1/14

China’s National Bureau of Statistics reported today that GDP grew by 18.3% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2021, although on the back of a sharp contraction in the first quarter of 2020, and driven – unfortunately but not...

caixinglobal.com/2021-04-16/chi…
2/14

surprisingly – by a 25.6% year-on-year expansion in fixed asset investment. Given how useless year-on-year data can be, especially after exceptional periods, many analysts are also reporting that first-quarter GDP rose 0.6% from the fourth quarter last year.
3/14

But while this helps, it ignores appropriate measures of seasonality, which are especially problematic in a period like ours. The best way to consider the data might be to see how close we've arrived at some kind of “normalcy”, perhaps by comparing it with 2019 data.
4/16

By that measure, first quarter 2021 GDP was 10.3% higher than that of first quarter 2019, for an average growth rate of 5.0% of the past two years. GDP growth was 6.0% in 2019 and was targeted to be “around 6%” in 2020, which I interpreted to mean 5.8-6.0%, so by that...
5/14

measure China’s GDP is about 2 percentage points below were we might have expected it had Covid-19 not struck.

That doesn’t seem too bad, but of course ignores the composition of growth and the measures Beijing took to keep GDP growth rates artificially high last year.
6/14

What Beijing considers “high-quality” growth actually shrank substantially during this period, which means that more than 100% (in fact nearly 200%) of last year’s GDP growth was represented by activity on which Beijing has been urgently trying to cut back, one result...
7/14

of which was that last year, China added new debt equal to more than 33 percentage points of GDP in order to achieve nominal GDP growth of 3.0% (real growth of 2.3%). Last year, in other words, was terrible for debt, and terrible for non-productive investment, but it was...
8/14

the only way China could show positive GDP growth.

For me (and increasingly, it seems, for economic and financial policymakers in Beijing) the most important data has to do with the relative performance of consumption and household income.
9/14

Retail sales for Q1 – a proxy for consumption – were up a seemingly spectacular 33.9% year-on-year, but they were up an annualized 4.2% from the first quarter of 2019, which tells us that in the past two years, growth in retail sales has lagged growth in...
10/14

GDP by 2 percentage points. This is confirmed by the Q1 residential income data, which jumped 13.7% year-on-year and by an annualized 4.6% from the first quarter of 2019, which means it has lagged GDP by just over 1 percentage point.
11/14

Obviously in spite of what looks like strong first quarter numbers, the Chinese economy has in fact gone in the wrong direction, although I except the rest of 2021 to be much better as we see a bigger consumption and household income rebound over the rest of this year.
12/14

Many analysts seem to have used Q1 data to raise their already-high GDP forecasts for 2021 (consensus is now 8.4-8.6% apparently), but this reflects, in my opinion, their failure to understand the “residual” role of investment in infrastructure and property.
13/14

I continue to think that Beijing will take advantage of strong consumption, exports and business investment (tied to consumption and exports) to force a sharp cut in growth in investment in infrastructure and property so that they can achieve GDP growth this year...
14/14

of 6-7%, perhaps even a little higher, while keeping the debt-to-GDP ratio steady (which still requires adding new debt equal to roughly 20 percentage points of GDP).

Of course this one-off boost means that next year we'll return to the same old pre-Covid-19 growth model.
I've been reading all day the press and analyst responses to China's data release today, and I have to say that given how badly wrong analysts and the press got their China GDP growth projections last year, I am a little surprised at how, with a few exceptions, they seem to...
...be mostly making the same set of mistakes, but now on the opposite side.

It is a huge mistake to treat growth in property or infrastructure FAI incrementally or independently, when in fact it is usually a politically-determined residual.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

18 Apr
1/5
While much of the foreign press announced spectacular Q1 GDP results, Caixin, characteristically, recognized that part of the reported growth simply represented an expansion of the domestic imbalances.

caixinglobal.com/2021-04-16/chi…
2/5
Their headline: "China’s Rapid GDP Growth Falls Short of Expectations". As they note, "Both household income and consumption grew slower than GDP."

