First, let’s see what some of the people who dismiss the idea of systemic racism were up to to today:
Take race scholar @CarmineSabia for instance. He predicted that the shooter couldn’t possibly be white. Then again, he has a history of knowing a lot about racism
A lot of people said the cops were protecting the mass murderer because he was a person of color.
Now I don’t think that’s quite how America works but, who am I to judge geniuses soothsayers like @BuzzPatterson, who also predicted the shooter’s race
He is a noted racism expert
Of course, there are a lot of racist people who who say talking about race is racist...
Until they wanna talk about race.
Like @TameraL36320095 who used a dead 13-year-old to make her racist point?
At leas @conservateurmom isn’t like that. She’s just conservative who hates all that race talk... except when she wants to be lowkey racist
And political and racial commentator @klose_terry, who points out the media’s “quite” obsession with race. She was wrong, too.
So was @patriot_ca who despises this racism... but kinda likes to bring it up when it involves dead people
This was really a thing with white people on Twitter today
I’m not floating that the shooter is white. In fact, I only bring this up for one reason. And it has actually nothing to do with mass shootings.
It’s to remind you that these are the same people who accuse black people of “race baiting,” playing the “race card” and having a “victim mentality.”
Let this be a reminder:
When it comes to racism and white supremacy, whites people don’t know shit.
NOT ONE THING
They weren’t right about it in 1609 when they slaughtered the natives and called THEM the savages.
Not in 1619 when they realized they couldn’t actually build a new world because they were incompetent but called the stolen Africans “uncivilized”
They fought the anti-lynching movement because we were “rapers by nature” they fought integration because “God made us separate.” They we’re just as adamantly opposed to the Civil Rights movement. The Voting Rights Act, the Housing Rights Act...
The MAJORITY of white people opposed every single human rights advancement this country ever made.
WHY WOULD YOU EVER LISTEN TO ANYTHING A WHITE PERSON SAID ABOUT RACE?
I’m not saying an individual white person cant occasionally be right; I’m saying:
Historically and presently, if white PEOPLE collectively push a narrative, it is ALWAYS, ALWAYS wrong.
Now imagine if a news outlet presented two sides of history by jusxtapoding the words of @neiltyson with a random bro who believes the earth is flat.
Or imagine someone thinking they could win in the UFC because they watched a lot of Kung Fu movies and ACTUALLY getting a shot at the heavyweight title!
Sound crazy, right?
Well, race in America is the only topic in which the opinion of people with no expertise, experience, or education will be juxtaposed with people who study work in and live the reality of white supremacy.
That’s why there isn’t, nor has there ever been a racial divide in America
One side is right
And the other side is white people
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
First, you gotta remember that the first English colonies like Jamestown were basically a failure. It turns out, the rich aristocrats who came over weren't good at doing stuff.
"Stuff" includes farming, hunting, and even getting here.
The only reason they survived is welfare.
That's right. They basically depended on the indigenous natives for food for the first few years. It got so bad that the white people started eating their belts, their clothes & each other.
Before Brian Kemp...
Before Reconstruction
Before America
Even before 1619
Black people were fighting for liberation and equality in Georgia.
A thread.
In 1521, Lucas Vásquez de Ayllón landed on the present-day SC coastline on a land-stealing reconnaissance trip for Spain. While looking around, some of his crew stole one of the indigenous people and loaded him on a ship.
Of course, they gave him a white name – Francisco.
They took him to Spain so they could get the Spanish King to grant them exclusive rights to the land that neither of them owned.
Frank assured the King that his people would welcome the white colonizers with open arms because he was willing to vouch for them, so they returned.
First of all, we have to understand what the filibuster is.
It's ANY MEASURE that stops a vote. That's it. That's all. It's not in the Constitution. The Constitution doesn't really have many rules for Congress. It doesn't even mandate that a majority is needed to pass a law.
Specifically, aside from a majority to conduct business; a 3/4 vote to amend the Constitution; and a 2/3rds vote to expel a member, override a presidential veto and impeach a president.
Every other rule, the House & Senate makes up for itself, according to the Constitution