, Fakhrizadeh was the driving force behind what American and Israeli officials describe as Iran’s secretive nuke weapons program.

His **work continued** after Iran’s push to develop a bomb was formally disbanded in 2003... nytimes.com/2020/11/27/wor…
... according to American intelligence assessments and Iranian nuclear documents stolen by Israel nearly three years ago.”
For all those falsely claiming that he was a scientist simply in charge of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, facts are stubborn things.
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep 20
In 2018, I co-authored this ⁦@WSJopinion⁩ piece with my @FDD colleague ⁦@ordefk⁩ about the despicable use by Hezbollah and Hamas of human shields.

We were gratified that Congress unanimously passed & president signed human shields law. wsj.com/articles/get-s…
Almost two years have passed & @USTreasury has issued no designations under the law.

Today, @IsraeliPM revealed Hezbollah building & storing precision guided missiles under apartment buildings.

Terror group using Lebanese civilians as human shields.

That’s a war crime.
Even the UN General Assembly passed a resolution declaring the use of human shields to be a war crime.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!