This matters. While I expect China's reported GDP growth to be strong this year (although not nearly as strong as...
3/5
the 8.6% consensus), much more important is that it will mostly be what Beijing refers to as "high-quality" growth, which means that consumption, exports and private business investment will collectively outpace GDP growth.
Read 5 tweets
15 Apr
1/5

Good Bloomberg article on the Huarong mess, some of its systemic implications, and what it says about China's underlying debt problems.

A lot of people already knew at least five years ago, and possibly more, about the tremendous hole into...

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/5

which Huarong was dogging itself — among friends of mine who worked with the big four AMCs, none of whom were notorious for excessive prudence, Huarong managed nonetheless to elicit shock and surprise for its behavior, especially its seemingly reckless acquisitions.
3/5

This particular line in the article reminded me of a conversation I had in 2018 or 2019: "According to people familiar with the matter, Huarong has proposed a sweeping restructuring. The plan would involve offloading its money-losing, non-core businesses. Huarong is still...
Read 5 tweets
15 Apr
1/8

Beijing plans to make it easier for migrants to apply for household registration in the cities in which they live and work. This is good news, and the benefits are fairly obvious: by raising the real income of migrant workers — allowing them...

caixinglobal.com/2021-04-14/chi…
2/8

access to the same municipal services and work protection as hukou residents — it will sustainably boost domestic demand

But while this benefit has always been there, it has taken very long for Beijing to reach even this very preliminary step. Why? Because the benefits...
3/8

come with real costs, and until we know how these costs will be allocated, it isn't clear how serious they are about implementing hukou reforms.

To the extent that the welfare of migrant workers improves, the associated costs have to be absorbed by some other sector for...
Read 8 tweets
14 Apr
1/8

Good blog piece by @andrewbatson on China's "new rhetoric" on reducing inequality, which (and Andrew decides sensibly to skip the obvious irony) begins with: "The Chinese Communist Party is now ideologically committed to reducing income inequality."

andrewbatson.com/2021/04/13/chi…
2/8

In his piece he points out some of the steps Beijing says it will take to reduce inequality within the household sector, and he notes the limited success it has had in the past. I would add another point, which is that there are two very different types of inequality...
3/8

within China, both of which have the same economic effect on China's very low consumption rate and (which is the same thing) its excessive savings rate.

One type, which most of us typically mean by "inequality", is the highly concentrated distribution of income within...
Read 8 tweets
14 Apr
1/19

Apologies in advance for this very long thread, but as regular readers know, I worry greatly about common misunderstandings of the role of reserve currencies. The author seems to assume that what makes a currency a dominant reserve currency is...

ft.com/content/3fe905…
2/19

its low frictional trading costs, which is why, he believes, digital currencies, with China in the lead, will dominate international trade.

But while a low frictional trading cost is a necessary condition, it is not nearly sufficient. A quick glance at the role of the...
3/19

US dollar over the past 100 years, the period during which it achieved dominant status, makes this clear: when the world was short of savings relative to its investment needs, during the first fifty years of that period (a period characterized by the global need to...
Read 21 tweets
14 Apr
1/4

"China Huarong has been under a shadow since its then-chairman Lai Xiaomin came under investigation in 2018. Under his watch, the company expanded into areas including securities trading, trusts and other investments, deviating from the original...

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/4

mandate of disposing bad debt."

Actually it was known long before Hai's arrest that questionable things were happening at Huarong, and that they were involved in activity that none of the other AMC's — no paragons of virtue themselves — would accept. I have many friends...
3/4

and former students who worked with the AMCs as customers or counterparts or in related firms, and for several years before then it was already being pretty openly discussed.

With $42 billion worth of offshore and local bonds ($22 billion in USD) of which 41% matures by...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!