Thread by @kaundabhatta

On the anniv of Bra, let us take in mind few flaws and unethical means he used to spew hate against hindus. He was against Caste, but never chose Atheism like Savarkar, chose a religion equally casteist sharing so many parallels to Hinduism. +

Myth= buddhism believes in equality. No. Buddhism Jainism Hinduism all 3 believe in Samsara, samsara means birth is based on prior karma and karma is due to birth, such circle keeps continuing and this cycle has no beginning. Buddhism cannot exist without Pratitya-samutpada +

Which promotes prior birth's karma determines the type of birth one has. Aatma goes through several births before getting human birth, if he gets human birth he becomes subject to Karma. Animals etc cajt do karma, they only bear the consequences of karma they did in human life. +

good bad karma is only subject to human births, hence the hierarchy inside humans is inevitable. Animal has no intelect to understand good or bad, so Good karma in prev human birth leads to better birth in next life. Proof is buddhisttexts deny intercaste &say buddha was kshatriy

Buddha also was against women entering the Sangha. Now lets see if Buddhism has any provision for moksha to householders? No. Only ppl entering the Sangha through being monk deserve nirvana. Hinduism has kept the doors of moksha open to all, that includes animals. Yes. +

Through Vedic Karma, 3 Varnas get moksha, through jnana-all those who purify the subtle mind and realize brahm, through Bhakti 4 Varnas and Mlechhas, all humans, rakshasas nagas Devas all, even animals. How will animals do bhakti? If animal is lucky enough to be in association +

with a devotee, with his association even the animal can be liberated. Ambedkar wasn't a lowbrain man, he knew all this. Why he chose Buddhism Even though it promoted inequality? Bcoz of brahman bashing, and hindu-bashing.

Buddha redefined meaning of Brahman, meaning of Arya. Caste did not go, it was just added buddhist flavour. So that actual brahmans are removed from positions as temple Archaks and Buddhists started hiring their ow priests in place of brahmans, +

There 2 dey preferred sanghi brahmans in place of vedic brahmans, criticised vedas and Yajnas so brahmans couldn't earn by conducting Pujas Yajnas havans etc, ambedkar in his 22 vows too asks all his ppl to abandon all Hindu festivals ceremonies and not call brahmans for anything

Buddha ambedkar both asked ppl to leave their vedic faith, buddha was more philosophical in spreading hate, ambedkar spread hate very shallow way. Buddha had asked all his followers to not give any bhiksha or Pratigraha to brahmans but only to ppl of sangha. See the parallels?+

Weakening brahmans is easy way to weaken hinduism. Bcoz all knowledge is with brahmans, traditions rituals etc and brahmans are the think tanks the ones who will give the toughest intellectual fight to opponents. Ambedkar was more prejudiced to Hindus than he had love for his kin

If we was really liberal, it is very illiberal to force anyone to change his faith. He didnt argue like buddhists, he just spread false information on hinduism, like Rama having many wives etc. He had no ability to counter philosophically, hence used such unethical means +

He chose the casteist buddhism just to promote brahmanphobia and hinduphobia. What has this helped? Nothing. Inspite of all this agitation, the Shudras haven't risen above. One must understand the significance Shudras held in the successful economic growth of bharat, and +

The acceptance tolerance and vast approach of vedic dharma js such that can accomodate all aspects of life, physical,spiritual, economical, biological,divine and more. Shudras dominated the textile architecture,dance-drama, engin etc fields and should be proud of their ancestry.

This anniversary pledge to yourself to be Propoganda free and realize your dharma, know your dharma. And be an integral part of Varnashrama. Dont have hate for anybody, hate will never let you progress. Ambedkar made this mistake, make sure you dont repeat it. Jai Shrirama.