@BoringPrufrock I've always thought that Adelanto is the perfect setup to a stoner movie ;) Picture the scene:
It's midday and Elon is giving a press conference unveiling TBC's latest TBM - a (exaggerated for the sake of the movie) fully automated, battery-powered, compressed-earth-casing,...
@BoringPrufrock super-fast-tunneling beast. Meanwhile, two stoners in a nearby high school decide to escape detention. Nearly caught in the yard, they duck down into an old well, only to discover that it leads down into a tunnel where the TBM sits abandoned. Their curiosity gets the better of...
@BoringPrufrock them and they unintentionally start it up, blocking the tunnel with spoil behind them.
Realizing the potential of what they sitting on, they scheme to break into Shangra La, a local medical marijuana company that's been rumoured to have engineered the most potent cannabis...
@BoringPrufrock strain in the world and sit on a large stash of it. But in their attempts to get there, they first accidentally tunnel into:
* The High Desert Detention Center, causing the escape of several high-profile terrorists
* The Adelanto Power Conversion Station, taking out power...
@BoringPrufrock to Los Angeles, as well as to the local General Atomics lab
* The General Atomics lab, whose drone business turns out to be the cover for developing a secret atomic superweapon - the core of which accidentally falls into and lodges in the TBM
The FBI believes that it's all...
@BoringPrufrock an engineered terrorist plot to attack the US, and is in hot pursuit. The terrorists are in hot pursuit to try to acquire the bomb. Elon Musk is in hot pursuit to get his TBM back, with all of the tech at his disposal. Even the high school principal is after them!
...
@BoringPrufrock Will they reach Shangra La and acquire the ultimate stash? Or will they take a bad turn on this... Deep Trip! ;)
@AukeHoekstra@truth_tesla Huh? Corrosion is one of molten salt's *biggest* problems. And thorium does nothing with respect to corrosion (it's also very immature and has a lot of problems).
But that's just the start of problems.
First off is the fact that you're dealing with toxic materials. And not...
@AukeHoekstra@truth_tesla toxic in the normal sense, but *insanely* toxic, where even vanishingly small amounts of many radioisotopes, quantities you wouldn't give a rat's arse about in any other industry, are too unacceptably toxic for release.
Nuclear produces a broad spectrum of all sorts of these...
@AukeHoekstra@truth_tesla insanely toxic compounds, and each has its own physical and chemical properties. It can be a solid, a liquid, a gas, mobile or immobile in salt, mobile or immoble in water, compatible with steel but not alumium, compatible with alumium but not steel, compatible with this alloy...
THREAD: For everyone who is making an argument akin to, "If Elon says it, then Karpathy must agree, and it must be true", let's take a look at just a tiny bit of the past five years of statements from Elon about FSD.
Remember back in early 2018 when you gained the ability to summon your car from NY to LA?
A friendly old man lives near me and occasionally comes up to chat. Earlier this year we idly started talking about the stock market and I mentioned how well $TSLA had performed and why I think the company was so promising. Just idle chit chat.
Fast forward to the other day. I..
... am outside working on my greenhouse-trailer and he comes up to chat. He brings up Tesla again, and mentions that the price was down to $600. I smile and mention that one who invested at orders of magnitude lower prices hardly loses sleep over these sort of swings. Then...
...he seemed a little nervous and informs me that, based on what I had told him in our previous chat, he had bought $TSLA at $800, only to see it crash (I had no idea he was thinking about investing).
This is a guy who has never even heard of Model Y or Cybertruck. No clue...
Thought: while not applicable to their initial purchases, @elonmusk may eventually end up with sea launch platforms that have no "platform" at all - just a tower.
Consider the new "rocket catching" approach. It's intriguing; it lets you cut a lot of mass off the rocket while...
letting you use as massive of a shock absorption system as you can dream up. Furthermore, a landed rocket cannot fall over. So long as it can navigate into roughly the right place, it's a good landing.
Now let's consider sea launch with a platform.
(1) Arm catches SH ...
(2) Arm rotates, sets it down (3) Some sort of strongback attaches to it to keep it stable and reconnect GSE. (4) Arm catches Starship (5) Arm aligns Starship with SH for remating. SH isn't attached to the tower, so this may take adjustment. (6) Something connects GSE to Starship
Hey @Transport_EU, @AdinaValean - exactly why is your
Team Leader for Automated/Connected Vehicles and Safety sharing an attack article sourced from a short seller against a company he's in charge of regulating? linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…
The bias was obvious, but this is blatant
Please tell me that the guy in charge of approving features knows the difference between an SAE level (what the vehicle *makes the driver do*, for whatever regulatory or liability reasons) vs. how good it actually is at driving.
Please tell me that the guy in charge of approving features knows that mandating driver attention for "FSD City Streets" (aka "FSD Beta") has *always been the case*, would have been a shock if it wasn't going to be in wide release, and that "FSD Beta" != "FSD".
Fascinating read from Jason about the Model S/X range loss issue. My initial take (and apparently his initial take as well) was wrong; I had interpreted charging limits then range loss as being due to new data about degradation with the new Si-bearing anodes, with concerns about
... longevity and fires. The media reporting on fires also affected Jason, misleading him into initially thinking it was an overvoltage issue.
Turns out it was due to sporadic misreadings of the voltage of individual cell groups, and the inability to distinguish them from...
A) legitimate voltage spikes, or B) a stuck MOSFET causing cell misbalancing. With no way to tell if the transients were real, they had to assume they were. Voltages were limited to the peak spike voltage, and the user's range indicator was switched to use the value calculated...