If you're curious about Q's predecessors -- that is, other successful and long-running 4chan LARPs -- there are archives of a BUNCH of them.
Here's High Level Insider, for example.
Now, I assume you won't read all 2,067 posts. Even I haven't! But...
hli.anoninfo.net
Here's High Level Insider, for example.
Now, I assume you won't read all 2,067 posts. Even I haven't! But...
hli.anoninfo.net
HLI is one of the most *interesting* LARPers because his narrative was all over the place (for instance, he had an elaborate mythology about the life of the historical Jesus AND weighed in on the invention of calculus with: "Newton was a fraud put forth by British intelligence").
Heck, he wasn't even ardently pro-Trump, despite flourishing during the 2016 campaign and lasting into the early months of the Trump administration.
You would expect, therefore, that /pol/ would brush him off. But no! Those 2,067 posts come from question-and-answer sessions.
You would expect, therefore, that /pol/ would brush him off. But no! Those 2,067 posts come from question-and-answer sessions.
/pol/ was at least curious enough to want to hear more -- or some members were.
And what I take away from this is: a sufficiently skilled LARPer could get away with almost anything and STILL draw an audience... as long as they spun a good, solid, conspiratorial yarn.
And what I take away from this is: a sufficiently skilled LARPer could get away with almost anything and STILL draw an audience... as long as they spun a good, solid, conspiratorial yarn.
P.S. Another good archive is MegaAnon. Note that both HLI and Mega comment on other LARPers -- I don't believe Q ever deigned to discuss other 4chan LARPs while they were on 4chan, did they? I think that's a subtle but effective way to establish supremacy.
rumormillnews.com/texts/MegaAnon…
rumormillnews.com/texts/MegaAnon…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
