The shuttering of schools and shuffling of children to an online experience is traumatic and woefully inadequate. Ontario public health and gov't hasn't explained why. I will put forward a hypothesis for consideration. 1/
Simply put, Ontario public health made 4 key mistakes 13 months ago. The include 1) viral threat inflation, 2) use of coercive messaging, 2) proclaiming vaccines as a solution; and 3) NPIs as effective. All were wrong. 2/
This poor intellectual foundation has driven policy failure after policy failure. I assume health officials, epidemiologists and politicians are now painfully aware of the disaster as the harms aren't trivial. 3/
Lets assume they are attempting to dig themselves out of this hole. They would have to walk a balance between fixing their serious failings while maintaining some core faith in gov't. Solutions are unlikely to be pretty. 4/
Enter Canada's latest bungle, the long awaited vaccine rollout. Straight up, these are experimental vaccines that haven't finished proper phase 3/4 trialing. This isn't how it's normally done and there are problems. 5/
Adverse reaction databases reveal concerning levels of deaths, hospitalizations and severe reactions. While observational, this data propels analysts to examine aggregate data and to look for correlations. 6/
Here is an example of Ontario specific data. As mass vaccination has ramped up, so has cases and to a lesser extent hospitalization. We have no death data as it isn't collected in a timely manner. Remember, correlation isn't causation but this data should give one pause. 7/
This seems especially warranted as similar trends have been seen world wide. This phenomenon appears early in the mass vaccination process. A few examples are attached, the first being the UAE 8/
Here is one from Uruguay. 9/
This is a nice paired example of Austria vs Hungary. Curves are the same until mass vaccination starts in Austria. Thanks to @RealJoelSmalley for this data. 10/
So why vaccinate? Its because health officials believe, with justification, that short term issues eventually give rise to long tern benefits. This seems reasonably correct based on data from Israeli and LTCs. 12/
Great in theory but how would the public react. Not well I suspect which is the overarching problem. So how could Ontario Public Health balance long term benefit while dealing with a temporary spike and not alarming the public? 13/
How about creating a 3rd wave storyline to sit on top of the vaccine rollout? That would solve part of the problem. But what happens if clusters of people from the same work setting vaccinate together? 14/
You would see clusters of sickness and perhaps something more serious. Whole sectors might be shut down and this in turn could drive public concern. Cue the teachers' union wanting rapid vaccination and perhaps the preemptive closure of schools. 15/
This is a hypothesis, one of many where people are trying to fit data/ policy actions together. Perhaps, there is additional reasoning underlying the 3rd wave narrative. This hypothesis, however, might explain the strange actions of public health over the last few weeks. End.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Listen to three beautiful minds illuminate epidemiological principles as they apply to C19. Clear, crisp thoughts and infinite patience. Truth is folks, Canada did everything wrong and I mean everything. 1/
Dr. Kuldorff was prescient in saying the C19 response has done immeasurable, long term damage to public health. Trust has disappeared and he isn't sure how it can be restored. 2/
Canada is experiencing a broad systematic failure within public health, from schooling to policy implementation. This community will have to be stripped bare and everything must be restructured to serve the needs of a 21st century society. 3/
There remains a large disconnect between new admissions and the ICU bed census. Likewise, where are these patients originating (community, ward transfers, warehousing of patients)? This isn't clear. 2/
If from the community, shouldn't Ontario public health consider whether the rise in vaccine uptake is fostering infection? Ontario's data points to an association. 3/
Many stimulating conversations this week but one topic stood out. The fringe pseudoscience of Covid Zero. Its clear to me those driving this bus will be in time forever branded as wingnuts, their reputations shattered and their careers shortened. 1/
Their fanatical policies have done immeasurably damage. They are a shocking combination of ignorance and hubris. They have shattered the principles of the enlightenment, Canada's economic foundation and the mental health of millions. A complete abject failure. 2/
Its time to cut through the nonsense. Public health and academia are responsible for this disaster. A post hoc, soft public inquiry won't be enough. We need a full judicial review with prosecutors to illuminate the truth and to lay civil/criminal charges, if needed. 3/
When seeing a doctor for the flu, often they ask if you received the flu shot. That's because in a small number of cases, an attenuated live virus vaccine can elicit an active infection. See Gov't of Canada document. 1/
Although the vaccine technology is distinct, it seems prudent for similar verbal monitoring/reporting of those receiving the C19 vaccine, along with their close contacts. Let me show you why. 2/
There appears to be an association between vaccination number and case numbers. Remember, it is an association and but greater data granularity would be valuable. 3/
Let answers some questions in a simple binary manner.
1) Do people contract C19 and get ill? Yes 2) Is this a clinically important?
Yes 3) Is this unprecedented for a virus?
No 4) Is our health response appropriate?
No
1/
5) Does our health response work?
No 6) Should our health officials know the preceding?
Yes 7) Are health officials distorting the truth?
Yes
All verifiable if one looks dispassionately at the evidence. One can argue over details but that is immaterial.
2/
Its clear to me we are in the midst of a large sophisticated propaganda campaign. Health officials and politician are working together, hand in glove. Its just time to accept it.
3/